Dragon year superstition, birth timing, and neonatal health outcomes
In: China economic review, Band 66, S. 101594
ISSN: 1043-951X
445964 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: China economic review, Band 66, S. 101594
ISSN: 1043-951X
In: Pediatrics 115.2005,2,2
In: Supplement
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 12796
SSRN
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 13046
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of the Nepal Health Research Council, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 141-145
ISSN: 1999-6217
Background: Neonatal mortality rate of developing countries is declining over decades. In the recent years increasing number of preterm and high risk neonates have facilities for tertiary care treatment. The aim of the study was to assess the morbidities and outcome of neonatal intensive care admissions.Methods: It was a retrospective observational study carried out in neonatal intensive care unit of the Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal from January 2014 to December 2015. Neonatal details including place of delivery, birth weight, gestation, diagnosis at admission, hospital course and final outcome were recorded in predesigned proforma. Risk of mortality was calculated using odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Results: There were total 1708 admission during study period and inborn as well as out born neonates were equally admitted. Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (37.1%), neonatal sepsis 532 (31.2%), prematurity, 314 (18.4%) perinatal asphyxia 112 (6.6%), meconium aspiration syndrome 79 (4.6%) and intrauterine growth restriction 49 (2.8%) were main indications for hospitalization. A total of 1410 (82.6%) the patients were discharged after treatment, 167 (9.7) left against medical advice, 115 (6.7%) died in hospital and 16 (1%) cases were referred. Preterm neonates had twice the risk of mortality than term neonates (OR =2.1664). Birth weight < 2500 grams had three times more risk of neonatal mortality than normal birth weight (OR =3.0783).Conclusions: Neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, prematurity and neonatal sepsis were common morbidities inneonatal intensive care unit.
In: Medical care research and review, Band 76, Heft 5, S. 627-642
ISSN: 1552-6801
In 2012, Oregon's Medicaid program implemented a comprehensive accountable care model delivered through coordinated care organizations (CCOs). Because CCOs are expected to improve utilization of services and health outcomes, neonatal and infant outcomes may be important indicators of their impact. Estimating difference-in-differences models, we compared prepost CCO changes in outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, abnormal conditions, 5-minute Apgar score, congenital anomalies, and infant mortality) between Medicaid and non-Medicaid births among 99,924 infants born in Oregon during 2011 and 2013. We further examined differences in the impact of CCOs by ethnicity and rurality. Following CCO implementation the likelihood of low birth weight and abnormal conditions decreased by 0.95% and 1.08%, a reduction of 13.4% and 10.4% compared with the pre-CCO level for Medicaid enrollees, respectively. These reductions could be predictive of lifelong health benefits for infants and lower costs for acute care and are, therefore, important markers of success for the CCO model.
In: Conflict and health, Band 9, Heft 1
ISSN: 1752-1505
In: Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation: official publication of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, Band 3, Heft 2, S. 249A
ISSN: 1556-7117
In: American economic review, Band 106, Heft 5, S. 329-332
ISSN: 1944-7981
We take advantage of a new natural experiment to evaluate the health effects of scheduling birth early for non-medical reasons on infant health. In 2010, the cancellation of a generous child benefit in Spain led may families to schedule birth early in order to remain eligible for the subsidy. We document that the affected cohort of children did not suffer any increase in birth complications or medical conditions right at birth, but were significantly more likely to be admitted to hospital during their second and third weeks of life, suggesting potentially persistent negative health effects.
In: IZA Discussion Paper No. 13099
SSRN
Working paper
In: Haider, M. and A. Mukherjee (2010), "Analysis of Neonatal Health in South Asia," International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, Vol. 4, No.1, pp. 40-59
SSRN
Background: From 2013 a midwife-led continuity model of care was implemented in the Nablus region in occupied Palestine, involving a governmental hospital and ten rural villages. This study analysed the relation between the midwife-led model and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Method: A register-based, retrospective cohort design was used, involving 2201 singleton births between January 2016 and June 2017 at Nablus governmental hospital. Data from rural women, with singleton pregnancies and mixed risk status, who either lived in villages that offered the midwife-led continuity model and had registered at the governmental clinic, or who lived in villages without the midwife-led model and received regular care, were compared. Primary outcome was unplanned caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were other modes of birth, postpartum anaemia, preterm birth, birth weight, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Findings: Statistically significant less women receiving the midwife-led model had unplanned caesarean sections, 12·8% vs 15·9%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0·80 (95% CI 0·64–0·99) and postpartum anaemia,19·8% vs 28·6%, aRR 0·72 (0·60–0·85). There was also a statistically significant lower rate of preterm births within the exposed group, 13·1% vs 16·8, aRR 0·79 (0·63–0·98), admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 7·0% vs 9·9%, aRR 0·71 (0·52–0·98) and newborn with birth weight 1500 g and less, 0·1% vs 1·1%, aRR 0·13 (0·02–0·97). Interpretation: Receiving the midwife-led continuity model of care in Palestine was associated with several improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The findings support further implementation of the model. Implementation research, including randomised studies, would be useful to further investigate the effect and feasibility of the model in a low resource setting. ; This study was partly funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC), project number 243706. The implementation received public funding through Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC). ; publishedVersion
