Search results

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

International audience ; Although a necessary approach in many cases, implementing Marine Spatial Planning (MSP) reveals discrepancies between theory and practice. These discrepancies include the major importance given to technical issues along with the role and meaning ascribed to the "spatial" dimension at the expense of the "strategic" one. This gives rise to questions especially from the point of view of fisheries that invite to develop a more in-depth critical analysis of MSP. Far from considering the technical and political dimensions in opposition, the goal is to find out whether the reasoning used can be turned around, or in other words, whether the potential of a mapping instrument can be used to give greater importance and more visibility to strategic questions in MSP processes. Our reflection is based on methods used to map fisheries. It is also enhanced by notions such as empowerment and asserting the value of non-scientific knowledge in-situ. To test the strengths and shortcomings of this idea, it was applied in the context of an ongoing 2010 experiment between scientists (geographers and statisticians), fishers and fishers' representatives in metropolitan France. They have been working together for several years and have gradually expanded their scope to now include almost three-quarters of French metropolitan fleets (around 3250 vessels). This experiment shows that fishers and their representatives are not only able to generate spatial data using robust methods (almost 6000 surveys have already been conducted), but more importantly that they are also able to draw on this knowledge and participate in debates in a more effective manner, taking on the role of "real actors". This has enabled a more political alternative to take shape, full of promise and giving rise to new questions.

Rapport annuel sur Les pratiques de solidarité informelles. Enquête longitudinale sur les modalités, ressources et contraintes de l'entraide au sein du territoire de Nantes Métropole. Dans le cadre de l'Observatoire des Solidarités, la mission « Politique de la Ville » de Nantes Métropole et l'Agence d'Urbanisme de la Région Nantaise (AURAN) souhaitaient mettre en place un travail d'enquête, afin de repérer les initiatives citoyennes qui permettent de renforcer les solidarités. Ce travail à caractère opérationnel vise à développer et renforcer les politiques publiques.En 2015-2016, l'enquête sur les solidarités informelles a eu pour objectif d'étudier plus précisément au sein du panel :1. comment les enquêtés conçoivent la solidarité, sa définition, son périmètre ;2. comment ont évolué leurs pratiques quant aux aides les plus significatives ressorties de l'enquête 2014-2015 ;3. comment ils s'approprient différentes initiatives proposées par des enquêtés en 2014-2015 : les services d'échange locaux, le covoiturage de proximité, l'entraide autour des enfants ;4. quel est leur usage des NTIC (nouvelle technologie de l'information et de la communication) en la matière.Il s'agissait également de pouvoir toucher deux publics-cibles sous-représentés dans le panel : les habitants du parc social locatif avec une enquête complémentaire sur le quartier de la Halvêque (Nantes) ; les « jeunes » adultes de 18 à 30 ans vivant dans l'agglomération nantaise.

Rapport annuel sur Les pratiques de solidarité informelles. Enquête longitudinale sur les modalités, ressources et contraintes de l'entraide au sein du territoire de Nantes Métropole. Dans le cadre de l'Observatoire des Solidarités, la mission « Politique de la Ville » de Nantes Métropole et l'Agence d'Urbanisme de la Région Nantaise (AURAN) souhaitaient mettre en place un travail d'enquête, afin de repérer les initiatives citoyennes qui permettent de renforcer les solidarités. Ce travail à caractère opérationnel vise à développer et renforcer les politiques publiques.En 2015-2016, l'enquête sur les solidarités informelles a eu pour objectif d'étudier plus précisément au sein du panel :1. comment les enquêtés conçoivent la solidarité, sa définition, son périmètre ;2. comment ont évolué leurs pratiques quant aux aides les plus significatives ressorties de l'enquête 2014-2015 ;3. comment ils s'approprient différentes initiatives proposées par des enquêtés en 2014-2015 : les services d'échange locaux, le covoiturage de proximité, l'entraide autour des enfants ;4. quel est leur usage des NTIC (nouvelle technologie de l'information et de la communication) en la matière.Il s'agissait également de pouvoir toucher deux publics-cibles sous-représentés dans le panel : les habitants du parc social locatif avec une enquête complémentaire sur le quartier de la Halvêque (Nantes) ; les « jeunes » adultes de 18 à 30 ans vivant dans l'agglomération nantaise.

