Article(electronic)April 2005

In Response to Saltman

In: PS: political science & politics, Volume 38, Issue 2, p. 188-188

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

Saltman's comment (PS, July 2004, 383) simply ignores the bulk of my previous letter (PS, January 2004, 1–2) which dealt with Alabama. I gather that there he agrees with Russell and myself. Thus, there is no dispute on the question of whether Nixon or Kennedy had more popular votes in 1960. His criticism concerns my feeling, originally suggested by Russell, that with more political honesty on the part of the Chicago and Texas machines, Nixon might have taken the Electoral College, too. He doesn't specifically dispute my statement that the difference in Illinois was "smaller than the usual number of votes produced by the Chicago machine from graveyards and empty lots."

Languages

English

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

DOI

10.1017/s1049096505056271

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.