AbstractThis paper examines the temporal dynamics of newcomer voice and silence in organizations, focusing on the role of organizational socialization. While prior research has explored the antecedents and effects of newcomer voice behaviour, little attention has been given to how voice and silence evolve over time as newcomers become more familiar with their roles and the organizational context. Drawing on multiple goal pursuit theory, this study investigates how organizational socialization influences the trajectories of newcomer promotive voice, prohibitive voice and employee silence. We test our hypotheses on a sample of 198 organizational newcomers over four waves of data, employing random coefficient growth models. The findings suggest that employee voice and silence follow distinct trajectories and provide partial support for the influence of organizational socialization on these changes in newcomer behaviour. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
This article explores whether a top management team's (TMT) behavioural integration relates to the work outcomes of employees. We first discuss likely theoretical mechanisms for such a relationship by integrating the literature on top management team behavioural integration with the literature on organizational climate, productive energy and employee work outcomes. Subsequently, we test our hypotheses in a dataset containing the responses of 191 top management team members and 5048 employees from 63 organizations by using structural equation modelling. The results show that top management team behavioural integration is related positively to an organization's productive energy, which in turn is related to employees' increased job satisfaction and decreased turnover intentions. By providing first insights into the consequences of top management team behavioural integration for employees, this article opens a new avenue for scientific inquiry on the organizational impact of top management team behaviour.
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Volume 32, Issue 4, p. 520-537
ABSTRACTEncouraging pro‐environmental behaviour (PEB) is an environmental and societal concern. Encouraging PEB focussing on how consumers see themselves (their identity) has blossomed. However, a theoretical assessment of this research is missing. Three main identity theories seem to best explain the research, specifically, and two‐fold, identity, and social identity theory (SIT), collectively known as the unified identity theory (UIT), and place identity theory (PIT). As these theories overlap more than differ in their understanding of identity, we argue that combining these theories is needed to avoid redundancies in identity theorizing, provide a universal approach to identity in terms of the processes and outcomes, and explain the PEB research most succinctly. Therefore, we understand identity similarly between the theories and offer a universal identity theory approach based on the theoretical definitions and assumptions. Finally, we demonstrate how the theory can be used to explain the research. Next, research was identified by conducting a systematic review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses guidelines, where 62 studies were relevant. Multiple identities relevant for a given PEB are assumed and evidenced: 99. Identities are assumed to be either individually‐, group‐, and/or place‐focused, drawing on the specific subsets of the universal theory: identity theory, social identity theory, and place identity theory, respectively. Identities are assumed to relate to behaviour, where identity increased PEB with medium effect sizes. Finally, to move the field forward, we provide a theoretical framework of how to test identities in relation to other psychological variables relevant for PEB research.
Past research suggests that power asymmetry within teams can have a stifling effect on team learning and performance. We argue here that this effect is contingent on whether power advantages within a team are used to advance individual or collective interests. This study considers the moderating role of one factor that can influence the individual or collective orientation of team members—the type of performance feedback that a team receives. We propose that whereas individual feedback reinforces the negative effects of power asymmetry on team learning, group feedback fosters a collective orientation within a team that transforms power differences into a stimulus for team learning. Analysis of multisource, multimethod data obtained from 218 individuals in 46 teams provided support for these hypotheses. Results also suggested that team learning mediated the relationship between power asymmetry and team performance. These findings suggest that power asymmetry can be a resource for and not just an obstacle to team learning in power-asymmetric teams.
In: European journal of work and organizational psychology: the official journal of The European Association of Work and Organizational Psychology, Volume 28, Issue 3, p. 289-299
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (seewww.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is openand never"finished."It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties,such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us. ; publishedVersion
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us. ; peerReviewed
In: Bal , P M , Dóci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Ghoreishi Galugahi , M A , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Röllmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Doci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Galugahi , M A G , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Rollmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see ), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
This manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of Work and Organizational Psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the Future of WOP (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together WOP-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of WOP together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never 'finished.' It should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of WOP could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.
In: Bal , P M , Doci , E , Lub , X , Van Rossenberg , Y G T , Nijs , S , Achnak , S , Briner , R B , Brookes , A , Chudzikowski , K , De Cooman , R , De Gieter , S , De Jong , J , De Jong , S B , Dorenbosch , L , Galugahi , M A G , Hack-Polay , D , Hofmans , J , Hornung , S , Khuda , K , Klamer , R , Mendy , J , Mol , S T , Navarro , J , Notelaers , G , Ossenkop , C , Pickett , J , Rollmann , L , Sanderson , Z , Sosnowska , J , Spanouli , A , Vantilborgh , T , Van Dijk , H & Van Zelst , M 2019 , ' Manifesto for the future of work and organizational psychology ' , European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , vol. 28 , no. 3 , pp. 289-299 . https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1602041
Abstract this manifesto presents 10 recommendations for a sustainable future for the field of work and organizational psychology. The manifesto is the result of an emerging movement around the future of wop (see www.futureofwop.com), which aims to bring together wop-scholars committed to actively contribute to building a better future for our field. Our recommendations are intended to support both individuals and collectives to become actively engaged in co-creating the future of wop together with us. Therefore, this manifesto is open and never "finished." it should continuously evolve, based on an ongoing debate around our professional values and behavior. This manifesto is meant, first of all, for ourselves as an academic community. Furthermore, it is also important for managers, decision makers, and other stakeholders and interested parties, such as students, governments and organizations, as we envision what the future of wop could look like, and it is only through our collective efforts that we will be able to realize a sustainable future for all of us.