BASE
In: Twin research and human genetics: the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies (ISTS) and the Human Genetics Society of Australasia, Band 14, Heft 2, S. 201-212
ISSN: 1839-2628
This study was conducted for the purpose of assessing, in the light of results of other research carried out in the present researchers' clinic and in Turkey, the status of twin pregnancies in Turkey, the incidence of twin births, perinatal and mortality rates associated with twin pregnancies, and the problems experienced in Turkey in cases of multiple and twin pregnancies.Materials and Methodology:The outcomes of twin births that occurred at the researchers' clinic during the period 2001–2009 were studied retrospectively. Seventeen studies conducted in Turkey on multiple and twin pregnancies during the years 1991–2010 were included in the study.Findings:It was observed that the mean multiple pregnancy rate in Turkey is 1.9% and the mean twin birth rate is 1.7%. It was also observed that a large majority (80–97.3%) of multiple pregnancies in Turkey are twin pregnancies. It was noted from Turkish literature that the mean gestational age of twins at birth varies between 33–36.2 weeks and that mean birthweights are 2065–2327 grams for the first-born twin and 1887–2262 grams for the second-born. These findings were observed to be lower than what is indicated in the literature. Perinatal and neonatal mortality, at 58–156/1000 and 40–98/1000 respectively, were seen to be higher than in the literature.Conclusion:It can be seen that preterm birth rates for twin pregnancies in Turkey are higher than what is indicated in the literature and that prenatal and neonatal mortality rates are also similarly higher.
BACKGROUND: From 2013 a midwife-led continuity model of care was implemented in the Nablus region in occupied Palestine, involving a governmental hospital and ten rural villages. This study analysed the relation between the midwife-led model and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. METHOD: A register-based, retrospective cohort design was used, involving 2201 singleton births between January 2016 and June 2017 at Nablus governmental hospital. Data from rural women, with singleton pregnancies and mixed risk status, who either lived in villages that offered the midwife-led continuity model and had registered at the governmental clinic, or who lived in villages without the midwife-led model and received regular care, were compared. Primary outcome was unplanned caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were other modes of birth, postpartum anaemia, preterm birth, birth weight, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. FINDINGS: Statistically significant less women receiving the midwife-led model had unplanned caesarean sections, 12·8% vs 15·9%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0·80 (95% CI 0·64–0·99) and postpartum anaemia,19·8% vs 28·6%, aRR 0·72 (0·60–0·85). There was also a statistically significant lower rate of preterm births within the exposed group, 13·1% vs 16·8, aRR 0·79 (0·63–0·98), admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 7·0% vs 9·9%, aRR 0·71 (0·52–0·98) and newborn with birth weight 1500 g and less, 0·1% vs 1·1%, aRR 0·13 (0·02–0·97). INTERPRETATION: Receiving the midwife-led continuity model of care in Palestine was associated with several improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The findings support further implementation of the model. Implementation research, including randomised studies, would be useful to further investigate the effect and feasibility of the model in a low resource setting. FUNDING: This study was partly funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC), project number 243706. The implementation received public funding ...
BASE
Background From 2013 a midwife-led continuity model of care was implemented in the Nablus region in occupied Palestine, involving a governmental hospital and ten rural villages. This study analysed the relation between the midwife-led model and maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Method A register-based, retrospective cohort design was used, involving 2201 singleton births between January 2016 and June 2017 at Nablus governmental hospital. Data from rural women, with singleton pregnancies and mixed risk status, who either lived in villages that offered the midwife-led continuity model and had registered at the governmental clinic, or who lived in villages without the midwife-led model and received regular care, were compared. Primary outcome was unplanned caesarean section. Secondary outcomes were other modes of birth, postpartum anaemia, preterm birth, birth weight, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Findings Statistically significant less women receiving the midwife-led model had unplanned caesarean sections, 12·8% vs 15·9%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0·80 (95% CI 0·64–0·99) and postpartum anaemia,19·8% vs 28·6%, aRR 0·72 (0·60–0·85). There was also a statistically significant lower rate of preterm births within the exposed group, 13·1% vs 16·8, aRR 0·79 (0·63–0·98), admission to neonatal intensive care unit, 7·0% vs 9·9%, aRR 0·71 (0·52–0·98) and newborn with birth weight 1500 g and less, 0·1% vs 1·1%, aRR 0·13 (0·02–0·97). Interpretation Receiving the midwife-led continuity model of care in Palestine was associated with several improved maternal and neonatal health outcomes. The findings support further implementation of the model. Implementation research, including randomised studies, would be useful to further investigate the effect and feasibility of the model in a low resource setting. Funding This study was partly funded by the Research Council of Norway through the Global Health and Vaccination Program (GLOBVAC), project number 243706. The implementation received public funding through Norwegian Aid Committee (NORWAC).
BASE