Suchergebnisse

Preface -- Contents -- Introduction to Technology Competence -- 1 Introduction to Ethics and Technology -- 2 Technological Competence -- 3 Outsourcing -- 4 Receipt of Privileged Information -- The History of Technology Competence -- 5 What Is Technology? -- 5.1 What IS Technology? -- 5.2 Identifying Technology Risks -- 5.3 Identifying Technology Benefits -- 5.4 Conclusion -- 6 How Did We Get Here? -- 7 Technology: Then and Now -- 7.1 The Network -- 7.2 Backdoor Access -- 7.3 Historical Context -- 7.4 Moore's Law -- 7.5 Where Are We Now -- 8 Benchmarking Technology Competence -- 8.1 Looking Beyond Legal -- 8.1.1 ISO Certifications -- 8.1.2 PMP -- 8.1.3 Six Sigma -- Technology in Litigation -- 9 Introduction to eDiscovery -- 10 Authenticity -- 10.1 The Problems and Their Solutions -- 10.1.1 Tender of Electronic Information to Establish That the Information was on a Website -- 10.1.2 The Internet Archive-"The Way Back Machine" -- 10.1.3 Communications Using the Internet -- 10.1.4 Text Messages and Instantaneous Communications -- 10.1.5 Social Media Postings and Tweets -- 10.1.6 Computer Generated Data -- 10.1.7 Business Records -- 10.1.8 Self-authentication -- 11 The "Ethics" or Lack of Them During Negotiations -- 12 Technology Assisted Review -- Strategies for Achieving Competence -- 13 Transparency -- 13.1 Defining Transparency -- 13.2 The Growing Need for Transparency in eDiscovery -- 13.3 Beyond eDiscovery: Transparency in Transactional Matters -- 14 Effective Communication -- 14.1 Establishing Roles and Responsibilities -- 14.2 Sharing Knowledge Among Team Members and Stakeholders -- 14.3 Efficiently Responding to Emergent Circumstances -- 15 Achieving Consistency -- 15.1 DMAIC -- 16 Managing Variable Needs -- 16.1 What Is Scalability? -- 16.2 Capability -- 16.3 Availability -- 16.4 Repeatability -- 16.5 The Challenges -- 16.6 Solutions

AbstractPreventive Legal Technology (PLT) is a new field of Artificial Intelligence (AI) investigating the intelligent prevention of disputes. The concept integrates the theories of preventive law and legal technology. Our goal is to give ethics a place in the new technology. By explaining the decisions of PLT, we aim to achieve a higher degree of trustworthiness because explicit explanations are expected to improve the level of transparency and accountability. Trustworthiness is an urgent topic in the discussion on doing AI research ethically and accounting for the regulations. For this purpose, we examine the limitations of rule-based explainability for PLT. Hence, our Problem Statement reads: to what extent is it possible to develop an explainable and trustworthy Preventive Legal Technology? After an insightful literature review, we focus on case studies with applications. The results describe (1) the effectivity of PLT and (2) its responsibility. The discussion is challenging and multivariate, investigating deeply the relevance of PLT for LegalTech applications in light of the development of the AI Act (currently still in its final phase of process) and the work of the High-Level Expert Group (HLEG) on AI. On the ethical side, explaining AI decisions for small PLT domains is clearly possible, with direct effects on trustworthiness due to increased transparency and accountability.

