The Cook Islands consists of 15 small islands scattered over 1.8 million square kilometers in the South Pacific. The country's economy is small, narrowly based, and vulnerable to external shocks. Tourism accounts for around 60% of gross domestic product, followed by offshore banking, fishing, and agriculture. The Cook Islands is a self-governing country in free association with New Zealand. Its nationals are New Zealand citizens. They have open access to work and reside in New Zealand and—under various reciprocal entry agreements—in Australia. Emigration from the Cook Islands has contributed to a declining population and a shortage of skilled workers.
With its rapid economic growth, China has become the second largest economy. At the same time, a rapid increase in its defense expenditure and expanding maritime ambitions have raised concerns among other Asian nations. Moreover, by displaying its economic and military might China's recent assertive actions in the East China Sea and South China Sea seem to "prove" longstanding worries regarding China's threats. This article reviews the traditional Chinese philosophy of the great state and argues that China unfortunately deviates from it. Cross-national survey data show that Asian citizens widely acknowledge the rising power of China. Nevertheless, an expansion of economic and military power fails to yield more positive evaluations. The country's pursuit of power and blunt foreign policy push neighboring states to welcome an expansion of Japan's military role and to intensify their security ties with the United States to achieve a balance of power. There needs to be a shift in China's foreign policy to earn trust and respect from its Asian neighbors. Power can create a hegemon but it definitely will not make China a great state. (Issues Stud/GIGA)
Der Beitrag umfasst Rezensionen von 18 aktuellen Buchveröffentlichungen zu dem übergreifenden Thema 'Umwelt und Entwicklung'. Die einzelnen Publikationen beinhalten die Auseinandersetzung mit folgendenden Untersuchungsgegenständen: (1) Ecological Economics, (2) die USA und die globale Umweltkrise, (3) die USA und die Neuordnung der Welt, (4) warum die USA die Welt nicht regieren können, (5) Gerechtigkeit und Nachhaltigkeit, (6) Gerechtigkeit und Ökologie, (7) Suffizienz und Lebensstile, (8) Weltmacht Energie, (9) erneuerbare Energien in Südafrika, (10) Erdlandung, (11) globale Waldpolitik, (12) Eco-Efficiency, (13) Green China, (14) Environmental Management in China, (15) Japans Entwicklungszusammenarbeit, (16) Reforming International Environmental Governance, (17) UNEO - A United Nations Environment Organization sowie (18) die Grenzen des Wachstums - das 30-Jahre Update. (ICG2)
Published Online August 27, 2020 ; Background: Achieving universal health coverage (UHC) involves all people receiving the health services they need, of high quality, without experiencing financial hardship. Making progress towards UHC is a policy priority for both countries and global institutions, as highlighted by the agenda of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and WHO's Thirteenth General Programme of Work (GPW13). Measuring effective coverage at the health-system level is important for understanding whether health services are aligned with countries' health profiles and are of sufficient quality to produce health gains for populations of all ages. Methods: Based on the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2019, we assessed UHC effective coverage for 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019. Drawing from a measurement framework developed through WHO's GPW13 consultation, we mapped 23 effective coverage indicators to a matrix representing health service types (eg, promotion, prevention, and treatment) and five population-age groups spanning from reproductive and newborn to older adults (≥65 years). Effective coverage indicators were based on intervention coverage or outcome-based measures such as mortality-to-incidence ratios to approximate access to quality care; outcome-based measures were transformed to values on a scale of 0–100 based on the 2·5th and 97·5th percentile of location-year values. We constructed the UHC effective coverage index by weighting each effective coverage indicator relative to its associated potential health gains, as measured by disability-adjusted life-years for each location-year and population-age group. For three tests of validity (content, known-groups, and convergent), UHC effective coverage index performance was generally better than that of other UHC service coverage indices from WHO (ie, the current metric for SDG indicator 3.8.1 on UHC service coverage), the World Bank, and GBD 2017. We quantified frontiers of UHC effective coverage performance on the basis of pooled health spending per capita, representing UHC effective coverage index levels achieved in 2019 relative to country-level government health spending, prepaid private expenditures, and development assistance for health. To assess current trajectories towards the GPW13 UHC billion target—1 billion more people benefiting from UHC by 2023—we estimated additional