Suchergebnisse

В статье проведен анализ соблюдения принципа неприкосновенности права частной собственности при обращении взыскания на имущество. Ограничения принципа неприкосновенности проявляются как в отношении объектов имущества, так и в отношении правомочий собственника, что при надлежащем подходе со стороны законодателя не является нарушением прав и интересов лица. Единственное жилое помещение может выступать предметом обращения взыскания по долгам наследодателя. Установлено, что размер денежных средств, не подлежащих взысканию, должен определяться прожиточным минимум по субъекту РФ, а также дополнительно должны быть гарантированы средства на расходы для приобретения необходимых лекарственных препаратов и оборудования. Выявлены недостатки и противоречия при регулировании оснований обращения взыскания на отдельные виды имущества, внесены предложения по совершенствованию данных положенийIn the article, we have performed an analysis of respect for the principle of immunity of the right of a private property in case of the address of a claim to property. Restrictions of the principle of immunity are shown concerning both property objects, and concerning competences of the owner that in case of proper approach from the legislator is not violation of the rights and interests of the person. The unique premises can act as a subject of the address of collection of debts of the testator. It is established that the size of the money which isn't subject to collection shall be determined living at least by the territorial subject of the Russian Federation, and also funds for expenses for acquisition of necessary medicines and the equipment shall be in addition guaranteed. Shortcomings and contradictions in case of regulation of the bases of the address of collection on separate types of property are revealed, suggestions for improvement of these provisions are made

В данной статье рассматривается проблема реализации принципа гуманизма посредством объявления налоговой амнистии, актуальность изучения которой обусловлена отсутствием законодательного закрепления как самого понятия налоговой амнистии, так и процедуры ее проведения. Автором обобщается практический опыт предпосылок объявления налоговой амнистии в России и предлагается иная их система. Выявлены и проанализированы условия, необходимые для обеспечения эффективности и результативности указанного мероприятия. Также отмечена необходимость правового регулирования механизма проведения налоговой амнистии. ; In the article the problem of the realization of humanity principle by the declaration of tax amnesty is considered. The urgency of its study is determined by the absence of legislative consolidation for both the definition of tax amnesty and its procedure. The author generalizes the practical experience of the prerequisites of tax amnesty enactment in Russia and suggests the other system of it. The terms necessary for ensuring the efficiency and productivity of the mentioned procedure are identified and analyzed. The necessity of the legal regulation of the enactment mechanism for tax amnesty is also mentioned.

В статье рассматривается ситуация на рынке продовольствия после введения в августе 2014 г. эмбарго для стран ЕС, США и др. Целью исследования является поиск путей гармоничного сочетания различных элементов и механизмов в агропродовольственной сфере. Сделан анализ по основным видам импорта продовольствия (мясным и молочным продуктам). Источником данных для анализа послужили отчетность Росстата и таможенной статистики. Поквартальная динамика включала также географию поставок продовольствия из стран дальнего и ближнего зарубежья, а также сведения об отечественном производстве по этим видам продуктов. Авторы показывают, что произошло не только снижение уровня поставок, но и замена одних стран-импортеров на другие. В результате анализа авторы пришли к выводу, что импортозамещение, которое произошло в результате введения санкций, является вынужденным и объясняется нехваткой отечественных продовольственных ресурсов. В то же время замещение импортных продуктов питания на отечественные должно разумно сочетаться с наращиванием экспорта по конкурентоспособным видам продукции. Основной вывод авторов необходимость долгосрочной политики протекционизма в агропродовольственной сфере. Результаты исследования могут быть использованы при выработке экономической политики в агропродовольственной сфере.The article discusses the situation on the food market since the introduction in August 2014 embargo for EU countries, USA, etc. The main goal of the study is to find ways of harmonious combination of different elements and mechanisms in the agro-food sphere. An analysis was conducted on the main types of imported food (meat and dairy products). The data source for the analysis was the reporting of statistics of Federal customs service and Federal service of state statistics. Quarterly dynamics also included the geography of the food supply from countries near and far abroad as well as information about domestic production for these types of products. The authors show that not only has there been a decrease in the level of supply, but the replacement of some of the importing countries on the other. Authors concluded that the import substitution, that occurred as a result of sanctions, is forced and due to the lack of domestic food resources. At the same time the replacement of imported foods in the domestic should to be balanced with increased exports of competitive products. The main author's conclusion is the need for a policy of long-term protectionism in agro-food sphere. The results can be used in the formulation of economic policy in the agro-food sphere.

