Suchergebnisse

Introduction -- Conceptual background: resilience and urban -- Empirical background: the causes, threats of, and responses to urban flooding in China and the world -- Research methodology -- Individual resilience to urban flooding of Gongming -- Factors influencing individual resilience to urban flooding: people-disaster-place-society -- Nurturing individual resilience through urban management -- Conclusion.

Innovation projects fail at an astonishing rate. Yet, the negative effects of innovation project failures on the team members of these projects have been largely neglected in research streams that deal with innovation project failures. After such setbacks, it is vital to maintain or even strengthen project members' innovative capabilities for subsequent innovation projects. For this, the concept of resilience, i.e. project members' potential to positively adjust (or even grow) after a setback such as an innovation project failure, is fundamental. We develop the second-order construct of innovator resilience potential, which consists of six components – self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, optimism, hope, self-esteem, and risk propensity – that are important for project members' potential of innovative functioning in innovation projects subsequent to a failure. We illustrate our theoretical findings by means of a qualitative study of a terminated large-scale innovation project, and derive implications for research and management.

The study's objective is to examine the impact of community resilience on individual resilience as mediated by positive emotions as a person experiences major life stressors by determining the levels of positive emotions, community resilience, and individual resilience. The study is anchored on Broaden-and- Build Theory by Barbara Fredrickson, whichposits that experience of positive emotions broadens people's momentary thought-action repertoires, which in turn serve to build their enduring personal resources, ranging from physical and intellectual to social and psychological resources. Community Resilience is introduced in the study as a predictor of individual resilience by being mediated by positive emotions. The study utilized a cross-sectional, explanatory non-experimental design. The study used the total population of 99 families and conveniently selected one (1) adult representative as the respondent. Eighteen (87) were qualified as respondents, and twelve (12) were not included in the total enumeration. The study utilized tests of resilience and positive emotions: Dispositional Positive Emotion Scale by Shiota, Keltner, and John, 2006, Interpersonal Support Evaluation List (ISEL) by Brummett, B. H. and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale 25 (CD-RISC 25) by Davidson, JRT and Connor, KM. Mean, Bivariate Regression, and Multiple Regression are the statistical tools. Results demonstrate complete mediation since a value of 0.263 reveals no statistical significance on the direct effect of community resilience on individual resilience after accounting for the mediating effect of positive emotions. The study implies that the influence of community resilience on individual resilience is uniquely explained by how the participants feel positive emotions in their community. The study recommends that psychologists, educators, and government and non-government organizations collaborate in establishing a resilient community that can promote positive emotions and can broaden the capacity for individual resilience.

Healthcare workers are a susceptible population to be psychologically affected during health crises, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. Resilience has been pointed out in the literature as a possible protective factor against psychological distress in crisis situations. This can be influenced by internal and external factors, such as individual characteristics and organizational factors. Thus, this study aims to characterize the overall resilience levels among healthcare professionals in Portugal and to understand the perspectives of this healthcare workers regarding organizational factors that improve individual resilience. This is a mixed-method study: a first quantitative study using a cross-sectional design to administer the Resilience Scale for Adults (RSA) to 271 healthcare professionals (Mage 33.90, SD = 9.59 years, 90.80% female), followed by a qualitative study through 10 in-depth interviews. The mean score for the total RSA was 178.17 (SD = 22.44) out of a total of 231. Qualitative analysis showed 4 major themes on factors that enhance resilience: "Professional's Training," "Support and Wellbeing Measures," "Reorganization of Services" and "Professional Acknowledgment." The findings may contribute to the development of targeted interventions and support systems to enhance resilience and well-being among healthcare workers.

This special issue presents interdisciplinary and innovative perspectives on family and individual resilience. In this introduction, the authors provide an overview of this collection of conceptual and empirical articles that are organized by four categories: families as contexts, families as systems, intervention and policy implications, and methodological considerations. In addition, the authors highlight how resilience was conceptualized and operationalized in these works. This special issue is intended to stimulate the further study of family and individual resilience, especially research that focuses on interdisciplinary collaboration which we feel will only enhance the understanding of this area of research.

Purpose
COVID-19 disrupted the usual way of working for many people across the globe, making full-time work from home and hybrid models two popular work arrangements. Despite the proliferation and high acceptance of the hybrid model, very little research has focused on the same. This study aims to compare the impact of transitions caused by remote work on work disengagement under two settings: remote work and hybrid model.


Design/methodology/approach
The data is collected from three corporate hubs in India: Hyderabad, Gurgaon and Bangalore. This study's respondents represent two working models: full-time work from home and a hybrid model. Responses were collected using Google forms-based questionnaire, which resulted in the following usable responses: 356 (hybrid) and 398 (work from home).


Findings
The findings reveal that the structural model for the hybrid sector explained 11% of the variance in work disengagement, while the same for work from home model accounted for 20% of the variance in work disengagement. The authors also tested for the moderation of individual resilience between work-home and home-to-work conflicts and home-to-work transitions and work-to-home conflict under full-time work-from and hybrid models. Based on 356 respondents from hybrid category and 398 from work from home, the study found that employees experience less work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the hybrid model and employees experience more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts in the full-time work from home model.


Originality/value
The study is also the first to examine the moderating role of individual resilience as a tool to bounce back and handle conflicts. As the full-time work from home model leads to more work-to-home and home-to-work conflicts, individuals have more scope to exhibit resilience, and thus, the moderating relationship is stronger in the full-time work from home model. The paper offers theoretical and managerial implications.

