Increased Chinese and American defence involvement in Africa
In: Defense & security analysis, Volume 29, Issue 2, p. 89-103
ISSN: 1475-1798
5469 results
Sort by:
In: Defense & security analysis, Volume 29, Issue 2, p. 89-103
ISSN: 1475-1798
World Affairs Online
Afghanistan will experience a major security and development transition over the next three years. At the Kabul and Lisbon Conferences in 2010, NATO and the Afghan government agreed that full responsibility for security would be handed over to the Afghan National Security Forces (ANSF) by the end of 2014. Development progress since 2001 has been mixed. Some major achievements have been recorded, such as rapid economic growth (with large fluctuations), relatively low inflation (after hyperinflation in the 1990s), better public financial management, and gains in basic health and education. Key social indicators, including life expectancy and maternal mortality, have improved markedly (admittedly from an extremely low base), and women are participating more in the economy. Yet in other respects, particularly governance and institution building, the country has fared less well, and many indicators have worsened in recent years. Afghanistan remains one of the world's least developed countries, with a per capita gross domestic product (GDP) of only $528 in 2010/11. More than a third of the population live below the poverty line, more than half are vulnerable and at serious risk of falling into poverty, and three?quarters are illiterate. This report is intended to be comprehensive, so it also discusses the broader historical and political economy context of development in the country, and how Afghanistan compares with other countries that have undergone their own transitions over the past 30 years. This report is based on data collected from various sources in 2011, and its analysis and findings therefore comprise the team's considered assessment using the best available information available by the end of that year. In addition, projections of future trends in Afghanistan inevitably are subject to uncertainty and reflect any weaknesses in the underlying data. Thus the report's projections should be seen as subject to further adjustments and improvements as better and more recent information become available. This report is presented in two volumes. Volume one is a stand?alone Overview which highlights the main findings, projections, and recommendations of the study. Volume two consists of five chapters presenting the detailed empirical background, analytical findings, projections, and recommendations of the study, along with a concluding chapter and three technical appendices.
BASE
This case study examines contemporary experiences of conflict in four contexts: Papua New Guinea, with particular reference to the island of Bougainville and the Highlands region; Solomon Islands; and Vanuatu. We find common themes in these experiences, despite the regions famous sociolinguistic diversity, fragmented geography and varied experience of globalization. Melanesia offers distinctive lessons about how conflict may be understood, promoted and avoided. The paper is organized in two broad parts. The first part is contextual. It provides a brief account of conflict and violence in social life before and after colonization. It then tracks, largely chronologically, through the local, national and transnational dimensions of contemporary conflict, how it was avoided, how it has changed, and how it has been managed in different contexts. Particular attention is given to global and regional influences, and to how governments, local people, and external security, development and commercial actors, have worked to mitigate and, at times, exacerbate conflict. The second part of the case study is more analytical. It steps back from the particulars to address themes and propositions in the overall conceptual framing of World Development Report (WDR) 2011 about the nature of conflict, and the underlying stresses and interests that may render it more likely. Part two draws lessons from the histories and contexts discussed in part one. The report organizes these around three themes that reflect views shared with us by people during consultations. The first highlights the need to recognize conflict as an inherent part of social change and thus the need to distinguish between socially generative social contest, and forms of conflict that are corrosive and destructive. The second examines how the ways people 'see' and understand the world directly shapes systems of regulation and 'the rules of the game' and thus directly affect responses to conflict. The third theme argues that capable and legitimate institutions to regulate social contest requires not just capable state institutions, but as much, relationships with local and international agents and organizations operating below and above the state.