The article examines the nature of the interaction of legal technology and legal technology, analyzes international experience on the regulation of the practical application of this toolkit. Legal technology is a special branch of scientific knowledge, with the help of which transformations in law are carried out and it is possible to plan processes for achieving legal prospects in order to implement the most effective and systematic legal practice. The authors theoretically substantiate the process-instrumental nature of legal activity and show that at each stage, stage, certain legal and technical resources are consistently applied. It is possible to deliberately influence legal validity if one chooses not only the type of legal activity, specific procedural and procedural actions, but also correctly selected resources of legal technology. The need for technological support is especially acute when it is necessary to influence complex legal entities in order to optimize management decisions and reduce legal risks from technical and legal and legal technological errors. The authors conclude that one of the significant reasons for the vulnerability of legal activity is the unresolved issue of normative regulation of the requirements of legal technology and the lack of synchronization between legal technology and technology. In this regard, the phenomena associated with the growth of defects in law, a decrease in the technical and legal quality of legislation and the growth of legal anomalies are exacerbated. A significant strategic task is the active interaction of legal policy and legal technology, which will provide the prerequisites for moving to a new level of legal development design. In this aspect, legal technology allows you to implement strategic tasks, create the necessary legal reality. Promising authors see the use of modern information technologies in the legal sphere, which will positively affect the growth of the quality of the legal life of society, the protection of rights and freedoms, ensuring a stable law and order and national security of Russia.

Die Arbeitsweise von Rechtsanwältinnen und Rechtsanwälten wird aller Voraussicht nach schon in – relativ betrachtet – wenigen Jahren in essentiellen Punkten nicht mehr derjenigen gleichen, die sie heute ist. Auch dem Rechtsmarkt im Gesamten stehen gravierende Umwälzungen bevor. Diesen Entwicklungen steht vor allem das bisweilen von den Berufsträgern selbst als (zu) eng empfundene Korsett des anwaltlichen Berufsrechts gegenüber, das aus Gründen der eigenen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit im digitalen Zeitalter gelokert werden müsse. Nicht erst die aktuellen Diskussionen um neue Geschäftsmodelle im Bereich »Legal Tech(nology)« zeigen, dass das Berufsrecht einem über die Jahre hinweg betrachtet enormen Wandlungsprozess unterliegt. Die Arbeit leitet aus einem bewusst breit gewählten Ansatzpunkt heraus ein Anforderungsprofil für die Anwaltschaft in der gegenwärtigen Informationstechnologiegesellschaft her, welches auch und gerade auf grundlegende, rechtstheoretische Überlegungen gestützt wird. -- Ausgezeichnet mit dem Promotionspreis der Rechtsanwaltskammer München 2019. / »Digitalisation, Legal Technology and Innovation. The Decisive Legal Framework and the Requirements for a Lawyer in the Information Technology Society« -- From a deliberately broadly chosen starting point, the thesis derives a requirement profile for the legal profession in today's information technology society that is also based on fundamental, legal-theoretical considerations. Specifically, the legal implications (mainly with regard to the legal profession) of the lawyer's activity are examined in relation to law firm marketing and external communication, internal work processes and internal communication as well as consulting services as such.

Solo and small firm lawyers can find the best technology for their dollar. This state-of-the-art guide provides the most current and clearly presented information and recommendations on computers, servers, networking equipment, legal software, printers, security products, smartphones, tablets, and anything else a law office might need.

The European Commission declares that social economy gives a lot to the European Union. The Council of the European Union defines the social economy as a key driver of economic and social development in Europe. Therefore, this paper attempts to look at the case of regulating social business through the legal technology. So far it is up to the particular country to decide whether the social enterprise is supposed to obtain special legal form or not. The connection of the legal technology with regulation of incorporation and maintenance of social enterprise also varies from state to state. The correlation between the above mentioned aspects is yet quite insignificant. Therefore, much more needs to be done at all levels of public policy to optimize the framework conditions for social enterprises.

The European Commission declares that social economy gives a lot to the European Union. The Council of the European Union defines the social economy as a key driver of economic and social development in Europe. Therefore, this paper attempts to look at the case of regulating social business through the legal technology. So far it is up to the particular country to decide whether the social enterprise is supposed to obtain special legal form or not. The connection of the legal technology with regulation of incorporation and maintenance of social enterprise also varies from state to state. The correlation between the above mentioned aspects is yet quite insignificant. Therefore, much more needs to be done at all levels of public policy to optimize the framework conditions for social enterprises.