How Much Carbon Offsetting and Where? Implications of Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Ethicality Considerations for Public Opinion Formation
In: Energy Policy 94: 387–395
10 results
Sort by:
In: Energy Policy 94: 387–395
SSRN
In: The review of international organizations, Volume 14, Issue 4, p. 661-683
ISSN: 1559-7431
World Affairs Online
In: The review of international organizations, Volume 14, Issue 4, p. 661-683
ISSN: 1559-744X
In: Environmental science & policy, Volume 89, p. 231-246
ISSN: 1462-9011
Recent instances of political backlash against global governance efforts as well as conventional wisdom suggest that there is a link between shifting authority from the domestic to the global level, on the one hand, and the legitimacy of global governance institutions as perceived by citizens and other stakeholders on the other. We thus investigate whether and how increasing the authority of a global governance institution affects citizens' legitimacy perceptions, using a population-based survey experiment in Germany and the United States (N=1600 each). The empirical focus is on climate change, a costly and paradigmatic global governance effort. The results show that certain shifts of political authority, such as changes to majority decision making at the international level and automatic implementation of international decisions domestically, do not significantly affect "average" citizens' legitimacy perceptions of global governance institutions. This result is not due to citizens' incapacity to understand the implications of increasing authority, namely, that increasing authority results in a loss of control over climate policy in Germany and the United States. Rather, legitimacy perceptions appear to be shaped by citizens' perceptions of procedural and performance quality of such efforts as well as by their level of cognitive mobilization, namely their interest in international politics. In brief, we find that citizens relate perceived procedural and performance quality of global governance with their evaluation of its legitimacy, but that subtle shifts of authority from the domestic to the global level do not per se affect citizens' legitimacy perceptions.
BASE
This article studies how public opinion is associated with the introduction of renewable energy policies in Europe. While research increasingly seeks to model the link between public opinion and environmental policies, the empirical evidence is largely based on a single case: the US. This limits the generalizability of findings and we argue accordingly for a systematic, quantitative study of how public opinion drives environmental policies in another context. Theoretically, we combine arguments behind the political survival of democratic leaders with electoral success and environmental politics. Ultimately, we suggest that office-seeking leaders introduce policies that seem favorable to the domestic audience; if the public prefers environmental protection, the government introduces such policies in turn. The main contribution of this research is the cross-country empirical analysis, where we combine data on the public's environmental attitudes and renewable energy policy outputs in a European context between 1974 and 2015. We show that as public opinion shifts towards prioritizing the environment, there is a significant and positive effect on the rate of renewable energy policy outputs by governments in Europe. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic, quantitative study of public opinion and environmental policies across a large set of countries, and we demonstrate that the mechanisms behind the introduction of renewable energy policies follow major trends across European states. ; ISSN:1748-9326 ; ISSN:1748-9318
BASE
SSRN
Working paper
In: Climatic Change. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-017-1959-3
SSRN
In: Data & policy, Volume 6
ISSN: 2632-3249
Abstract
The advent of smart and digital cities is bringing data to the forefront as a critical resource for addressing the multifaceted transitions faced by African cities from rapid urbanization to the climate crisis. However, this commentary highlights the formidable considerations that must be addressed to realize the potential of data-driven urban planning and management. We argue that data should be viewed as a tool, not a panacea, drawing from our experience in modeling and mapping the accessibility of transport systems in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana. We identify five key considerations, including data choice, imperfections, resource intensity, validation, and data market dynamics, and propose three actionable points for progress: local data sharing, centralized repositories, and capacity-building. While our focus is on Kumasi and Accra, the considerations discussed are relevant to cities across the African continent.
In: Territorios: revista de estudios regionales y urbanos, Volume 49, Issue 49-Esp
ISSN: 2215-7484
Las próximas décadas serán de rápida urbanización y estrés climático en las ciudades africanas. Los espacios verdes pueden aumentar la resiliencia de las ciudades frente a las olas de calor, las inundaciones, los deslizamientos de tierra e incluso la erosión costera, además de mejorar la sostenibilidad al reparar la calidad del aire, proteger la biodiversidad y absorber carbono. Sin embargo, datos cuantitativos sobre la forma urbana, la disponibilidad de espacios verdes y la contaminación del aire son muy escasos y de difícil acceso para ciudades en África. En este trabajo usamos datos geoespaciales abiertos para analizar cuantitativamente las relaciones entre la forma urbana, la presencia de espacios verdes y la calidad del aire. Los resultados del análisis indican que la presencia de espacios verdes se relaciona con mejor calidad del aire, pero que deben estar acompañados de otras políticas para que su presencia sea realmente efectiva.