Suchergebnisse

Nicolai Hartmann interprets the logic of knowledge as a dialectical process that must reveal the processionality of being itself. Sesemann not only extends Hartmann's philosophical insights, but also supplements them significantly. He also understands the knowledge of reality not as an analysis of static objects, but as a dynamic and temporal reconstruction of becoming reality. Acknowledging the limitations of intuition, he returns to the possibilities of logically formed knowledge. Sesemann argues that the logical constructions of knowledge must maintain a connection with primal intuition. However, logically formed knowledge is limited by its static nature. A dialectic is needed to reveal a dynamically changing being. I will begin the article by discussing the relationship between intuition and logical knowledge, then examine the problem of the ideal being and conclude by evaluating the significance of dialectics in Sesemann's theory of knowledge. According to Sesemann, the dialectic, unlike formal logic, must reveal not the ideal laws of thought, but how live knowledge takes place. Dialectics allows one to analyze being as incomplete and indefinite, as becoming and open to infinite change, it allows one to relate a separate aspect of knowledge to the whole.

This article examines proposals for the reform of the relationship between internal security and state-society relations in Northern Ireland and finds a divergence from the usual liberal package of police reforms. These proposals embraced the political nature of security provision and aimed to create authentically democratic institutions endowed with sufficient power to contest the state's control over the monopoly of force. Through a Habermassian lens, the research analyses the emancipatory potential of these proposals, and examines the reasons why they were rejected in favour of a state-centric, liberal model that did not deliver the structural transformation of police— society relations sought by the people of Northern Ireland.

Intro -- The Dialectic of Capital: A Study of the Inner Logic of Capitalism -- Copyright -- Dedication -- Contents -- Preface to this Edition -- Preface to the First Edition -- Introduction -- A Marxism, Ideology and Science -- B The Significance of the Dialectic -- C Political Economy and Socialism -- Part 1: The Doctrine of Circulation (The Being of Capital) -- Introductory Remarks -- 1 The Form of the Commodity (Quality) -- The Hegel Correspondence -- A The Two Factors of a Commodity Value and Use-value (The Pure Being of Value) -- B The Forms of Value or the Expressions of Value as Exchange-value (The Determinate Being of Value) -- C Money Prices or Values in the Form of Money (The Being-for-Self of Value) -- 2 The Form of Money (Quantity) -- The Hegel Correspondence -- A Money's Function as the Measure of Value (Money as Pure Quantity) -- B Money's Function as the Medium of Circulation (Money as Quantum) -- C Money's Function as the Store of Value -- 3 The Form of Capital (Measure) -- The Hegel Correspondence -- A The Form of Merchant Capital (Capital as Specific Quantum) -- B The Form of Money-Lending Capital (Capital as the Measureless) -- C The Form of Industrial Capital (Capital as Absolute Indifference) -- Part 2: The Doctrine of Production (The Essence of Capital) -- Introductory Remarks -- 4 The Production-process of Capital (Intro-Reflection) -- Introduction -- The Hegel Correspondence -- A The Labour-and-Production Process (The Foundation of Capitalist Production) -- B The Value-Formation-and-Augmentation Process (The Existence of Capitalist Production) -- C The Development of the Capitalist Method of Production Labour-Power as a Commodity (The Thing-in-Itself of Capitalist Production) -- 5 The Circulation-process of Capital (Appearance) -- The Hegel Correspondence.

chapter 1 Introduction: Critical Realism, Hegelian Dialectic and the Problems of Philosophy—Preliminary Considerations -- chapter 2 Dialectic: The Logic of Absence—Arguments, Themes, Perspectives, Configurations -- chapter 3 Dialectical Critical Realism and the Dialectic of Freedom -- chapter 4 Metacritical Dialectics: Irrealism and Its Consequences.

THIS ARTICLE DISCUSSES A NEXUS OF PROBLEMS WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN AT THE CENTER OF MARXIST EPISTEMOLOGICAL DISCUSSION. TAKING AS HIS STARTING POINT THE KANTIAN DISTINCTION BETWEEN CONTRARIETY AND DIALECTICAL CONTRADICTION, HE SYSTEMATICALLY REVIEWS THE CONFUSION WHICH HAS REIGNED ON THE NATURE OF CONTRADICTION FROM ENGELS TO LENIN TO MAO AND KORSCH TO LUKACS AND THE FRANKFURT SCHOOL.

This book was written based on the question "What and Why is the Philosophy of Science?". Until now, it seems that no one can stop the rapid progress of science. Recent history records science as a form of rational human thought with the results of various scientific disciplines and sub-disciplines. Accompanied by suitable methodological materials and buildings, it is well preserved in libraries or scientific institutions such as universities. The progress of science cannot be separated from every discovery that is useful for the advancement of human life.
The book is perfect for a beginner who wants to study the philosophy of science and wants to know the basics of logic. Very helpful for someone who wants or will study philosophy of science. The content of the discussion that contains the history of philosophical thought to the history of methodology in modern science is beneficial for ordinary people who want to know how to develop science. By studying philosophy of science, we try to look again at a more radical and critical view of the history and development of this book.
The book presents several philosophers in several periods and discusses the essays that have been written. This book contains seven chapters beginning with an introductory discussion of philosophy, several branches of science, the history of the development of philosophy, which has been packaged. In the following chapters, this book discusses the basics of logic, how to present the philosophy of science, to discuss the influence of philosophical thought on modernity.
Reviewing the book entitled "Filsafat Ilmu dan Logika: Dialektika Perubahan (Philosophy of Science and Logic: Dialectics of Change)", the reviewer has several reasons he chose this book. Books are by the provisions and themes given by the philosophy of science lecturers. The purpose of reviewing this book is to provide a brief description based on the author's reading experience of the contents in the book. This paper is addressed to someone who will read this book.

Preliminary Material /Christopher J. Arthur --The New Turn to Dialectic /Christopher J. Arthur --Dialectical Development versus Linear Logic /Christopher J. Arthur --Labour, Value and Negativity /Christopher J. Arthur --Systematic Dialectic /Christopher J. Arthur --Marx's 'Capital' and Hegel's 'Logic' /Christopher J. Arthur --Negation of the Negation in Marx's 'Capital' /Christopher J. Arthur --The Infinity of Capital /Christopher J. Arthur --The Spectre of Capital /Christopher J. Arthur --Hegel's Theory of the Value Form /Christopher J. Arthur --A Clock without a Spring: Epitaph for the USSR /Christopher J. Arthur --Whose Reason? and Whose Revolution? /Christopher J. Arthur --Conclusion /Christopher J. Arthur --Bibliography /Christopher J. Arthur --Index /Christopher J. Arthur --Historicalmaterialism Book Series /Christopher J. Arthur.