Governments move away from their roles as providers and take on roles as facilitators and enablers. Such transformations provide opportunities for individuals to play an active role in improving the resilience of their communities. However, the effects of such transformations may not be experienced by all communities equally. In the light of the emerging enabling state, which entails a more proactive type of community, this article examines whether community projects can enhance the resilience of hard-to-reach rural communities. Analysis from 345 interviews with rural residents from six communities shows that successful completion of community projects can positively change perceptions of resilience, whereas uncompleted projects negatively affect perceptions of resilience. We conclude that for some hard-to-reach communities, in order to build their resilience, continuous funding support needs to be in place. To enhance the resilience of rural communities, the state must also create opportunities for effective community participation.

Governments move away from their roles as providers and take on roles as facilitators and enablers. Such transformations provide opportunities for individuals to play an active role in improving the resilience of their communities. However, the effects of such transformations may not be experienced by all communities equally. In the light of the emerging enabling state, which entails a more pro-active type of community, this article examines whether community projects can enhance the resilience of hard-to-reach rural communities. Analysis from 345 interviews with rural residents from six communities shows that successful completion of community projects can positively change perceptions of resilience, whereas uncompleted projects negatively affect perceptions of resilience. We conclude that for some hard-to-reach communities, in order to build their resilience, continuous funding support needs to be in place. To enhance the resilience of rural communities, the state must also create opportunities for effective community participation.

This study examines individual resilience as a central mechanism between work design and work-related outcomes in a context characterized by high demands and acute or prolonged adversity: child and youth welfare during an ongoing pandemic. Expanding on a survey of 602 German professionals, structural equation modeling is applied to analyze (1) the relationship between work design and individual resilience, (2) the relationship between individual resilience and work-related outcomes, and (3) the role of individual resilience as a mediator. The results reveal positive relationships between two work design factors (social impact and feedback) and individual resilience. Other work design factors that have been much debated in the context of the pandemic (i.e., working from home and client contact) were not related to individual resilience. In turn, individual resilience is favorably related to job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. The results also confirm the mediating role of individual resilience.

Intro -- Dedication -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- About the Editors -- Contributors -- Chapter 1: Using a Life-World Approach to Understand Family Resilience -- 1.1 How the Study of Life-World Contributes to Resilience Theory -- 1.2 Interpreting Family Responses to the Challenges of Chronic Illness -- 1.2.1 Resilience in Family Caring Practices with Schizophrenia -- 1.2.2 Family Resilience in Dementia -- 1.2.3 Family Resilience in Sudden Death -- 1.3 Discussion and Implications -- Discussion Questions -- References -- Chapter 2: The Experience of Preterm Birth: Helping Families Survive and Thrive -- 2.1 Medical Issues Related to Premature Birth -- 2.2 The NICU Experience for the Family -- 2.2.1 The Infant NICU Experience -- 2.2.2 The Parent NICU Experience -- 2.2.3 The Infant and Parent Relationship in the NICU -- 2.3 Building Resilience -- 2.3.1 Building Resilience While in the NICU -- 2.3.2 Building Resilience in Transition -- 2.3.3 Transition to Community Providers -- 2.3.4 Home Visits -- 2.3.5 Medical Home -- 2.4 Child Maltreatment and Caregiving Burden for NICU Graduates -- 2.5 Developmental Outcomes -- 2.6 Chronic Conditions -- 2.7 Conclusions -- Discussion Questions -- References -- Chapter 3: Enhancing Coping and Resilience Among Families of Individuals with Sickle Cell Disease -- 3.1 Medical Complications and Treatments -- 3.1.1 Medical Management of SCD -- 3.1.2 Prognosis Among Individuals with SCD -- 3.2 Neurocognitive Effects -- 3.2.1 Academic Risk Factors -- 3.3 Resilience and Coping Among Individuals and Families Living with SCD -- 3.3.1 Family Coping with SCD -- 3.3.2 Coping in Children -- 3.3.3 Caregiver Coping -- 3.3.4 Coping in Adults with SCD -- 3.4 Summary and Conclusions -- 3.5 Implications for Understanding Family Resilience -- 3.5.1 Implications for Practice and/or Policy -- 3.6 Future Directions.

"This comprehensive resource offers a detailed framework for fostering resilience in families caring for their older members. Its aim is to improve the quality of life for both the caregivers themselves as much as for those they support. Robust interventions ƯƯƯare presented to guide family members through chronic and acute challenges in areas such as emotional health, physical comfort, financial aspects of care, dealing with health systems, and adjusting to transition. Examples, models, interviews, and an extended case study identify core concerns of caregiving families and avenues for nurturing positive adaptation. Throughout, contributors provide practical applications for therapists and other service providers in diverse disciplines, and for advancing family resilience as a field. Included in the coverage:Therapeutic interventions for caregiving families. Facilitating older adults' resilience through meeting nutritional needs. Improving ergonomics for the safety, comfort, and health of caregivers. Hope as a coping resource for caregiver resilience and well-being. Perspectives on navigating care transitions with individuals with dementia. Planning for and managing costs related to caregiving. Family Caregiving offers a new depth of knowledge and real-world utility to social workers, mental health professionals and practitioners, educators and researchers in the field of family resilience, as well as scholars in the intersecting disciplines of family studies, human development, psychology, sociology, social work, education, law, and medicine."--

Chapter 1. Barriers to Care for Pregnant Women Seeking Substance Use Disorder Treatment -- Chapter 2. Protecting Workers from Opioid Misuse and Addiction -- Chapter 3. Neuroscience-Informed Psychoeducation and Training for Opioid Use Disorder: From Recovery to Resilience -- Chapter 4.NNeonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Caring for Mothers and Infants -- Chapter 5. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Addiction -- Chapter 6. Recovery & Recovery Capital: Aligning Measurement with Theory and Practice -- Chapter 7. TSeven Generations Mindset to Address Substance Use Disorders among Native Americans -- Chapter 8. Associations between SUD in the Family, PFC Functioning, and Codependency: Importance of Family Member Recovery.