BASE
European Union combines territories of 27 member countries and also economical, trade and financial aspects. It has an essential role in global problems and its importance is increasing equal to adoption of collective decisions in sphere of foreign policy. EU converses with all the world key figures and also with those who have their own opinion about world and their own interests.During the last years the meaning of EU as an independent figure in the modern general European safety system is intensifying. It is important to point that diplomacy stays the basement for mutual foreign and safety policy in EU, so that it is supported by trade, help, safety and defense if it's necessary. This policy is directed firstly to solve the conflicts and reach the international understanding.The topicality of issue. The historical development of Europe witnesses that guaranteeing of safety has been a task of various international political blocks and organizations. Exacerbation of untraditional threats influenced the strengthening of institutional and functional role of international organization in sphere of guaranteeing of safety.Dynamics of international processes points the increasing meaning of regional safety systems in providing of stability in the world. Mutual dependence of regional and global organizations of collective safety and defense is intensifying (UN, NATO, OSCE and EU).The aim of the article is an analyzing of European safety and defense police (ESDP) as policy in process of further closer integration within EU and in the relationships with other international safety organizations.The object of survey is mutual safety and defense policy of EU in the context of new threats to the regional and global safety.The subject of survey – international political specifies of formation and evolution, institutional and practical and international law mechanisms of ESDP since the second half of XX cen. – the beginning of XXI cen.The conclusions In such way, in the last 20 years political and institutional changes in EU has created the premises for the new perception of «purely European» safety space. The development of European safety conception is characterized by complex approach, determination of qualitatively new threats and at the same time emphasizes the accepting of values which are mutual for European countries.1. Earlier in the EU state security relied entirely on the political defensive mechanism of NATO and the political mechanism of OSCE and the UN, the security problems are recently becoming further relevance for European policy and become «internal priority» of the European Union. EU concern for maintaining their own security, the creation of an appropriate system and its organization was implemented in an effort to strengthen the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). However, since its launch CFSP was ineffective political-legal and institutional mechanisms. Therefore, in 1999 the European Union introduced a new, more successful initiative called the European Security and Defense Policy (ESDP).It should be noted that this area of soft security, ie the post-conflict settlement and assist in civil management, and is currently the most successful and best functioning part of ESDP. Scope military solution is still considered controversial by most Member States and has many obstacles to achieve efficient operation.2. The EU strongly and gradually approaching the ability to influence to European and international security. Over the last decade, the EU was able to significantly develop its military component of ESDP as an important link. In particular, the creation and development of military forces allowed the EU to take over peacekeeping missions as in Europe and beyond.3. Enhancing the EU efforts in the area of foreign and security policy was due to the failure of the EU itself resolve the conflict in the Balkans, the knowledge of its own military and technological backwardness, the understanding of the changes in the content and scope of threats and recognition of the need to build an appropriate response strategy. This led to a conceptual change in European security policy and the emergence of initiatives to create a European military instruments of influence on world politics (in the so-called «hard security»).4. Over the last decade, the EU had 23 civilian missions and military operations on three continents. These include the following: peace of the after effects of Tsunami Aceh (Indonesia), the protection of refugees in Chad, the fight against piracy in Somalia and the Horn of Africa. This suggests that the EU's role as a player in the security becomes tangible.As of November 2010 the EU has both thirteen military and civilian missions in 4 regions of the world: the European continent (the Balkans, Moldova / Ukraine), the Middle East, Asia and Africa. Also completed 11 military and civilian operations in the Balkans, the Caucasus, Asia and Africa.While EU operations using inputs NATO. Thus, we can speak of complementary efforts and mutually beneficial cooperation between the EU and NATO.5. In the EU a priority for further development of ESDP recognizes no quantitative growth indicators and qualitative implementation of capacity in this area, which in turn confronts the EU Member States following objectives: reaching consensus on all aspects of common security and defense policy, development and learning new methodologies crisis management, effective use of international cooperation, strengthening the defense industry and military technology.6. Motivation to improve the state of national security, stabilization of the internal and external situation, reducing dependence and further out from the influence of a number of other reasons make our country more actively in the foreign and security policy. The overall process of the EU integration process involves appropriate in all areas and sectors, including security, so further participation in the CFSP has a positive attitude affect the positioning of Ukraine in the security dimension of European geopolitical space. Achieving this goal is possible only in case of joint ownership of all political parties, the government and the President to improve geo-political situation of our country both in Europe and internationally. ; Статья посвящена исследованию проблемы формирования, развития и усовершенствования оборонительной политики и политики безопасности Европейского Союза, совместной внешней политики и политики безопасности.Анализируются основные шаги европейского сообщества в направлении создания собственной, Европейской оборонительной политики и политики безопасности в контексте новых угроз региональной и глобальной безопасности, состояние и трансформация отношений ЕС и НАТО в сфере безопасности. ; Статтю присвячено дослідженню проблеми формування, розбудови та вдосконалення оборонної і безпекової політики Європейського Союзу, спільної зовнішньої та безпекової політики.Аналізуються основні кроки європейського співтовариства в напрямку створення власної, Європейської безпекової та оборонної політики в контексті нових загроз регіональній і глобальній безпеці, стан та трансформація стосунків ЄС і НАТО у сфері безпеки.
