Search results

3 p. A news release on University of Oregon News Bureau letterhead regarding a new policy statement of the UO Student Publications Board. The policy states that the university will not be held responisble for censoring individual student publications, yet urges students to maintain high standards in their publications.

4 p., ill., Student Publication, V. 1 No. 3, Jan. 11 1980; B.C. Forecasts 2.25 Million; Iran: Situation Critical; Seniors Organized; Bruins Bust a Blast; To Whom it May Concern; Vangrancy; Prof. H. P.; Between the Lines Jailbird; Poetry Corner; You Be the Judge; B.C. Begins Seasons Winning; Winchell Names Man of the Year; Blazing Saddles Comes to Bellevue; Introducing Dean Herbener; Not Too Personal Ads

16 p., ill., Student Publication, Parch 22 1993; VUE Interviews Nebraska Governor Ben Nelson; NCAA Div. 1 Creighton Bluejays Fall Before Bruins Onslaught; Organizational Change Prepares B.C. for the 21st Century; Where are Ethics and Integrity in American Business?; Letters to the Editor; Link Between Smoking and Illiteracy?; Hoagland Deals with Spending Cuts, Aggressive Crowd; The Lincoln Report; 1993 Marks Another Successful Year for Red Cross Support at Bellevue College; Governor Paints a Hopeful Picture of the Future; A Sketch of a Successful Governor; E. Benjamin Nelson; Art Feature; Who is Yasu?; International Fun Night; Prof. Smith Published Civil War Book; Lancer B. C. Student Profiles

The Supreme Court's ruling in Christian Legal Society v. Martinez allows a public university to institute a "take-all-comers" nondiscrimination policy for student organizations. In doing do, the Court adds new perils and expands existing hazards for student publications. First, the Christian Legal Society majority overlooks the possibility that safeguards for the rights of student organizations generally may not adequately protect the unique interests of student publications. In addition, the ruling creates a misleading impression of the degree of deference courts owe the pedagogical judgments of public university administrators.

AimTo analyse through an exploratory descriptive survey how former and current doctoral students' publications have contributed to the development of evidence between the establishment of the doctoral schools of nursing between 2006 - 2015.Design An exploratory descriptive survey.Methods We analysed the papers published in peer-reviewed journals by the four Italian PhD Schools of Nursing between 2006 - 2015. Additional missing information was retrieved from Web of Science.Results We identified 478 scientific papers. The papers increased from 12 in 2006 to 110 in 2015. Most are published in 29 journals, of which 15 have an impact factor ranging between 0.236-3.755. These results show the increasingly significant contribution of nursing doctoral programs to the production of evidence, which can be used to improve the quality of nursing and inform health policies. Nursing doctoral schools deserve a greater recognition, especially by Italian funding agencies and political institutions.

AIM: To analyse through an exploratory descriptive survey how former and current doctoral students' publications have contributed to the development of evidence between the establishment of the doctoral schools of nursing in 2006–2015. DESIGN: An exploratory descriptive survey. METHODS: We analysed the papers published in peer‐reviewed journals by the four Italian PhD Schools of Nursing between 2006–2015. Additional missing information was retrieved from Web of Science. RESULTS: We identified 478 scientific papers. The papers increased from 12 in 2006–110 in 2015. Most are published in 29 journals, of which 15 had an impact factor ranging between 0.236–3.755. These results show the increasingly significant contribution of nursing doctoral programmes to the production of evidence, which can be used to improve the quality of nursing and inform health policies. Nursing doctoral schools deserve a greater recognition, especially by Italian funding agencies and political institutions.