Suchergebnisse

ObjectiveThis article seeks to reframe so‐called Confederate monuments as monuments to the revisionist "Lost Cause." I define these monuments as a problem for historic preservation that has long been based on a preference for in‐place protection of things "historic."MethodsI compare Confederate monuments' original intent with arguments that these are Civil War, soldier, or veteran memorials. I also explore monuments' value as sculpture and their de facto status as nationally significant and worthy of preservation.ResultsConfederate monuments are monuments to the Lost Cause, a narrative supporting the resurgence of white supremacy. We must reconsider the in‐place preservation of these monuments as a de facto choice of historic preservation.ConclusionThe structural problem of Confederate monuments for our national historic preservation program calls for its broader evaluation for inclusivity and racial justice. We must find other ways to tell the history of the Confederacy than through physical propaganda pieces of the failed national insurrection of the 1860s.

This item is part of: Boarin, P., Haarhoff, E., Manfredini, M., Mohammadzadeh, M., Premier, A., (2021). Rethinking Sustainable Pacific Rim Territories. Proceedings of the 2020 APRU Sustainable Cities and Landscapes Hub PhD Symposium, Future Cities Research Hub, School of Architecture and Planning of the University of Auckland. ISBN: 978-0-473-53616-9 ABSTRACT This paper summarises legal and planning statutes as they relate to cultural heritage landscapes and indigenous heritage. Since the mid 1990's government agencies and heritage groups have attempted to develop structures and drafted policies for better protection of Māori heritage and cultural heritage landscapes. They have covered a wide and complex range of needs and values but, to date, have failed to embed better protective laws and policies with more effective outcomes. Through a socio-political critique of heritage law, planning and policy development in Aotearoa over the last 40 years the power relationships between different heritage ontologies in Aotearoa is explored. Further, this paper offers insights into Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations, particularly principles of kāwanatanga (governance) and kaitiakitanga (guardianship). Expanding on the work of Huhana Smith (2013) shows how a cultural heritage landscape approach, if applied, would better address Te Tiriti obligations. Finally, the paper will highlight elements of the #protectihumātao campaign in Auckland that demonstrates the current weaknesses of heritage planning regimes and environmental regimes in Aotearoa.

This item is part of: Boarin, P., Haarhoff, E., Manfredini, M., Mohammadzadeh, M., Premier, A., (2021). Rethinking Sustainable Pacific Rim Territories. Proceedings of the 2020 APRU Sustainable Cities and Landscapes Hub PhD Symposium, Future Cities Research Hub, School of Architecture and Planning of the University of Auckland. ISBN: 978-0-473-53616-9 ABSTRACT This paper summarises legal and planning statutes as they relate to cultural heritage landscapes and indigenous heritage. Since the mid 1990's government agencies and heritage groups have attempted to develop structures and drafted policies for better protection of Māori heritage and cultural heritage landscapes. They have covered a wide and complex range of needs and values but, to date, have failed to embed better protective laws and policies with more effective outcomes. Through a socio-political critique of heritage law, planning and policy development in Aotearoa over the last 40 years the power relationships between different heritage ontologies in Aotearoa is explored. Further, this paper offers insights into Te Tiriti o Waitangi obligations, particularly principles of kāwanatanga (governance) and kaitiakitanga (guardianship). Expanding on the work of Huhana Smith (2013) shows how a cultural heritage landscape approach, if applied, would better address Te Tiriti obligations. Finally, the paper will highlight elements of the #protectihumātao campaign in Auckland that demonstrates the current weaknesses of heritage planning regimes and environmental regimes in Aotearoa.

[EN] The main objective of the study is to assess, independently of the scenic beauty, the importance and composition of the different attributes within a given landscape. For this purpose, the study focuses on Penyagolosa where we have selected three areas of evaluation to determine the importance of distance in the determination of heritage values of the landscape. Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) determines what values are detectable on the basis of the terms of proximity and remoteness and how they are applied in three cases of assessment. Thus, 5 criteria have been set to analyze these values: 1. the overview of the landscape, 2. dominance or intensity of elements, 3. the aesthetic composition of space, 4. The selective interpretation of the visual and 5 variables. The fragility or alterations induced in the landscape. Ultimately, criteria are discussed from dynamic and static fields of the authenticity and integrity of the landscape and they affect how they neglect. ; This study has been funded by the Chair: Cátedra Diputación de Centros Históricos e Itinerarios Culturales de Castellón; Universitat Jaume I. This research has also been funded by the project "Crafts and Artisans", from the Regional Government of Valencia, Spain. GV/2017/100. ; Altaba Tena, P. (2018). The perception of heritage values and their analysis by using GIS tools in vernacular heritage landscapes. VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability. 3(1):12-27. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2018.10143 ; SWORD ; 12 ; 27 ; 3 ; 1 ; Agnoletti, M. (2014). Rural landscape, nature conservation and culture: Some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 126, 66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012 ; Benayas, J., Martins, A., Nicolau, J., & Schulz, J. (2007). Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB reviews: Perspectives in agriculture, veterinary science, ...

This important book is a must for everyone concerned with the heritage and future of Canada's parks. Contributors include an impressive assembly of noted park experts ranging from academic authorities and government parks personnel to concerned nonpolitical park supporters. Since the establishment of Banff National Park in 1885 and Algonquin Provincial Park in 1893, parklands have been part of Canada's heritage. Where other protected areas, such as forest reserves, heritage rivers and greenways, have also been created, a more comprehensive view of the creation and management of conservation a