Search results

"Contents" -- "Preface" -- "Acknowledgments" -- "Introduction: Grass is Not Greener" -- "1. From Medicine to Menace: Drug Cannabis in the Southwest and Beyond,1851–1935" -- "2. Prohibition Is for the Birds Nature, Race, and the Marihuana Tax Act" -- "3. Workers' Weed: Cannabis and Labor in the Rural West" -- "4. Seeding the Nation: Cannabis and the Counterculture, 1960–1980" -- "5. Black Market Blues: Capitalized Cannabis and the Environment, 1980–1996" -- "6. Legalizing It: Medical Cannabis and the Push for a Sustainable Future" -- "Conclusion: Our Best Root Forward" -- "Notes" -- "Select Books on Cannabis

AbstractRailway reform in the past decade has seen the introduction of mandated third party access to track in a number of jurisdictions. This article argues that third party access changes the property rights associated with railway track, rendering it a common pool resource. As such, it is useful to ask whether the literature on the governance of common pool resources could inform the economic regulation of railways. This article suggests that it might, and draws some lessons from the common pool resource governance mechanisms traditionally used by Australia's Aborigines in managing their land that may have application within the context of the railways.

Abstract Third‐party access to rail infrastructure in Western Australia's Pilbara region is a contentious issue due to concerns about how third‐party trains might impact on incumbents' operations. A recent State Government proposal involves a haulage regime, rather than access by third‐party trains. This article explores the ramifications of haulage by examining voluntary haulage in the United States. It finds, with some caveats, that haulage seems more appropriate to the Pilbara situation than access.