Internet Regulation Process Model: The Effect of Societies, Communities, and Governments
In: Political communication, Volume 15, Issue 4, p. 427
ISSN: 1058-4609
6000 results
Sort by:
In: Political communication, Volume 15, Issue 4, p. 427
ISSN: 1058-4609
In: Oxford private international law series
In: Oxford private international law series
In: Oxford legal research library
In: ZEW - Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 17-028
SSRN
Working paper
In: ESMT Working Paper 17-02
SSRN
Working paper
Blog: Cato at Liberty
Hopefully, the net neutrality controversy will be retired—by courts or by Congress—before it does much damage to the Internet services and infrastructure sectors and before it enters a fourth decade.
In: Discussion paper 17-028
In: Competition and regulation
In: Marquette Law Review, Volume 107, p. 145
SSRN
In: Asian journal of communication, Volume 28, Issue 4, p. 434-447
ISSN: 1742-0911
In: Administrative Law Review, Volume 67, Issue 1
SSRN
In: Political communication: an international journal, Volume 15, Issue 4, p. 427-444
ISSN: 1091-7675
In: RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTERNET GOVERNANCE, Ian Brown, ed., Edward Elgar, 2012
SSRN
In: Presentation at the Conference on Freedom of Expression, 8-9 May 2014 University of Helsinki
SSRN
Working paper
In: Regulation & governance, Volume 4, Issue 3
ISSN: 1748-5991
The ultimate formulation of the Federal Communications Commission's 'nondiscrimination on the Internet' principle could have a significant impact on economic welfare and on innovation. In this article, we explain the economics of discrimination as it applies to the Internet, and we offer a new approach for identifying anticompetitive discrimination. Our proposal would require a complaining content provider to prove (i) the broadband service provider has discriminated in favor of some affiliated content provider that is 'similarly situated' to the independent content provider; (ii) such disparate treatment is based on affiliation and not on some other consideration; (iii) the independent content provider has been unreasonably restrained in its ability to compete; and (iv) the harm it suffers as a result of the discrimination would likely redound to the harm of broadband users. Adapted from the source document.
In: Political communication, Volume 15, Issue 4, p. 427-444
ISSN: 1058-4609