Article(electronic)January 1, 2017

The Private Law Effect of MiFID: the Genil Case and Beyond

In: European review of contract law: ERCL, Volume 13, Issue 1

Busch, Danny

Order using Subito

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

AbstractThis article examines to what extent the civil courts are bound by MiFID I/MiFID II under EU law. The following questions are considered in this context: (1) May civil courts be less strict than MiFID I/MiFID II? (2) May civil courts be stricter than MiFID I/MiFID II? (3) May contracting parties be less strict than MiFID I/MiFID II? (4) May contracting parties be stricter than MiFID I/MiFID II? (5) What effect does MiFID I/MiFID II have on the requirement of proximity or relativity in the Member States where this is a requirement for liability in tort? (6) What effect does MiFID I/MiFID II have on the proof of causal link? (7) What is the influence of MiFID I/MiFID II on a contractual limitation or exclusion of liability? (8) Should civil courts apply MiFID I/MiFID II of their own motion?

Publisher

Walter de Gruyter GmbH

ISSN: 1614-9939

DOI

10.1515/ercl-2017-0003

ExportReport Issue

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.