Search results

This article examines cross-national variation in the diffusion and adoption of military technologies and ideas. The history of warfare has been marked by periods of innovation in which the institutions and practices of war-making adapted in response to technological opportunities, and social and political developments. As information about new practices spreads, through the demonstration effects of innovating states or transnational social networks, military innovations have diffused throughout the international system. Diffusion can restructure power relations as states leverage new capabilities to increase their military power and enhance their international influence.

Within theframework of the European Security Strategy, approved by the European Council in December 2003, it is assumed that European forces would contribute to global security and would engage in tasks that are different from classic war fighting or traditional peacekeeping. These operations can be described as law enforcement or human security operations even though they are more robust than policing and may involve the use of military force. Prerequisities for these operations include: the primacy of human rights; legality; appropriate military response; clear political authority; civil, police and military coordination; and adequate intelligence and information. The coordination of these elements will require a change in military culture and in civil-military relations as well as considerable political will. (Survival / SWP)

During war activities, the evaluation of invisible areas and military armors in mountainous terrain is very important for assessment of operational-tactical situation in battlefield. This information can be used for prevention of an enemy sudden attack. In given paper, the quantitative method of the assessment of invisible areas and military objects in mountainous terrain is developed and offered by using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The probabilities of detection of invisible area or enemy object by using 1 and n UAVs are calculated. Previously obtained data by ArcGIS software (GIS technology) have been used for calculations and evaluations the number of invisible areas and military objects. The analysis of the dependence of effectiveness of revealing and localization areas and military objects on UAV number has been carried out. It was established that for quantitative analysis of invisible areas it is more efficiently to use one UAV, but for detection of armored vehicles and military objects it is more efficiently to use several UAV. Our experiments in mountainous conditions had shown that at flight height 300 m and battle-front 2,5 km putting 3-5 UAVs is real. In this case, all of them perform operational mission and return to base.

During war activities, the evaluation of invisible areas and military armors in mountainous terrain is very important for assessment of operational-tactical situation in battlefield. This information can be used for prevention of an enemy sudden attack. In given paper, the quantitative method of the assessment of invisible areas and military objects in mountainous terrain is developed and offered by using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. The probabilities of detection of invisible area or enemy object by using 1 and n UAVs are calculated. Previously obtained data by ArcGIS software (GIS technology) have been used for calculations and evaluations the number of invisible areas and military objects. The analysis of the dependence of effectiveness of revealing and localization areas and military objects on UAV number has been carried out. It was established that for quantitative analysis of invisible areas it is more efficiently to use one UAV, but for detection of armored vehicles and military objects it is more efficiently to use several UAV. Our experiments in mountainous conditions had shown that at flight height 300 m and battle-front 2,5 km putting 3-5 UAVs is real. In this case, all of them perform operational mission and return to base.

Varied programmes of research are now commonplace in, or in connection with, the military establishments of most of the larger countries of the world. In the United States, and to some extent in Canada, this is true also of the social sciences. The institutional setting of research is of peculiar interest to sociologists, particularly since rapid and extensive changes have recently been characteristic of military organizations. The main concern of this paper is, therefore, to describe and interpret some of the processes of change observed in the course of the work of the Defence Scientific Service with the Canadian Army during the past five years. A brief introduction notes the recent growth of the Army, the involvement in military affairs of large numbers of scientists, including some social scientists, and suggests the importance of the military as an area for the sociological study of work.