Bridging the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide: Best Practices in the Development of Historically Oriented Replication Databases
In: Annual review of political science, Volume 13, p. 37-59
Abstract
The proliferation of historically oriented replication data has provided great opportunities for political scientists to develop and to test theories relevant to a range of macrohistorical phenomena. But what is the quality of such data? Are the codings or quantitative mappings of historical events, processes, and unit characteristics based on sufficiently solid foundations equivalent to those found in detailed case studies? This article evaluates a set of the most transparently disseminated replication datasets across a variety of research domains from the perspective of best-practice qualitative-historical research. It identifies a wide range of practices, highlighting both fundamental and innovative standards that might be adopted in future research. Adapted from the source document.
Citations
We have found one citation for you at OpenAlex.
We have found citations for you at OpenAlex.
References
We have found one reference for you at OpenAlex.
We have found references for you at OpenAlex.
Subjects
Languages
English
Publisher
Annual Reviews, Palo Alto CA
ISSN: 1545-1577
DOI
Report Issue