В статье рассмотрены основные тенденции в проведении реформ Анной Леопольдовной в качестве регента при сыне императоре Иване VI Антоновиче в отношении системы высших и центральных органов власти в России. Автором отмечена главная особенность регентства Анны Леопольдовны мелочный, регламентационный характер указов и распоряжений, причиной чего являлось отсутствие знаний и опыта управления огромной империей. ; The article describes the main trends in the reform Anna Leopoldovna as regent for her son Emperor Ivan VI Antonovich in relation to the system of higher and the central government in Russia. The author noted the main feature of the regency of Anne Leopoldovna petty, regulatory manner of decrees and orders, the cause of which was the lack of knowledge and experience in managing a large empire.

Исследуются история появления и основные функции высшего органа власти в России в XVIII в. Кабинета министров императрицы Анны Ивановны. Исследование базируется на использовании законодательных актов времен царствования Анны Ивановны, опубликованных в Полном собрании законов Российской империи, что способствует более глубокому изучению проблемы. Автор подчеркивает особую ситуацию, характерную для России послепетрвских времен, когда в помощь императору создавались новые высшие органы власти наподобие Верховного тайного совета или Кабинета министров. ; The article investigates the history of the emergence and main functions of the supreme organ of power in Russia in the XVIII century -Cabinet of Empress Anna Ivanovna. Having ascended to the throne, Anna Ivanovna knew that her position is complicated. As well as all its predecessors, who came to power after the death of Peter the Great, Empress Anna had no clear idea of how to edit it. Thus, the author emphasizes the special situation characteristic for Russian poslepetrvskih times when the emperor to help create new higher authorities, such as the Supreme Privy Council, or Cabinet. However, the article noted, and other causes of the Cabinet of Ministers, based on changes related to the evolution of absolutism in Russia in the XVIII century. The author notes that the some of the former members of the Supreme Privy Council became part of the Cabinet, suggesting preservation of his influence on public policy. In particular, it included the following former supreme lords: G.I. Golovkin and A.I. Osterman. Cabinet originally consisted of three persons: A.I. Osterman, G.I. Golovkin and A.M. Cherkassky. Research articles on pages based on the use of legislative acts of the reign of Anna Ivanovna, published in the Complete Collection of Laws of the Russian Empire, which contributes to a better understanding of the problem. On the basis of legislation the author concludes that the Cabinet fully obeyed Anna Ivanovna and received extensive rights in domestic and foreign policy, legislation, watched judicial and financial affairs, solve important administrative matters. Decision-making process in the Cabinet to investigate very difficult because there are no transcripts of its sessions. This fact attests to the impossibility to determine not only the debate, but also a personal contribution of each of the work in the office dignitaries. Office, experiencing a gradual but steady process of universalization competencies concentrated in its hands all the threads of government. In relations with colleagues Cabinet tendency to establish relations «domination-submission». The smallest changes were three boards -Military, Admiralty and Foreign Affairs, as well as the College of Justice and lands college. When Anna Ivanovna efforts and political terror in the country, the line was continued to subordinate the church to the state and the transformation of the clergy in a specific kind of autocracy obedient bureaucracy. Thus, the Cabinet of Ministers of the Empress Anna Ivanovna appears primarily administrative authority, functions and powers of which were determined by situational characteristics of the internal political situation.

В статье рассмотрены основные тенденции в проведении реформ Анной Леопольдовной в качестве регента при сыне императоре Иване VI Антоновиче в отношении системы высших и центральных органов власти в России. Автором отмечена главная особенность регентства Анны Леопольдовны мелочный, регламентационный характер указов и распоряжений, причиной чего являлось отсутствие знаний и опыта управления огромной империей. ; The article describes the main trends in the reform Anna Leopoldovna as regent for her son Emperor Ivan VI Antonovich in relation to the system of higher and the central government in Russia. The author noted the main feature of the regency of Anne Leopoldovna petty, regulatory manner of decrees and orders, the cause of which was the lack of knowledge and experience in managing a large empire.

В статье рассмотрены особенности деятельности Боярской думы в конце XVII в., когда лидирующую роль дума постепенно начала утрачивать. Автор характеризует основные статьи Соборного уложения при характеристике думы в указанный период. При Алексее Михайловиче Боярская дума утратила право самостоятельно выносить постановления, имевшие силу закона. Однако Петр I не пошел на ликвидацию думы особым законодательным актом. Царь просто перестал жаловать в думные чины. ; The article examines the activities of the Boyar Duma in the end of XVII century, when the leadership role of the Duma gradually began to lose. The author characterizes the main article of the Cathedral code when the characteristic of the Duma within the period indicated. During Alexis Mikhailovich time, the boyar Duma has lost the right independently to issue resolutions having the force of law. However, Peter I had not gone to the elimination of the Duma of the special act of the legislature. The king simply ceased to bestow in Duma ranks.

Исследуется приказная система в период своего расцвета XVII в. : рассмотрены порядок и время работы, круг компетенций приказов, а также правила оформления приказной документации. Отмечено, что для приказной системы было характерно отсутствие четкого разграничения компетенций отдельных приказов. Сделан вывод, что к концу XVII в. назрела необходимость в реформировании приказной системы, вызванном реалиями Нового времени. ; By the moment of coming to power of Peter I and in the first years of his reign in Russia functions mandative system. Orders emerged in the XVI century. In orders has developed a special control system: the majority of the cases considered by judges of orders or заменявшими their clerks alone, and the contentious cases were subject to peer discussion. The functioning of the orders received legislative confirmation in The congregation this code of 1649 Alexei Mik-hailovich. General principles mandative activities that were still in the rules of the code of laws of Ivan IV 1497 str., included in the Council code in the form of a separate Chapter X "On court", the characteristic of which is presented in the article. The Council code contains a large number of norms, regulating device, the time of work, the internal organization of the functioning of the orders. With the passage of time the norms of the Conciliar code began to complicate and detail the device, the procedure of work and terms of competences orders. Office-work orders in the XVII century was a difficult one. The traditional form of records in the orders were "pillars" or "columns", when the text of the document was written in a narrow paper tape on one side (the downside served for the litter and resolutions), several of these documents "columns" by bonding with each other are processed in the case, in the result of the long "pillar", which could reach several tens, and sometimes hundreds of meters. To complicate the withdrawal of certain documents from the case or their falsification, at its turnover in the places of gluing дьяки wrote his position and name. After the completion of the case it rolled written inside and kept in the form of a book or a roll. Also practised and a storage option documentation. A characteristic feature of the mandative management system was the colour and the uncertainty of the functions of the orders, the absence of a clear delimitation of competences between orders. All orders have legal, financial, administrative functions. In the first quarter of the XVIII century was carried out the whole complex of reforms related to the restructuring of the higher and Central bodies of power. Their essence was the formation of the дворянско-bureaucratic apparatus of the centralized absolutism. Since 1708. Peter the great started to rebuild the old institutions and replace them with new, as a result of which a new system of power. Summing up, we should note that mandative system, which existed in Russia since XVI century up to the beginning of the XVIII century., had a well-coordinated mechanism of functioning. The need to reform it was connected not with errors in the work of the orders, and the need to carry out reforms in Russia in the epoch of New time of Peter I.