Article(electronic)2010

Security threats, linguistic homogeneity, and the necessary conditions for political unification

In: Nations and nationalism: journal of the Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism, Volume 16, Issue 1, p. 169-188

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

The proposition that security threats can drive states to pool their sovereignty has been around for some time. The existence of these threats, according to William Riker, is a necessary condition for political unification. A less common argument centers on linguistic homogeneity; it asserts that states must be sufficiently similar and speak the same language before they can successfully imagine a common state. This paper tests both hypotheses in a large-N analysis that identifies all instances of voluntary political unification between 1816 and 2001. It takes the form of a falsification probe and examines whether any unification happened in the absence of either an external security threat or a common language. It finds that political unification has occurred in relatively tranquil settings, but that all unifying dyads have shared a common language. Security threats are not a necessary condition, but a common language may well be. Adapted from the source document.

Languages

English

Publisher

Blackwell Publishing, Oxford UK

ISSN: 1469-8129

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-8129.2010.00429.x

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.