Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α‐amylase from the genetically modified Bacillus licheniformis strain DP‐Dzb45
In: EFSA journal, Band 18, Heft 11
ISSN: 1831-4732
212 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: EFSA journal, Band 18, Heft 11
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 18, Heft 7
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 17, Heft 11
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 17, Heft 10
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 17, Heft 6
ISSN: 1831-4732
The EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) was requested to deliver a scientific opinion on the implications for human health of the flavouring substance 4‐amino‐5‐(3‐(isopropylamino)‐2,2‐dimethyl‐3‐oxopropoxy)‐2‐methylquinoline‐3‐carboxylic acid [FL‐no: 16.130], in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 407 (FGE.407), according to Regulation (EC) No 1331/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council. The substance has not been reported to occur in natural source materials of botanical or animal origin. It is intended to be used as both the parent compound and its hemisulfate monohydrate salt as a flavouring substance with modifying properties in specific categories of food. The chronic dietary exposure to the substance estimated using the added portions exposure technique (APET), is calculated to be 882 μg/person per day for a 60‐kg adult and 547 μg/person per day for a 15‐kg 3‐year‐old child. There is no concern with respect to genotoxicity. A 90‐day dietary administration study in rats showed no adverse effects for doses up to 100 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, providing an adequate margin of safety. Developmental toxicity was not observed in a study with rats at the dose levels up to 1,000 mg/kg bw per day. The Panel concluded that [FL‐no: 16.130] and its hemisulfate monohydrate salt are not expected to be of safety concern at the estimated levels of dietary exposure calculated using the APET approach. This conclusion applies only to the use of the substance as a flavour modifier as requested and when used at the levels as specified for foods from different food categories.
BASE
In: EFSA journal, Band 6, Heft 7
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 22, Heft 7
ISSN: 1831-4732
Abstract
The food enzyme α‐amylase (4‐α‐d‐glucan glucanohydrolase i.e. EC 3.2.1.1) is produced with the non‐genetically modified Cellulosimicrobium funkei strain AE‐AMT by Amano Enzyme Inc. A safety evaluation of this food enzyme was made previously, in which EFSA concluded that the food enzyme did not give rise to safety concerns when used in seven food manufacturing processes. Subsequently, the applicant has requested to extend its use to include three additional processes. In this assessment, EFSA updated the safety evaluation of this food enzyme when used in a total of ten food manufacturing processes. As the food enzyme‐total organic solids (TOS) are removed from the final foods in one food manufacturing process, the dietary exposure to the food enzyme‐TOS was estimated only for the remaining nine processes. The dietary exposure was calculated to be up to 0.049 mg TOS/kg body weight (bw) per day in European populations. When combined with the no observed adverse effect level previously reported (230 mg TOS/kg bw per day, the highest dose tested), the Panel derived a margin of exposure of at least 4694. Based on the data provided for the previous evaluation and the revised margin of exposure in the present evaluation, the Panel concluded that this food enzyme does not give rise to safety concerns under the intended conditions of use.
In: EFSA journal, Band 22, Heft 5
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 22, Heft 3
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 22, Heft 2
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 22, Heft 1
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 21, Heft 11
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 21, Heft 11
ISSN: 1831-4732
In: EFSA journal, Band 21, Heft 10
ISSN: 1831-4732