Article(electronic)November 14, 2011

Federalist No. 71: Does Duration in Office Provide Vigilant Autonomy in the Regulatory Process?

In: Public administration review: PAR, Volume 71, Issue s1

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

Federalist No. 71 contains a strong defense of duration in office as a source of "cool and sedate reflection" by the executive. According to Alexander Hamilton's argument, duration in office is essential for the vigilant autonomy needed to faithfully execute the laws. The author examines this argument within the context of government regulation, using the recent financial crisis and consumer safety as examples of the limits of stability and autonomy for creating vigilant autonomy.When occasions present themselves, in which the interests of the people are at variance with their inclinations, it is the duty of the persons whom they have appointed to be the guardians of those interests, to withstand the temporary delusion, in order to give them time and opportunity for more cool and sedate reflection.—Federalist No. 71

Languages

English

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN: 1540-6210

DOI

10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02473.x

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.