Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
31 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Haufe-Management-Praxis
In: European Financial Management, Band 19, Heft 4, S. 631-657
SSRN
In: USC CLEO Research Paper No. C13-8
SSRN
Working paper
In: Outubro: revista do Instituto de Estudos Socialistas, Heft 17, S. 41-65
ISSN: 1516-6333
In: Historical materialism: research in critical marxist theory, Band 15, Heft 2, S. 3-19
ISSN: 1569-206X
AbstractTen years ago, Eric Hobsbawm presented his Deutscher Lecture on 'Can We Write the History of the Russian Revolution?' This essay argues that Hobsbawm articulated a perspective on the Russian Revolution that was shared by a much wider audience on the Left after the fall of the Soviet Union and that many of these arguments continue to resonate today. Placing the contours of the historiographical discussion of the Russian Revolution within a broader political context, I argue that Hobsbawm has underestimated the extent to which the standard academic accounts intentionally have marginalised Marxist interpretations. Hobsbawm's own ambivalence toward the October Revolution and his lack of clarity on the origins of Stalinism are not supported by the latest empirical research and concede much ground to strident anti-Marxists. Rather than refuting the Marxist classics, new evidence from the archives of the former Soviet Union actually offers substantial support. The renewed academic attacks on the Russian Revolution, including the deliberate omission of evidence that support the Marxist interpretation, should be challenged rather than embraced by socialists.
In: Employment relations today, Band 20, Heft 1, S. 47-62
ISSN: 1520-6459
In: The Rand journal of economics, Band 17, Heft 1, S. 59
ISSN: 1756-2171
In: Social science quarterly, Band 100, Heft 6, S. 2277-2301
ISSN: 1540-6237
ObjectiveWe compare academic achievement in charter schools versus two types of traditional public school in the State of Michigan over a 10‐year period. Charter schools serve as a reform measure for failing public schools, so the natural research question is: Do charter schools generate higher achievement levels than observationally comparable public schools?MethodsWe have assembled a longitudinal data set spanning academic years 2002/2003–2011/2012 containing proficiency rates on standardized math and reading tests for Grades 4, 7, and 11. Our set of control variables includes demographic measures, free lunch eligibility, school characteristics, funding per student, and locational measures. We model unobserved heterogeneity using random effects estimation.ResultsWe find that Michigan charter schools significantly underperform traditional public schools in both subjects and in all three grade levels early in the study period. These gaps narrow considerably, and in some cases disappear, by the end of the period.ConclusionMichigan is noteworthy among states with charter schools for its deregulated and competitive charter environment. Our results suggest that Michigan charters nevertheless were doing about as well on the state's academic achievement tests as observationally comparable public schools by the end of the period.
In: Accepted and forthcoming at The Accounting Review
SSRN
Working paper
In: Journal of Financial Economics (JFE), Band 85
SSRN
In: American economic review, Band 94, Heft 2, S. 192-196
ISSN: 1944-7981
In: Journal of political economy, Band 100, Heft 3, S. 468-505
ISSN: 1537-534X
In: Journal of political economy, Band 100, Heft 3, S. 468
ISSN: 0022-3808
SSRN