Cover; Author bio; Endorsement; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; List of Figures; Preface; Acknowledgements; Introduction; 1. Revolutionary Regimes and Ideological Factionalism; 2. From Khomeini to Rafsanjani: The Politics of Factionalism from Radical to Moderate Policies; 3. The Reformists and Religious Intellectuals; 4. The Hardline Conservatives: Their Roots and Tenure; 5. The Hardline Conservatives' Ideology; Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; Index
In: Darwich , M , Valbjørn , M , Salloukh , B F , Hazbun , W , Abu Samra , A , Saddiki , S , Saouli , A , Albloshi , H H & Makdisi , K 2021 , ' The Politics of Teaching International Relations in the Arab World : Reading Walt in Beirut, Wendt in Doha, and Abul-Fadl in Cairo ' , International Studies Perspectives , vol. 22 , no. 4 , pp. 407-38 . https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa020
Can International Relations (IR) as it is taught in the Arab world be said to be an "American social science"or is it taught differently in different places? The forum addresses this question through an exploration of what and how scholars at Arab universities are teaching IR and how institutional, historical, and linguistic, as well as political and individual factors shape classroom dynamics in the Arab world. This forum attempts to bring the classroom into the Global/Post-Western debate by showing how IR can be taught differently in different places with a focus on a region under-represented in IR debates: the Arab world. The essays, exhibiting diversity in pedagogical strategies and theoretical perspectives, provide a window into how the "international"is perceived and taught locally by teachers and students in various Arab contexts. While the influence from the American "core"of the discipline is obvious, the forum documents how the theoretical and conceptual foundations of IR based on Western perspectives and history do not travel intact. The essays collectively provide evidence of different kinds of IRs not just across but also within regions and show that studying pedagogy can become a way to study how disciplinary IR varies contextually.
AbstractCan International Relations (IR) as it is taught in the Arab world be said to be an "American social science" or is it taught differently in different places? The forum addresses this question through an exploration of what and how scholars at Arab universities are teaching IR and how institutional, historical, and linguistic, as well as political and individual factors shape classroom dynamics in the Arab world. This forum attempts to bring the classroom into the Global/Post-Western debate by showing how IR can be taught differently in different places with a focus on a region under-represented in IR debates: the Arab world. The essays, exhibiting diversity in pedagogical strategies and theoretical perspectives, provide a window into how the "international" is perceived and taught locally by teachers and students in various Arab contexts. While the influence from the American "core" of the discipline is obvious, the forum documents how the theoretical and conceptual foundations of IR based on Western perspectives and history do not travel intact. The essays collectively provide evidence of different kinds of IRs not just across but also within regions and show that studying pedagogy can become a way to study how disciplinary IR varies contextually.
