What are the major global threats and impacts in marine environments? Investigating the contours of a shared perception among marine scientists from the bottom-up
In: Marine policy, Band 60, S. 197-201
ISSN: 0308-597X
5 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Marine policy, Band 60, S. 197-201
ISSN: 0308-597X
In: Marine policy: the international journal of ocean affairs, Band 60, S. 197-201
ISSN: 0308-597X
As the world's social-environmental problems increasingly extend across boundaries, both disciplinary and political, there is a growing need for interdisciplinarity, not only in research per se, but also in doctoral education. We present the common pitfalls of interdisciplinary research in doctoral education, illustrating approaches towards solutions using the Nordic Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources under Climate Change (NorMER) research network as a case study. We provide insights and detailed examples of how to overcome some of the challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research within doctoral studies that can be applied within any doctoral/postdoctoral education programme, and beyond. Results from a self-evaluation survey indicate that early-career workshops, annual meetings and research visits to other institutions were the most effective learning mechanisms, whereas single discipline-focused courses and coursework were among the least effective learning mechanisms. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of components of NorMER, this case study can inform the design of future programmes to enhance interdisciplinarity in doctoral education, as well as be applied to science collaboration and academic research in general. ; This study is a product of the Nordic Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources under Climate Change (NorMER, Project no. 36800), which is funded by the Norden Top-level Research Initiative sub-programme 'Effect Studies and Adaptation to Climate Change'. We thank Nils Chr. Stenseth for support during the preparation of this manuscript, as well as 3 anonymous reviewers for useful and constructive comments. ; Peer Reviewed
BASE
ABSTRACT. In the last two decades the use of species distribution modeling (SDM) for the study and management of marine species has increased dramatically. The availability of predictor variables on a global scale and the ease of use of SDM techniques have resulted in a proliferation of research on the topic of species distribution in the deep sea. Translation of research projects into management tools that can be used to make decisions in the face of changing climate and increasing exploitation of deep-sea resources has been less rapid but necessary. The goal of this workshop was to discuss methods and variables for modeling species distributions in deep-sea habitats and produce standards that can be used to judge SDMs that may be useful to meet management and conservation goals. During the workshop, approaches to modeling and environmental data were discussed and guidelines developed including the desire that 1) environmental variables should be chosen for ecological significance a priori; 2) the scale and accuracy of environmental data should be considered in choosing a modeling method; 3) when possible proxy variables such as depth should be avoided if causal variables are available; 4) models with statistically robust and rigorous outputs are preferred, but not always possible; and 5) model validation is important. Although general guidelines for SDMs were developed, in most cases management issues and objectives should be considered when designing a modeling project. In particular, the trade-off between model complexity and researcher's ability to communicate input data, modeling method, results and uncertainty is an important consideration for the target audience. RÉSUMÉ. Au cours des deux dernières décennies, le recours à la modélisation de la répartition des espèces pour étudier et gérer les espèces marines a considérablement augmenté. La disponibilité des variables prédictives à l'échelle mondiale et la convivialité de ces techniques de modélisation ont entraîné la multiplication des recherches sur la ...
BASE
In: Holt , R E , Woods , P J , Ferreira , A S , Bardarson , H , Bonanomi , S , Boonstra , W J , Butler , W E , Diekert , F K , Fouzai , N , Holma , M , Kokkalis , A , Kvile , K Ø , Macdonald , J I , Malanski , E , Nieminen , E , Ottosen , K M , Pedersen , M W , Richter , A , Rogers , L , Romagnoni , G , Snickars , M , Törnroos , A , Weigel , B , Whittington , J D & Yletyinen , J 2017 , ' Avoiding pitfalls in interdisciplinary education ' , Climate Research , vol. 74 , no. 2 , pp. 121-129 . https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01491
As the world's social-environmental problems increasingly extend across boundaries, both disciplinary and political, there is a growing need for interdisciplinarity, not only in research per se, but also in doctoral education. We present the common pitfalls of interdisciplinary research in doctoral education, illustrating approaches towards solutions using the Nordic Centre for Research on Marine Ecosystems and Resources under Climate Change (NorMER) research network as a case study. We provide insights and detailed examples of how to overcome some of the challenges of conducting interdisciplinary research within doctoral studies that can be applied within any doctoral/postdoctoral education programme, and beyond. Results from a selfevaluation survey indicate that early-career workshops, annual meetings and research visits to other institutions were the most effective learning mechanisms, whereas single discipline-focused courses and coursework were among the least effective learning mechanisms. By identifying the strengths and weaknesses of components of NorMER, this case study can inform the design of future programmes to enhance interdisciplinarity in doctoral education, as well as be applied to science collaboration and academic research in general
BASE