Cover -- Half Title -- Title Page -- Copyright Page -- Contents -- Introduction to the Transaction Edition:Fifty Years of Politics on Television -- Preface -- 1. The Television Image -- 2. The Unique Perspective of Television: MacArthur Day -- 3. The First Televised Conventions: 1952 -- 4. Ordeal Before Television: The Kennedy-Nixon Debates -- 5. Late Voters and Early Returns -- 6. Watergate: Television as a Unifying Force -- 7. Debate and Dilemmas: Carter Versus Ford -- 8. The Question of "Reality
Access options:
The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
An examination of the reception given Personal Influence when first published points to highly selective interpretations of the findings. The claims reviewers made for the influence of interpersonal communication relative to the mass media, especially in the political process, went even beyond those advanced by the authors. They overlooked not only the very restricted conceptualization of "effects" that guided the Decatur research but also previously accumulated evidence on multiple kinds of media influence. This article argues that the new conventional wisdom pitting personal versus mass media effects associated with this and previous studies in the Columbia tradition discouraged, however inadvertently, a coming generation of sociologists from researching the effects—particularly long-range effects—of mass communication. As a consequence, academic sociology came to cede much of the high ground it once occupied in media studies to political science and to more professionally oriented departments or schools of communication.
An examination of the reception given Personal Influence when first published points to highly selective interpretations of the findings. The claims reviewers made for the influence of interpersonal communication relative to the mass media, especially in the political process, went even beyond those advanced by the authors. They overlooked not only the very restricted conceptualization of "effects" that guided the Decatur research but also previously accumulated evidence on multiple kinds of media influence. This article argues that the new conventional wisdom pitting personal versus mass media effects associated with this & previous studies in the Columbia tradition discouraged, however inadvertently, a coming generation of sociologists from researching the effects-particularly long-range effects-of mass communication. As a consequence, academic sociology came to cede much of the high ground it once occupied in media studies to political science & to more professionally oriented departments or schools of communication. Figures, References. [Reprinted by permission of Sage Publications Inc., copyright 2006 The American Academy of Political and Social Science.]
