A Comparative Study of Cryptocurrency Market of India with the Global Market
In: International Blockchain And Cryptocurrency Conference November 2-3, 2021, Ankara, Turkey ISBN: 978-1-955094-18-4
6 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: International Blockchain And Cryptocurrency Conference November 2-3, 2021, Ankara, Turkey ISBN: 978-1-955094-18-4
SSRN
SSRN
BACKGROUND: In India, the distribution and retention of biomedical doctors in public sector facilities in rural areas is an obstacle to improving access to health services. The Government of Uttar Pradesh is developing a comprehensive, ten-year Human Resources for Health (HRH) strategy, which includes policies to address rural distribution and retention of government doctors in Uttar Pradesh (UP). We undertook a stakeholder analysis to understand stakeholder positions on particular policies within the strategy, and to examine how stakeholder power and interests would shape the development and implementation of these proposed policies. This paper focuses on the results of the stakeholder analysis pertaining to rural distribution and retention of doctors in the government sector in UP. Our objectives are to 1) analyze stakeholder power in influencing the adoption of policies; 2) compare and analyze stakeholder positions on specific policies, including their perspectives on the conditions for successful policy adoption and implementation; and 3) explore the challenges with developing and implementing a coordinated, 'bundled' approach to strengthening rural distribution and retention of doctors. METHODS: We utilized three forms of data collection for this study – document review, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions. We conducted 17 interviews and three focus group discussions with key stakeholders between September and November 2019. RESULTS: We found that the adoption of a coordinated policy approach for rural retention and distribution of doctors is negatively impacted by governance challenges and fragmentation within and beyond the health sector. Respondents also noted that the opposition to certain policies by health worker associations created challenges for comprehensive policy development. Finally, respondents believed that even in the event of policy adoption, implementation remained severely hampered by several factors, including weak mechanisms of accountability and perceived corruption at ...
BASE
OBJECTIVES: Despite being implemented for decades, Nepal's Integrated Management of Acute Malnutrition program has experienced several implementation challenges such as low coverage, stock outs of ready-to-use therapeutic food supplies, poor reporting, loss to follow up and sub-optimal counselling. To address these and build a culture of continuous service delivery improvement, the Suaahara-II program adopted and assessed a quality improvement (QI) approach. METHODS: Change ideas, including increasing case identification through various platforms, developing QA standards to measure service quality, and providing incentives for female community health volunteers, were implemented as part of the QI initiative in four pilot municipalities. To assess changes in outcomes such as cure rate and number of cases identified and lost to follow-up, baseline information was collected over six months pre-implementation and performance was monitored throughout the QI implementation cycle of 17 months (February 2019—June 2021). We also analyzed secondary data from the government health management information system and established a monitoring mechanism to ensure data quality for outcome measures. For the outcome measure of service quality score, we developed a quality assurance (QA) checklist to score services while treating children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM). RESULTS: Our findings suggest that the QI effort was effective. The SAM cure rate increased from 67.4% pre-implementation to 80% post-implementation and the loss-to-follow-up rate declined from 26% to 8%. The number of new SAM cases fluctuated between 0–20 cases per month likely due to restrictions to mobility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Although there is no comparison to facilities that did not participate in the QI pilot, those that did had an average quality assurance score of 82.4%–above the 80% benchmark. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the QI approach helped improve SAM cure rate, limited loss-to-follow-up and improved quality of case management for ...
BASE
BACKGROUND: Ensuring the current public health workforce has appropriate competencies to fulfill essential public health functions is challenging in many low- and middle-income countries. The absence of an agreed set of core competencies to provide a basis for developing and assessing knowledge, skills, abilities, and attitudes contributes to this challenge. This study aims to identify the requisite core competencies for practicing health professionals in mid-level supervisory and program management roles to effectively perform their public health responsibilities in the resource-poor setting of Uttar Pradesh (UP), India. METHODS: We used a multi-step, interactive Delphi technique to develop an agreed set of public health competencies. A narrative review of core competency frameworks and key informant interviews with human resources for health experts in India were conducted to prepare an initial list of 40 competency statements in eight domains. We then organized a day-long workshop with 22 Indian public health experts and government officials, who added to and modified the initial list. A revised list of 54 competency statements was rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Aggregate statement scores were shared with the participants, who discussed the findings. Finally, the revised list was returned to participants for an additional round of ratings. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to identify stability between steps, and consensus was defined using the percent agreement criterion. RESULTS: Stability between the first and second Delphi scoring steps was reached in 46 of the 54 statements. By the end of the second Delphi scoring step, consensus was reached on 48 competency statements across eight domains: public health sciences, assessment and analysis, policy and program management, financial management and budgeting, partnerships and collaboration, social and cultural determinants, communication, and leadership. CONCLUSIONS: This study produced a consensus set of core competencies and domains in ...
BASE