Search results

AbstractThe doctrine of the national margin of appreciation is well established in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. In applying this essentially judge-made doctrine, the Court imposes self-restraint on its power of review, accepting that domestic authorities are best placed to settle a dispute. The areas in which the doctrine has most often been applied will be presented here, looking at various examples from case law. After a brief overview of the doctrine's origin, the analysis will focus on the situations in which the margin has been allowed or denied. Does it relate merely to factual and domestic-law aspects of a case? What is the scope of the margin of appreciation when it comes to interpreting provisions of the European Convention on Human Rights? What impact does an interference (whether disproportionate or not) with a guaranteed right have on the margin allowed? Is there a second-degree or 'reverse' margin of appreciation, whereby discretionary powers can be distributed between executive and judicial authorities at domestic level? Lastly it is noteworthy that Protocol No 14, now ratified by all Council of Europe Member States, enshrines in Article 12—at least to some extent—an obligation to apply a margin of appreciation. One essential question remains: by allowing any margin of a certain width, is the European Court simply waiving its power of review or is it attributing responsibility to the domestic courts in the interest of a healthy subsidiarity?

Surrogacy cases throw light on the role of the court /Lady Justice Arden --Le droit au respect de la vie familiale des personnes détenues /Marie-Aude Beernaert --Petit Aide-Mémoire pour la Cour de Strasbourg /Vincent Berger --Human rights waivers and the right to do wrong under the ECHR /Samantha Besson --Language-related complaints under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights: striking the right balance /James Brannan --Lever le voile sur la surveillance secrète: le droit au respect de la vie privée face à l'activité des services de renseignement /Véronique Bruck --Protocol no. 16 and EU law /Johan Callewaert --The primacy of the right of access to justice over the undue invocation of state immunities in face of international crimes /Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade --La procréation médicalement assistée devant la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme: évolutions et impact /Guillem Cano Palomares --Two variations on a theme: privacy amd reputation /Leto Cariolou --Konstantin Markin v Russia and its consequences: the comet's tail /Olga Chernishova --La cour européenne des droits de l'homme protège-t-elle assez le droit à la réputation, et de qui? /Jean-Paul Costa.