Article(electronic)September 1997

Separation or Unity? A Model for Solving Ethnic Conflicts

In: Politics and the life sciences: PLS ; a journal of political behavior, ethics, and policy, Volume 16, Issue 2, p. 237-248

Checking availability at your location

Abstract

This article outlines a consistent and rational model for solving ethnic conflicts. We argue that ethnic separation should be regarded as an alternative to national unity, and not simply dismissed as impossible. A decision on separation or unity should be made democratically by the group whose separation has been proposed. If separation is approved, migration over the border between the newly formed states should be part of such a solution. The article has three main parts: (1) a model for solving separationist demands; (2) an analysis of the evolutionary background to ethnic conflicts; and (3) a discussion of principal objections to the proposed model. The present international impotence in situations of ethnic conflict is to a high degree caused by seeing most solutions as impossible—either realistically or morally. This article stresses the virtue of having one model instead of the "flexibility" that currently prevails under the disguise of generally acclaimed, but contradictory ideals.

Languages

English

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

ISSN: 1471-5457

DOI

10.1017/s0730938400024710

Report Issue

If you have problems with the access to a found title, you can use this form to contact us. You can also use this form to write to us if you have noticed any errors in the title display.