Article(electronic)December 8, 2009

Rejoinder to Machaj on Indifference

In: New perspectives on political economy: NPPE ; a bilingual interdisciplinary journal, Volume 5, Issue 1, p. 65-71

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

Nozick (1977) was a methodological critique of the Austrian School of economics. He took the view that the praxeological school was guilty of a logical contradiction. On the one hand, it eschews the concept of indifference. On the other, it utilizes that of supply. But, Nozick argued, for there to be any supply of a good, people must be indifferent to constituent elements of it. Block (1980) attempted to answer Nozick's criticism, making the point that "supply" is a coherent concept, and people are indeed indifferent to units of which it is comprised, but before human action. During human action, there cannot be any such thing as indifference, in the technical sense. Machaj (2007) criticizes both Nozick (1997) and Block (1980). The present paper is a response to Machaj (2007).

Languages

English

Publisher

Cevro Institut

ISSN: 1801-0938

DOI

10.62374/bnejq268

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.