123 Finding Optimal Methods for SbD Hazard Testing of Nanomaterials: The Effect of Cell Model and Exposure Method on Cytokine Response
In: Annals of work exposures and health: addressing the cause and control of work-related illness and injury, Volume 67, Issue Supplement_1, p. i67-i68
ISSN: 2398-7316
Abstract
The concept of safe-by-design (SbD) can help toxicologists and risk assessors to keep pace with the rapidly expanding field of nanotechnology. As part of SbD, the hazard potential of a new nanomaterial (NM) is identified at the first stages of product development. For this, simple yet predictive toxicity assays are crucial. We investigated the suitability of several in vitro models and exposure methods to predict the human (pulmonary) inflammation potential of NMs. Four silica NMs were selected of which in vivo pulmonary toxicity ranking had previously been established: DQ12 (quartz) > NM-203 (fumed silica) > Colloidal silica > Silanized colloidal silica. Several cell types including a 3D human airway epithelial model, lung epithelial cell lines, and immune cell lines, either in mono- or co-culture were exposed to the four materials either in a submerged setting or at the air-liquid interface (ALI). After 24 hours of exposure, cytokine response was assessed using either 13-plex LegendPlex, ELISA, or qPCR, and toxicity rankings were compared. The results indicate differences in sensitivity between cell models and exposure methods. Submerged exposure of a cell-line seems a suitable first tier for SbD hazard testing in case of NMs that can easily be dispersed. For NMs that are not compatible with submerged testing, ALI exposure might be needed. Higher tier testing might be used to confirm the ranking.