population equivalents with UHC effective coverage from 2018 to 2023. Findings: Globally, performance on the UHC effective coverage index improved from 45·8 (95% uncertainty interval 44·2–47·5) in 1990 to 60·3 (58·7–61·9) in 2019, yet country-level UHC effective coverage in 2019 still spanned from 95 or higher in Japan and Iceland to lower than 25 in Somalia and the Central African Republic. Since 2010, sub-Saharan Africa showed accelerated gains on the UHC effective coverage index (at an average increase of 2·6% [1·9–3·3] per year up to 2019); by contrast, most other GBD super-regions had slowed rates of progress in 2010–2019 relative to 1990–2010. Many countries showed lagging performance on effective coverage indicators for non-communicable diseases relative to those for communicable diseases and maternal and child health, despite non-communicable diseases accounting for a greater proportion of potential health gains in 2019, suggesting that many health systems are not keeping pace with the rising non-communicable disease burden and associated population health needs. In 2019, the UHC effective coverage index was associated with pooled health spending per capita (r=0·79), although countries across the development spectrum had much lower UHC effective coverage than is potentially achievable relative to their health spending. Under maximum efficiency of translating health spending into UHC effective coverage performance, countries would need to reach $1398 pooled health spending per capita (US$ adjusted for purchasing power parity) in order to achieve 80 on the UHC effective coverage index. From 2018 to 2023, an estimated 388·9 million (358·6–421·3) more population equivalents would have UHC effective coverage, falling well short of the GPW13 target of 1 billion more people benefiting from UHC during this time. Current projections point to an estimated 3·1 billion (3·0–3·2) population equivalents still lacking UHC effective coverage in 2023, with nearly a third (968·1 million [903·5–1040·3]) residing in south Asia. Interpretation: The present study demonstrates the utility of measuring effective coverage and its role in supporting improved health outcomes for all people—the ultimate goal of UHC and its achievement. Global ambitions to accelerate progress on UHC service coverage are increasingly unlikely unless concerted action on non-communicable diseases occurs and countries can better translate health spending into improved performance. Focusing on effective coverage and accounting for the world's evolving health needs lays the groundwork for better understanding how close—or how far—all populations are in benefiting from UHC. ; GBD 2019 Universal Health Coverage Collaborators. Rafael Lozano . Peter S Azzopardi . Bernhard T Baune . Dinesh Bhandari . Liliana G Ciobanu . Tiffany K Gill . Ratilal Lalloo . Jean Jacques Noubiap . et al.
In 2013 the Hamburg Working Group for Research on the Causes of War (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Kriegsursachenforschung, AKUF) registered 22 wars and 8 armed conflicts. This is the lowest number of wars in the AKUF data base since 1962. The article provides some data on the distribution of these conflicts by region and war types. Furthermore, each of these conflicts and especially major changes during the year 2013 are described in brief. (S+F/Pll)
Miskimmon, O'Loughlin and Zeng: Introduction -- Part I: Shaping Narratives: Contexts for Alignment -- Alister Miskimmon and Ben O'Loughlin (Queen's University Belfast and Royal Holloway, University of London): The EU's struggle for a strategic narrative on China -- Liu Chunrong, (Fudan University): Framing China-EU Sub-regional Cooperation: The Elusive Pursuit of Normative Resonance? -- Shi Zhiqin and Vasilis Trigkas (Tsinghua University), Reconstructing Geography, Power and Politics in the Belt & Road Initiative -- Zhenyan Xi (Sichuan University) – The Assessment of China's Economic Rise and Its Strategic Narrative in Europe -- Part II: Measuring Narratives: Analytical Tool of Perceptions -- Jinghan Zeng (Royal Holloway): The role of Europe in Chinese strategic narratives: "Belt and Road Initiative" and "New Type of Great Power relations" -- Junchi Ma (Institute for European Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences): The paradoxes between narrator and audience in the China's narrative of Belt and Road Initiative -- Li Zhang (Tsinghua University)- China's Belt and Road Initiative in the European Media: A Mixed Narrative? -- Feng Zhongping and Huang Jing (China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations), Chinese strategic narratives of Europe since the European debt crisis -- Floor Keuleers (Leuven): Choosing the Better Devil: Reception of EU and Chinese Narratives on Development by South African University Students -- Carolijn van Noort (Otago/UWE): Visual Analysis of the Belt and Road Initiative: The Securing of a Regional Geopolitical Order, China's Identity, and Infrastructure Development Narratives -- Miskimmon, O'Loughlin and Zeng: Conclusions.
Access options:
The following links lead to the full text from the respective local libraries:
