Search results

Članek povzema glavne ugotovitve sistematičnega pregleda literature o
seksualnem delu v Sloveniji, objavljene med letoma 1990 in 2020. Glavni namen
je bil zagotoviti sistematičen pregled ugotovitev predhodnih študij o poklicnih
tveganjih v seksualnem delu ter strategijah in politikah za njihovo zmanjševanje.
Rezultati kažejo, da se seksualne_i delavke_ci srečujejo s specifičnimi poklicnimi
tveganji, povezanimi s stigmo, varnostjo, politikami, zdravjem, poslom, dostopom
do storitev in zasebnim življenjem. Za njihovo zmanjševanje uporabljajo številne
strategije, zlasti je pomembno postavljanje mej strankam. Študije za izboljšanje
delovnih razmer priporočajo spremembo regulacije, informiranje različnih ciljnih
skupin ter vzpostavitev dostopnih in nestigmatizirajočih podpornih in zagovorniških programov za seksualne delavke_ce. Naš pregled poleg tega izpostavlja
potrebo po omogočanju in spodbujanju profesionalizacije seksualnega dela.

The spread of hate speech challenges the health of democracy and media systems in contemporary societies. This study aims to contribute to a better understanding of user-generated online hate speech reported by Internet users to national monitoring organizations, in particular its 'ecosystem', discursive elements, and links to political discourses. First, we analyzed the main characteristics of the reported statements (source, removal rate, and targets) to reveal the media and political context of reported user-generated online hate speech. Next, we focused on hate speech statements against migrants and analyzed their discursive elements with the method of critical frame analysis (frames, actors, metaphors, and references) to understand the corresponding discourse. The main discursive feature of these statements is the prognosis, which calls for death and violence, so we could label this communication as 'executive speech.' Other key features are references to weapons and Nazi crimes from WWII, indicating the authors' extreme-right ideological convictions, and the metaphors, employed to provoke disgust from migrants, present them as culturally inferior and raise fears about their supposed violent behavior. The corresponding diagnoses frame migrants as a threat in a similar way to populist political discourses of othering and complement these in providing 'final' solutions in prognoses.

Abstract
Studies have highlighted differences between right-wing populism in Western and Central Eastern Europe but
suggested that discourses have been converging since the so-called "refugee crisis" in 2015. This article examines this claim by
focusing on right-wing populist frames and affective communication on migration in Austria and Slovenia. Taking a
communication-centred approach, the study is based on a critical frame analysis of 70 speeches from far-right to centre-right
parties in parliamentary debates on migration between 2015 and 2019. The results show that right-wing populist discourses in the
two adjacent countries have aligned in appealing to affects, particularly to fear and in framing migration as a threat to security
and culture. Despite differences in mobilizing affects, the findings indicate a mutual alignment of right-wing populism beyond
borders, signalling a potential risk of a broader right-wing populist bloc unified by fear of migration.