Article(electronic)2010

Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Best Practices in the Development of Historically Oriented Replication Databases

In: Annual review of political science, Volume 13, p. 37-59

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

The proliferation of historically oriented replication data has provided great opportunities for political scientists to develop and to test theories relevant to a range of macrohistorical phenomena. But what is the quality of such data? Are the codings or quantitative mappings of historical events, processes, and unit characteristics based on sufficiently solid foundations equivalent to those found in detailed case studies? This article evaluates a set of the most transparently disseminated replication datasets across a variety of research domains from the perspective of best-practice qualitative-historical research. It identifies a wide range of practices, highlighting both fundamental and innovative standards that might be adopted in future research. Adapted from the source document.

Languages

English

Publisher

Annual Reviews, Palo Alto CA

ISSN: 1545-1577

DOI

10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.041007.155222

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.