Search results

This study evaluates infrastructure investment and finance in Asia from a global perspective. It provides an overview on infrastructure needs and the various sources of private finance, globally and within Asia, and creates a "bigger picture" for the demand and supply of capital for infrastructure by using a simple framework, i.e., percentages of gross domestic product. The picture is expectedly not uniform across Asia, but some interesting features emerge from global comparisons. Overall, the private sector still plays a relatively subdued role. Bank loans dominate private infrastructure finance, and there is much scope for the further development of capital markets. The volumes of listed and unlisted investment instruments, of project finance and of public-private partnerships, are still small in relation to investment needs and well below the global average. However, there are some notable exceptions. Institutional investors are widely seen as a new financing source for infrastructure. There are some distinctive features in Asia, such as the prominence of large pension reserve funds and sovereign wealth funds, and comparatively weak private long-term savings institutions. The current asset allocation to infrastructure by domestic investors is overall very low, and the attractiveness for foreign investors still sub-par. Expectations on the future involvement of investors in this field should be realistic, and there are barriers and risks that need to be worked on. Asian governments can take steps to attract more private capital.

PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: COSTS, BENEFITS AND EFFICIENCIES -- PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: COSTS, BENEFITS AND EFFICIENCIES -- LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA -- Contents -- Preface -- Chapter 1 COSTS, BENEFITS, AND EFFICIENCIES OF PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS FOR FIXED GUIDEWAY CAPITAL PROJECTS -- 1. Introduction -- A. Purpose -- B. Scope -- 2. Types of PPPs in Transit -- A. PPPs Defined -- B. Types of PPPs -- Design-Bid-Build -- Design-Build -- Design-Build-Operate-Maintain and Build-Operate-Transfer

The book brings frameworks and research issues in public private partnerships in terms of its structure, governance, global practices and financing. --Book Jacket.

The public sector today permeates much of society. This wide-ranging reach is distilled into a cogent overview of governing in the twenty-first century in the latest edition of Johnson's acclaimed work. In a clear and engaging style, the author examines the public-private collaborations through which public policies are shaped, implemented, and revised. Throughout, he emphasizes the role of public administrators in forming and maintaining the partnerships that advance the goals of government

Although public–private partnerships (PPPs) are frequently analyzed and lauded in terms of efficiency, their impact on public values is often neglected. As a result, there is little empirical evidence supporting or rejecting the claim that PPPs have a negative effect on public values. This case study provides valuable insight into the relationship between public values in PPPs and the circumstances affecting the degree to which public values are upheld. Research findings demonstrate that whether public values are at stake in PPPs cannot be answered with a simple yes or no. Rather, public values can be threatened, safeguarded, or even strengthened depending on the project phase and the specific facet of the public value under scrutiny. Insight into which circumstances influence the safeguarding of public values in DBFMO (design–build–finance–maintain–operate) projects unravels the strengths and weaknesses of PPPs in terms of public values, providing public managers with a starting point for optimization.