BASE
In: Forum Paper Series, 22
World Affairs Online
In: Internationale Politik: das Magazin für globales Denken, Volume 58, Issue 11, p. 77-133
ISSN: 1430-175X
World Affairs Online
In: Europa-Archiv / Beiträge und Berichte, Volume 49, Issue 17, p. D487-D524
World Affairs Online
In: Politique étrangère: PE ; revue trimestrielle publiée par l'Institut Français des Relations Internationales, Volume 58, Issue 2, p. 447-458
ISSN: 0032-342X
World Affairs Online
World Affairs Online
In: Berichte des Bundesinstituts für ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien, 2-1998
UNO-Vermittler Dr. Norbert Holl hat Afghanistan eines der vertracktesten sicherheitspolitischen Probleme der Welt nach dem Kalten Krieg genannt. Dabei hatte der Westen, allen voran die USA, seit dem sowjetischen Truppenabzug 1989 bis in die jüngste Zeit alles Interesse an dem Land verloren. Auch Rußland hat seit 1991 längere Zeit - wenn auch nicht aus identischen Gründen - eine analoge "Linie" verfolgt. Doch aufgrund seiner Rolle als militärische Schutzmacht der GUS ist Moskau von den Geschehnissen im Land am Hindukusch weiterhin mehr oder minder direkt betroffen. Stellt doch Afghanistan mit seiner anhaltenden Anarchie und ihren destabilisierenden Auswirkungen für die zentralasiatischen GUS-Staaten die unmittelbar gefährlichste sicherheitspolitische Bedrohung dar. Hinzu kommt seit geraumer Zeit das Interesse an der Rolle Afghanistans als Transitland für geplante Pipelines und Verkehrsverbindungen mit dem Süden, wodurch die vom Meer abgeschnittenen zentralasiatischen Kontinentalstaaten hoffen, ihre Wirtschaft aus der Krise führen sowie ihre politische Souveränität absichern zu können. (BIOst-Dok)
World Affairs Online
In: Security and human rights, Volume 27, Issue 1/2, p. 59-84
ISSN: 1874-7337
World Affairs Online
In: Internationale Politik: das Magazin für globales Denken, Volume 54, Issue 8, p. 17-24
ISSN: 1430-175X
World Affairs Online
In: Europäische Rundschau: Vierteljahreszeitschrift für Politik, Wirtschaft und Zeitgeschichte, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 19-25
ISSN: 0304-2782
World Affairs Online
In: Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte: APuZ, Volume 30, Issue 11, p. 18-32
ISSN: 0479-611X
World Affairs Online
Today's diplomacy is an ambiguous phenomenon which involves many diverse tools and actions undertaken by national and international actors. Diplomacy is undoubtedly one of a key element of international peace and security as it enables disputes and conflicts to be prevented . There is a host of measures and instruments that can be exercised at any stage of a crisis, among which are special political missions. This paper is an attempt to discuss the nature and role of a special political mission in preventive actions. The main attention is paid to the missions established by the United Nations and by the European Union. The considerations resulted in listing strengths of the special political missions and in identifying the challenges that should be faced in order to increase an effectiveness of the missions. ; University of Silesia in Katowice, Faculty of Law and Administration, Institute of Law, International Law and European Law, Poland ; PhD at Institute of Law, International Law and European Law, Faculty of Law and Administration, University of Silesia in Katowice ; malgorzata.myl@us.edu.pl ; 9 ; 25 ; 2 ; A/RES/43/51 (1988, December 5). Declaration on the Prevention and Removal of Disputes and Situations Which May Threaten International Peace and Security and on the Role of the United Nations in this Field. ; A/47/277 (1992, January 31). An Agenda for Peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. ; A/RES/47/120B (1993, September 20). An Agenda for Peace. ; A/RES/48/42 (1993, December 10). Comprehensive review of the whole question of peace – keeping operations in all their aspects. ; A/50/60 (1995, January 25). The Supplement to an Agenda for Peace: Position Paper of the Secretary-General on the Occasion of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the United Nations. ; A/54/1 (1999, August 31). Report of the Secretary-General on the Work of the Organization. ; A/66/340 (2011, October 12). Report of the Secretary-General on Review of arrangements for funding and backstopping special political missions. ; A/RES/70/1 (2015, September 25). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. ; A/RES/70/262 (2016, April 27). Review of the United Nations peacebuilding architecture. ; A/72/525 (2017, October 13). Report of the Secretary-General on Restructuring of the United Nations peace and security pillar. ; A/72/707 (2018, January 18). Report of the Secretary-General on peacebuilding and sustaining peace. ; A/RES/74/6(sec.3)/Add.1 (2019, June 19). Resolution of the United Nations General Assembly. ; Banim, G., & Pejsova, E. (2017). The EU and preventive diplomacy: from policy to practice. In G. Banim & E. Pejsova (Eds.), Prevention better than cure: the EU's quiet diplomacy in Asia. ; ISSUE Report No. 33. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Retrieved from https://www.iss.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUISSFiles/Report%2033_0.pdf. ; Bunche, R. (1960, March 25). Ralph Bunche statement to the 11th General Assembly of the International Press Institute. Report of the Secretary-General on Overall policy matters pertaining to special political missions, A/68/223. ; Cîrlig, C.-C. (2016). Financing of CSDP missions and operations. European Parliamentary Research Service. PE577.958. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2016/577958/EPRS_ATA(2016)577958_EN.pdf. ; CSDP (2017). Women in CSDP missions. Policy Department for External Relations, Directorate-General for External Policies. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2017/603855/EXPO_STU(2017)603855_EN.pdf. ; CSDP (2020). CSDP Missions and Operations. Policy Department for External Relations, European Parliament's Sub-Committee on Security and Defence. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2020/603481/EXPO_IDA(2020)603481_EN.pdf. ; EEAS (2019). EU CSDP missions and operations for human security. European External Action Service. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage_en/430/Military%20and%20civilian%20missions%20and%20operations. ; EEAS (2020). Annual Activity Report 2019. European External Action Service. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eeas_annual_activity_report_2019_-_final_for_web.pdf. ; EU Global Strategy (2016). Shared Vision, Common Action: A Stronger Europe. A Global Strategy for the European Union's Foreign And Security Policy. Retrieved from https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/top_stories/pdf/eugs_review_web.pdf. ; Evans, G. (1994). Współpraca dla Pokoju. Agenda na lata 90. i następne [Cooperating for Peace:The Global Agenda for the 1990s and Beyond]. Warszawa: Polski Instytut Spraw Międzynarodowych. ; Faleg, G. (2018). The EU: from comprehensive to integrated approach. Global Affairs, 4(2–3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2018.1492877. ; Gowan, R. (2011). Multilateral Political Missions and Preventive Diplomacy: Special Report. New York: United States Institute of Peace. Retrieved from https://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/SR299.pdf. ; Guterres, A. (2017a). Secretary-General António Guterres addresses the Security Council ministerial-level open debate on conflict prevention and sustaining peace. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/speeches/2017-01-10/secretary-generals-remarks-maintenance-international-peace-and. ; Guterres, A. (2017b). The vision of the Secretary-General on Prevention, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.antonioguterres.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/antonio-guterres-vision-statement.pdf. ; Hamilton, K., & Langhorne, R. (2010). The Practice of Diplomacy: Its Evolution, Theory and Administration. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203841891. ; Højstrup G.Ch., Kammel, A., Norvanto, E., Ruohomäki, J.J., Mandrup, T., & Rodt, A.P. (2017). Successes and Shortfalls of European Union Common Security and Defence Policy Missions in Africa: Libya, South Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Central African Republic. Copenhagen: Royal Danish Defence College. Retrieved from https://pure.fak.dk/files/7353983/Successes_and_Shortfalls_04.pdf. ; Howorth, J. (2014). Security and Defence Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ; Jakobsen, P.V. (2009). Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP. Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(1), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2008.01833.x. ; Jenca, M. (2013). The Concept of Preventive Diplomacy and Its Application by the United Nations in Central Asia. Security and Human Rights, 24(2), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02402009. ; Jentleson, B.J. (2000), Preventive Diplomacy: A Conceptual and Analytic Framework. In B.J. Jentleson (Ed.), Opportunities Missed, Opportunities Seized. Preventive Diplomacy in Post-Cold War World, New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from https://media.carnegie.org/filer_public/9e/43/9e435fc8-f8fd-4764-aabd-2c8eba103b38/ccny_book_1999_opportunities.pdf. ; Johnstone, I. (2010). Emerging Doctrine for Political Missions. In R. Gowan (Ed.), Review of Political Missions 2010. A project of the Center on International Cooperation. New York: NYU Center on International Cooperation. Retrieved from https://cic.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/political_missions_2010_full.pdf. ; Kugel, A. (2011). No Helmets, Just Suits: Political Missions as an Instrument of the United Nations Security Council for Civilian Conflicts Managements. Berlin: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Retrieved from https://peaceoperationsreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/rel_pub_2011_kugel_helmets.pdf. ; Leader, J.E. (2020). From Hope to Horror: Diplomacy and the Making of Rwanda Genocide. Nebraska: University Nebraska Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d65n. ; Lee, D., & Hocking, B. (2011). Diplomacy. In B. Badie, D. Berg-Schlosser & L. Morlino, International Encyclopedia of Political Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Pub. Inc. ; Luthuli, A., & Ntsaluba, A. (2012). Reflections on Africa in the light of the legacies of Dag Hammarskjold and Albert Luthuli. In T. Sellstrom (Ed.), Albert Luthuli and Dag Hammarskjold –Leaders and Visionaries (pp. 9-15). Sweden: The Nordic Africa Institute. Retrieved from http://www.daghammarskjold.se/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/FULLTEXT01.pdf. ; Mahmoud, Y., Makoond, A., & Naik, A. (2018). Entrepreneurship for Sustaining Peace. In Y. Mahmoud, L. Connolly & D. Mechoulan (Eds.), Sustaining Peace in Practice: Building on What Works. New York: International Peace Institute. Retreived from https://www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/1802_Sustaining-Peace-in-Practice.pdf. ; McGovern, M., & Batmanglich, S. (2010). Independent Review of the UN Office for West Africa, annex to a letter dated 10 December 2010 from the Secretary-General to the President of the Security Council. UN Document S/2010/693. ; Rodt, A.P. (2017). Effectiveness in Operational Conflict Prevention: How Should We Measure It in EU Missions and Operations? In E. Norvanto & H. Dumur-Laanila (Eds.), Seminar Publication on Contemporary Peace Operations – From theory to practice. Based on EAPTC Seminar 2-4 May 2017 Helsinki. Articles from the European Peace Training Community (pp. 79-86). Helsinki: Finnish Defence Forces International Centre. Retrieved from https://www.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/143913/EAPTC_Seminar%20Publication.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y. ; Ramcharan, B.G. (2008). Preventive Diplomacy at the UN. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. ; Res. 186(S-2) (1948, May 14). Resolution of the United Nations General Assembly. ; S/2001/394 (2001, April 20). Report of the United Nations Secretary-General: No Exit Without Strategy: Security Council decision-making and the closure or transition of United Nations peacekeeping operations. ; S/2011/527 (2011, August 19). Report of the Secretary-General on Civilian Capacity in the Aftermath of Conflict. ; S/2011/552 (2011, August 26). Report of the Secretary-General on Preventive Diplomacy: Delivering Results. ; S/RES/1325/2000 (2010, October 31). Resolution on Women and Peace and Security. ; S/RES/2282 (2016, April 27). The resolution of the United Nations Security Council adopted at its 7680th meeting. ; Salto, H. (2003). Containing conflict. Cases in preventive diplomacy. Washington: Brookings Institute Press. ; Sellwood, E. (2008). The Role of the United Nations in Middle East Conflict Prevention. New York: Centre on International Cooperation. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/AB1CF70D4A5E74A4492575EC0005FECA-Full_Report.pdf. ; Slim, H. (2007). A Guide to Mediation: Enabling Peace Processes in Violent Conflicts. Geneva: Centre for Humanitarian Dialogue. Retrieved from http://www.hdcentre.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/83Guidedelamediation-February-2008.pdf. ; Sokalski, H.J. (2003). An Ounce of Prevention: Macedonia and the UN Experience in Preventive Diplomacy. Washington: USIP Press Books. ; Stankiewicz, W. (2009). Dyplomacja prewencyjna jako środek utrzymania ładu na kontynencie europejskim [Preventive diplomacy as a means of maintaining order on the European continent]. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio K, Politologia, 16(1), 47-65. Retrieved from https://bazhum.muzhp.pl/media//files/Annales_Universitatis_Mariae_Curie_Sklodowska_Sectio_K_Politologia/Annales_Universitatis_Mariae_Curie_Sklodowska_Sectio_K_Politologia-r2009-t16-n1/Annales_Universitatis_Mariae_Curie_Sklodowska_Sectio_K_Politologia-r2009-t16-n1-s47-65/Annales_Universitatis_Mariae_Curie_Sklodowska_Sectio_K_Politologia-r2009-t16-n1-s47-65.pdf. ; UN SC Resolution 1233 (1999, April 6) on the situation in Guinea-Bissau. ; UN SC Resolution 1401 (2002, March 28) on situation in Afghanistan. ; UN SC Resolution 1959 (2010, December 16) on the situation in Burundi. ; UN SC Resolution 2009 (2011, September 16) on situation in Libya. ; UN SC Resolution 2102 (2013, May 2) on situation in Somalia. ; Tlałka, K. (2014). Międzynarodowe wysiłki polityczne i militarne na rzecz stabilizacji państw dysfunkcyjnych [International political and military efforts to stabilize dysfunctional states]. In R. Kłosowicz (Ed.), Państwa dysfunkcyjne i międzynarodowe wysiłki zmierzające do ich naprawy (pp. 203-244). Kraków: Wyd. Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. ; UN DPKO & UN DFS (2020, February 1). Guidelines on police administration in the United Nations peacekeeping operations and special political missions. Retrieved from https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/4._rule_of_law_-_9_police_administration.pdf. ; UN DPPA (2012). Special political missions start-up guide. The United Nations Department of Political Affairs. Retrieved from https://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/SPMStartupGuide_UNDPA2012.pdf. ; UN SG (2013). Report of the Secretary General on United Nations Political Missions, pursuant to Resolution 67/123. ; Williams, A. (2013). An Imperative for Preventing Deadly Conflict. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 37(3), 25-33. Retrieved from https://static1.squarespace.com/static/579fc2ad725e253a86230610/t/57ec79da2994ca3021e02861/1475115489292/Williams-FA.pdf. ; Wróblewska-Łysik, M. (2016). Europejska Strategia Globalna a możliwości współpracy Unii Europejskiej z NATO po szczycie w Warszawie [European Global Strategy and the possibilities of cooperation between the European Union and NATO after the Warsaw Summit]. Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe, 37-40(1-4), 67-83. Retrieved from https://www.bbn.gov.pl/ftp/dok/03/37-40_KBN_Wroblewska.pdf. ; 4
BASE