Ground Zero: reflections on trauma, in/distinction and response
In: Journal for cultural research, Volume 8, Issue 3, p. 247-270
ISSN: 1740-1666
70 results
Sort by:
In: Journal for cultural research, Volume 8, Issue 3, p. 247-270
ISSN: 1740-1666
In: Perspectives on politics: a political science public sphere, Volume 2, Issue 3
ISSN: 1537-5927
In: Contemporary politics, Volume 9, Issue 4, p. 361-370
ISSN: 1469-3631
In: Journal of human rights, Volume 2, Issue 2, p. 253-258
ISSN: 1475-4843
In: Journal of political & military sociology, Volume 31, Issue 2, p. 231-252
ISSN: 0047-2697
In: IDS bulletin: transforming development knowledge, Volume 33, Issue 4, p. 12-18
ISSN: 1759-5436
In: International relations: the journal of the David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies, Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 243-256
ISSN: 1741-2862
Traumatic events demand a response that recognizes their impact rather than one that moves rapidly to forgetting the trauma or incorporating it into existing narratives. This article explores four reactions to the events of September 11: securitization, criminalization, aestheticization and politicization. Securitization represents the rapid reinstatement of state power and sovereign control in the face of a traumatic challenge to the state's monopolization of the instrumentalization of human life. While criminalization is less dangerous, it nevertheless involves the depoliticization of opposition and risks outlawing citizen dissent. Aestheticization can be a party to the rebuilding of narratives of nation and heroism in support of state action, but it can also provide a site for critical engagement with the reality of trauma and an acknowledgement of the impossibility of its domestication. Politicization demands a refusal of the easy categories and accepted agendas of what we call `politics' and calls for an engagement with the complexity of the events themselves in all their specificity.
In: IDS bulletin, Volume 33, Issue 4, p. 12-18
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872
In: International relations: the journal of the David Davies Memorial Institute of International Studies, Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 243-256
ISSN: 0047-1178
Traumatic events demand a response that recognizes their impact rather than one that moves rapidly to forgetting the trauma or incorporating it into existing narratives. This article explores four reactions to the events of September 11: securitization, criminalization, aestheticization & politicization. Securitization represents the rapid reinstatement of state power & sovereign control in the face of a traumatic challenge to the state's monopolization of the instrumentalization of human life. While criminalization is less dangerous, it nevertheless involves the depoliticization of opposition & risks outlawing citizen dissent. Aestheticization can be a party to the rebuilding of narratives of nation & heroism in support of state action, but it can also provide a site for critical engagement with the reality of trauma & an acknowledgement of the impossibility of its domestication. Politicization demands a refusal of the easy categories & accepted agendas of what we call 'politics' & calls for an engagement with the complexity of the events themselves in all their specificity. [Copyright 2002 Sage Publications Ltd.]
In: Cultural Values, Volume 5, Issue 4, p. 405-420
ISSN: 1467-8713
In: Alternatives: global, local, political, Volume 25, Issue 1, p. 3-26
ISSN: 0304-3754
In: Alternatives: global, local, political, Volume 25, Issue 1, p. 3-25
ISSN: 2163-3150
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 25, Issue 3, p. 547-575
ISSN: 1477-9021
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 25, Issue 3, p. 547-576
ISSN: 0305-8298
In: Millennium: journal of international studies, Volume 24, Issue 1, p. 184-185
ISSN: 1477-9021