Search results

el presente escrito es parte de una investigación interesadaen indagar por las concepciones y repercusiones de lanoción de ciudadanía en jóvenes campesinos de la ciudadde Bogotá, en particular interesó recabar la manera quecomo se conciben a sí mismos en tanto ciudadanos queparticipan de lo público y las tensiones experimentan.Los referentes fueron los esquemas de ciudadanía liberal,republicana, comunitarista y mestiza, de los cuales lamayoría de estudiantes participa de alguna manera.Palabras clave: ciudadanía – ruralidad – subjetividadpolítica – jóvenes campesinos ; This writing is a part of a research interested in inquiring about perceptions and impact of citizenship notion of peasant young individuals of Bogota. In particular, there was an interest in stressing on how they imagine themselves as citizens who participate of the public, and tensions they undergo. Schemes of liberal citizenship, republican, community, and mestizo were taken as a reference, in which most students participate in any manner.

"In China, strong economic growth over the past four decades, accelerated urbanisation and multiple inequalities between urban and rural worlds have driven the escalation of internal and international migrations. The internal migration of workers represents a unique phenomenon since the reform and opening of China. Less-qualified young migrants are living in subaltern conditions and young migrant graduates have strongly internalised the idea of being the "heroes" of the new Chinese society in a context of emotional capitalism. But internal and international migrations intersect and intertwine, young internal and international migrants from China produce economic cosmopolitanisms in Chinese society and through top-down, bottom-up and intermediary globalisation. The young Chinese migrant incarnates the Global Individual, what we labeled here as the Compressed Individual"--

According to Bertrand Russell, Nietzsche's only value is the flourishing of the exceptional individual. The well-being of ordinary people is, in itself, without value. Yet there are passages in Nietzsche that appear to regard the flourishing of the community as a whole alongside, perhaps even above, that of the exceptional individual. The ten essays that comprise this volume wrestle with the tension between individual and community in Nietzsche's writings. Some defend a reading close to Russell's. Others suggest that Nietzsche's highest value is the flourishing of the community as a whole and that exceptional individuals find their highest value only in promoting that flourishing. In viewing Nietzsche from the perspective of community, the essays also cast new light on other aspects of his philosophy, for instance, his ideal of scientific research and his philosophy of language

I have argued two points. Firstly, Skocpol has confused peasant autonomy and peasantstate alliances. The relationship between autonomy and revolt is spurious. Secondly, peasant solidarity is neither a necessary nor a sufficient cause of peasant revolt. It is not necessary because revolt concentrated in a specific niche in a peasant community cannot be attributed to peasant solidarity. Nor is solidarity sufficient, because it has effects only in communities with relatively high skill levels. When solidarity does have independent social effects, it is as a community norm and tends to be associated with a sort of revolt that is not intended to change the lord—peasant relationship.