On the Relationship between Public Opinion and Decision Making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals

In: Political research quarterly: PRQ ; official journal of the Western Political Science Association and other associations, Volume 64, Issue 4, p. 736-748

Abstract

The authors explore whether the federal courts act as countermajoritarian institutions by investigating the influence of public mood on decision making in the U.S. Courts of Appeals from 1961 to 2002. The results indicate that public opinion affects courts of appeals decision making indirectly through judicial replacements and institutional constrains from Congress, but the authors fail to uncover evidence that courts of appeals judges respond directly to changes in public opinion. They conclude that, absent membership turnover in the circuit or in Congress, the courts of appeals are not responsive to the will of the public.