Rapport annuel sur Les pratiques de solidarité informelles. Enquête longitudinale sur les modalités, ressources et contraintes de l'entraide au sein du territoire de Nantes Métropole. Dans le cadre de l'Observatoire des Solidarités, la mission « Politique de la Ville » de Nantes Métropole et l'Agence d'Urbanisme de la Région Nantaise (AURAN) souhaitaient mettre en place un travail d'enquête, afin de repérer les initiatives citoyennes qui permettent de renforcer les solidarités. Ce travail à caractère opérationnel vise à développer et renforcer les politiques publiques.En 2015-2016, l'enquête sur les solidarités informelles a eu pour objectif d'étudier plus précisément au sein du panel :1. comment les enquêtés conçoivent la solidarité, sa définition, son périmètre ;2. comment ont évolué leurs pratiques quant aux aides les plus significatives ressorties de l'enquête 2014-2015 ;3. comment ils s'approprient différentes initiatives proposées par des enquêtés en 2014-2015 : les services d'échange locaux, le covoiturage de proximité, l'entraide autour des enfants ;4. quel est leur usage des NTIC (nouvelle technologie de l'information et de la communication) en la matière.Il s'agissait également de pouvoir toucher deux publics-cibles sous-représentés dans le panel : les habitants du parc social locatif avec une enquête complémentaire sur le quartier de la Halvêque (Nantes) ; les « jeunes » adultes de 18 à 30 ans vivant dans l'agglomération nantaise.

Rapport annuel sur Les pratiques de solidarité informelles. Enquête longitudinale sur les modalités, ressources et contraintes de l'entraide au sein du territoire de Nantes Métropole. Dans le cadre de l'Observatoire des Solidarités, la mission « Politique de la Ville » de Nantes Métropole et l'Agence d'Urbanisme de la Région Nantaise (AURAN) souhaitaient mettre en place un travail d'enquête, afin de repérer les initiatives citoyennes qui permettent de renforcer les solidarités. Ce travail à caractère opérationnel vise à développer et renforcer les politiques publiques.En 2015-2016, l'enquête sur les solidarités informelles a eu pour objectif d'étudier plus précisément au sein du panel :1. comment les enquêtés conçoivent la solidarité, sa définition, son périmètre ;2. comment ont évolué leurs pratiques quant aux aides les plus significatives ressorties de l'enquête 2014-2015 ;3. comment ils s'approprient différentes initiatives proposées par des enquêtés en 2014-2015 : les services d'échange locaux, le covoiturage de proximité, l'entraide autour des enfants ;4. quel est leur usage des NTIC (nouvelle technologie de l'information et de la communication) en la matière.Il s'agissait également de pouvoir toucher deux publics-cibles sous-représentés dans le panel : les habitants du parc social locatif avec une enquête complémentaire sur le quartier de la Halvêque (Nantes) ; les « jeunes » adultes de 18 à 30 ans vivant dans l'agglomération nantaise.

Rapport annuel sur Les pratiques de solidarité informelles. Enquête longitudinale sur les modalités, ressources et contraintes de l'entraide au sein du territoire de Nantes Métropole. Dans le cadre de l'Observatoire des Solidarités, la mission « Politique de la Ville » de Nantes Métropole et l'Agence d'Urbanisme de la Région Nantaise (AURAN) souhaitaient mettre en place un travail d'enquête, afin de repérer les initiatives citoyennes qui permettent de renforcer les solidarités. Ce travail à caractère opérationnel vise à développer et renforcer les politiques publiques.En 2015-2016, l'enquête sur les solidarités informelles a eu pour objectif d'étudier plus précisément au sein du panel :1. comment les enquêtés conçoivent la solidarité, sa définition, son périmètre ;2. comment ont évolué leurs pratiques quant aux aides les plus significatives ressorties de l'enquête 2014-2015 ;3. comment ils s'approprient différentes initiatives proposées par des enquêtés en 2014-2015 : les services d'échange locaux, le covoiturage de proximité, l'entraide autour des enfants ;4. quel est leur usage des NTIC (nouvelle technologie de l'information et de la communication) en la matière.Il s'agissait également de pouvoir toucher deux publics-cibles sous-représentés dans le panel : les habitants du parc social locatif avec une enquête complémentaire sur le quartier de la Halvêque (Nantes) ; les « jeunes » adultes de 18 à 30 ans vivant dans l'agglomération nantaise.