Trainingsprogramm Schlüsselqualifikationen: die besten Übungen aus Karriere-Seminaren
In: Berufsstrategie
22 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Berufsstrategie
In: Hamburger Schriften zur Marketingforschung 5
In: Dokumentationsdienst Asien
In: Reihe A, Spezialbibliographien 19
World Affairs Online
In: Internationale Arbeitsstandards in einer globalisierten Welt, S. 224-242
Dieser Titel kann als gedrucktes Buch über den interact Verlag bezogen werden
BASE
Dieser Titel kann als gedrucktes Buch über den interact Verlag bezogen werden
BASE
Dieser Titel kann als gedrucktes Buch über den interact Verlag bezogen werden. ; + Auflage: 1
BASE
In: Natural hazards and earth system sciences: NHESS, Band 17, Heft 12, S. 2075-2092
ISSN: 1684-9981
Abstract. Flood damage can be mitigated if the parties at risk are reached by flood warnings and if they know how to react appropriately. To gain more knowledge about warning reception and emergency response of private households and companies, surveys were undertaken after the August 2002 and the June 2013 floods in Germany. Despite pronounced regional differences, the results show a clear overall picture: in 2002, early warnings did not work well; e.g. many households (27 %) and companies (45 %) stated that they had not received any flood warnings. Additionally, the preparedness of private households and companies was low in 2002, mainly due to a lack of flood experience. After the 2002 flood, many initiatives were launched and investments undertaken to improve flood risk management, including early warnings and an emergency response in Germany. In 2013, only a small share of the affected households (5 %) and companies (3 %) were not reached by any warnings. Additionally, private households and companies were better prepared. For instance, the share of companies which have an emergency plan in place has increased from 10 % in 2002 to 34 % in 2013. However, there is still room for improvement, which needs to be triggered mainly by effective risk and emergency communication. The challenge is to continuously maintain and advance an integrated early warning and emergency response system even without the occurrence of extreme floods.
In: Natural hazards and earth system sciences: NHESS, Band 22, Heft 1, S. 165-185
ISSN: 1684-9981
Abstract. Several severe flood events hit Germany in recent years,
with events in 2013 and 2016 being the most destructive ones, although
dynamics and flood processes were very different. While the 2013 event was a
slowly rising widespread fluvial flood accompanied by some severe dike
breaches, the events in 2016 were fast-onset pluvial floods, which resulted in surface water flooding in some places due to limited capacities of the drainage systems and in destructive flash floods with high sediment loads and clogging in others, particularly in small steep catchments. Hence,
different pathways, i.e. different routes that the water takes to reach (and
potentially damage) receptors, in our case private households, can be
identified in both events. They can thus be regarded as spatially compound
flood events or compound inland floods. This paper analyses how differently
affected residents coped with these different flood types (fluvial and
pluvial) and their impacts while accounting for the different pathways
(river flood, dike breach, surface water flooding and flash flood) within
the compound events. The analyses are based on two data sets with 1652 (for
the 2013 flood) and 601 (for the 2016 flood) affected residents who were
surveyed around 9 months after each flood, revealing little
socio-economic differences – except for income – between the two samples. The
four pathways showed significant differences with regard to their hydraulic
and financial impacts, recovery, warning processes, and coping and
adaptive behaviour. There are just small differences with regard to
perceived self-efficacy and responsibility, offering entry points for
tailored risk communication and support to improve property-level
adaptation.
In June 2013, widespread flooding and consequent damage and losses occurred in Central Europe, especially in Germany. This paper explores what data are available to investigate the adverse impacts of the event, what kind of information can be retrieved from these data and how well data and information fulfil requirements that were recently proposed for disaster reporting on the European and international levels. In accordance with the European Floods Directive (2007/60/EC), impacts on human health, economic activities (and assets), cultural heritage and the environment are described on the national and sub-national scale. Information from governmental reports is complemented by communications on traffic disruptions and surveys of flood-affected residents and companies. Overall, the impacts of the flood event in 2013 were manifold. The study reveals that flood-affected residents suffered from a large range of impacts, among which mental health and supply problems were perceived more seriously than financial losses. The most frequent damage type among affected companies was business interruption. This demonstrates that the current scientific focus on direct (financial) damage is insufficient to describe the overall impacts and severity of flood events. The case further demonstrates that procedures and standards for impact data collection in Germany are widely missing. Present impact data in Germany are fragmentary, heterogeneous, incomplete and difficult to access. In order to fulfil, for example, the monitoring and reporting requirements of the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030 that was adopted in March 2015 in Sendai, Japan, more efforts on impact data collection are needed.
BASE