Search results

The K6 scale is a shortened version of the K10, a 10‐question scale originally developed to provide an efficient population‐level screen for serious mental disorders (SMI) in the USA. Evidence that the six‐item shortened version performed as well as the original 10‐item version, coupled with strong psychometric properties, led to rapid dissemination and replicated validation of the K6 in a number of other countries around the world. Based on these results, the K6 is now often included in large general‐purpose government health tracking surveys in a number of different countries. Until now, though, the scoring rules for the K6 in these surveys were inconsistent. The first paper in this special issue introduces the K6 scale and summarizes the results of a series of investigations to resolve these inconsistencies by providing optimal scoring rules for the K6 in 14 countries. Subsequent papers explore the usefulness of the K6 to screen for serious emotional disturbance among adolescents and report findings from validation efforts based on independent diagnostic assessments as well as of other measures of impairment and disability (World Health organization Disability Assessment Scale). Finally a highly innovative analysis using a Bayesian multilevel modeling approach is presented, designed to estimate the prevalence of SMI in small areas, such as cities, states, or schools, from surveys carried out in a larger population that includes only relatively small samples of respondents in each of the areas in which prevalence estimates are to be made. Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the K6 is an efficient and useful screening tool. The psychometric and methodological explorations will hopefully stimulate additional interest in the use of short screening scales in large‐scale general health surveys to supplement the more in‐depth information obtained in periodic psychiatric epidemiological surveys on the basis of diagnostic interviews. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Introduction: This paper does not aim to predict the future of clinical psychology in Germany. The future of psychology depends on the complex interaction between political, sociological, economic and health-care related factors as well as on the scientific progress in the discipline itself and in neighbour disciplines. However, it is fair to say that clinical psychology continues to gain even stronger influences in health care and will face a number of new challenges over the next years of its expansion. Our paper will present some of these potential fields of development and change based on a brief description of the status quo. The focus of the article will be specific developments in Germany, although there will be an overlap with general tendencies that describe the situation of clinical psychology in the new millenium in general. Furthermore, for research as well as practice, the specific relationship between clinical psychology and psyciatry will be highlighted.

First use and initiation of regular alcohol use has been frequently found to start in adolescence. However, only few studies have also investigated how many adolescents proceed during ages 14–24 to harmful drinking or even develop alcohol use disorders. This paper – using the EDSP baseline sample of 3,021 community respondents from the Munich area – examines the prevalence of use, abuse and dependence and investigates the dose/disorder relationship. Alcohol abuse was reported by 9.7% of respondents and alcohol dependence by 6.2%. Men were more likely to report an alcohol disorder than women, prevalence also increased in the older age cohorts. However, even among 14- to 17-year-olds a substantial proportion of respondents report high and regular consumption rates, the occurrence of abuse and dependence criteria and even a full dependence syndrome. There is however only a moderate association between average number of standard drinks consumed with the risk of developing abuse and dependence. In light of the substantial rates among adolescents and young adults the validity of DSM-IV alcohol disorder criteria is discussed.

Ths paper describes the distribution of dependence criteria and diagnoses in a sample of 14- to 24-year-olds from Munich, Germany (n = 3,021; 71% response rate), evaluates differences between nondependent and dependent smokers and examines associations of smoking with other substances, affective and anxiety disorders. Assessment was made using the M-CIDI. The lifetime prevalence of DSM-IV nicotine dependence in the total sample is 19%, rising to 52% among regular smokers. No gender differences were seen in the progression from regular smoking to nicotine dependence, although men were more likely than women to initiate regular use. Analysis of daily cigarette use identified a significant dose-response relationship with the number of endorsed DSM-IV dependence criteria with unsuccessful cut-backs being the most prevalent criterion. As compared to nondependent smokers, dependent smokers were more likely to associate negative health effects with smoking and to have a desire to change and attempt a change in their pattern of use. Regular use of nicotine was found to be significantly associated with other substance and nonsubstance disorders, although dependent regular use was more strongly associated with these disorders than nondependent regular use. These results indicate that daily smoking is a behavior which is resistant to change despite an expressed desire and repeated cut-back attempts. Although initiation of regular smoking among nonsmokers does not occur frequently after the early twenties, the risk for dependent smoking among regular users persists into adulthood and is associated with a range of mental disorders.

Mental disorders affect a huge number of people and have a major economic impact due to treatment costs and lost productivity. Society and politics need to acknowledge this huge toll in order to better support the healthcare systems that deal with these disorders.

This paper provides an overview of the theoretical framework of the Psychological Sciences' reviews and describes how improved psychological research can foster our understanding of mental health and mental disorders in a complementary way to biomedical research. Core definitions of the field and of psychological interventions and treatment in particular are provided. The work group's consensus regarding strength and weaknesses of European Union (EU) research in critical areas is summarized, highlighting the potential of a broader comprehensive "Behaviour Science programme" in forthcoming programmatic EU funding programmes.

This paper provides an overview of the theoretical framework of the Psychological Sciences' reviews and describes how improved psychological research can foster our understanding of mental health and mental disorders in a complementary way to biomedical research. Core definitions of the field and of psychological interventions and treatment in particular are provided. The work group's consensus regarding strength and weaknesses of European Union (EU) research in critical areas is summarized, highlighting the potential of a broader comprehensive "Behaviour Science programme" in forthcoming programmatic EU funding programmes. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.