Suchergebnisse

The whiteness of consent / Jordan Pascoe -- Literatures of consent / Samantha Wallace -- SM, the law & an opaque sexual consent narrative / Alexandra Grolimund -- What's in a name (or even pronoun)? / EJ Francis Caris-Hamer -- "What do i call this?" : the role of consent in LGBTQA+ sexual practices and victimization experiences / Brooke de Heer -- How drunk is "too drunk" to consent? A summary of research on alcohol intoxication and sexual consent / Kristen Jozkowski and Carli Hoffacker -- Two wrongs make it right : perceptions of intoxicated consent / Laurie James-Hawkins and Veronica Lamarche -- Developing shared understandings of consent with young people / Cristyn Davies, Kerry H. Robinson, and Melissa Kang, with the Wellbeing, Health & Youth (WH&Y) Commission -- The right to withdraw consent to continuing an unwanted pregnancy / Aoife Duffy -- Unlearning agreement : imagining the law without consent / Patricia Palacios Zuloaga -- Consent work : facilitating informed consent in labour and childbirth / Laura Pascoe -- Consent and work : a postfeminist analysis of women's acquiescence to long working hours / Patricia Lewis -- Consent isn't just a girl's thing : consent and image based sexual abuse / Claire Meehan -- Negotiating consent in online kinky spaces / Liam Wignall and Mark McCormack -- Molka : consent, resistance, and the spy-cam epidemic in South Korea / Sarah Molisso -- Negotiating power, pleasure and agency in online sex work : unpacking what "consent" means in the context of "camming" / Panteá Farvid, Rebekah Nathan, Juliana Riccardi and Abigail Whitmer -- Sex games gone wrong : consent in the courts / Alexandra Fanghanel -- The mediation of school-based consent education debates in Australia / Kellie Burns, Suzanne Egan, Victoria Rawlings and Hannah Hayes -- Sex work politics and consent : the consequences of sexual morality / Helen Rand and Jessica Simpson -- Victim and perpetrator : reflecting upon sexual consent, autism and/or learning difficulties / Chrissie Rogers -- Whose consent? : donor conception, anonymity and rights / Róisín Ryan-Flood.

Condom use among college men in the United States is notoriously erratic, yet we know little about these men's approaches to other contraceptives. In this paper, accounts from 44 men attending a university in the western United States reveal men's reliance on culturally situated ideas about gender, social class, race, and age in assessing the risk of pregnancy and STI acquisition in sexual encounters with women. Men reason that race- and class-privileged college women are STI-free, responsible for contraception, and will pursue abortion services if necessary. Since men expect women will take responsibility, they often stay silent about condoms and other contraceptives in sexual encounters—a process we term "strategic silence." Men's strategic silence helps uphold local constructions of hegemonic masculinity that prioritize men's sexual desires and protects these constructions by subtly shifting contraceptive and sexual health responsibility onto women. Our analysis demonstrates the importance of men's expectations of women for upholding constructions of hegemonic masculinity, which legitimate gender inequality in intimacy and are related to men's underestimation of the risks associated with condom-free sex.

"This book explores 'difficult conversations' in feminist theory as an integral part of social and theoretical transformations. Focussing on intersectionality within feminist theory, this book critically addresses questions of power and difference as a central feminist concern, rather than assuming that the needs and experiences of elite women apply to all women. It presents ethical, political, social, and emotional dilemmas while negotiating difficult conversations, particularly in terms of sexuality, class, 'race', ethnicity, and cross-identification between the researcher and researched. Topics covered include challenging cultural relativism; queer marginalisation; research and affect; and feminism and the digital realm. This book is aimed primarily at students, lecturers and researchers interested in epistemology, research methodology, gender, identity, and social theory. The interdisciplinary nature of the book is aimed at reaching the broadest possible audience, including those engaged with feminist theory, anthropology, social policy, sociology, psychology, and geography"--

"This book explores 'difficult conversations' in feminist theory as an integral part of social and theoretical transformations. Focussing on intersectionality within feminist theory, this book critically addresses questions of power and difference as a central feminist concern, rather than assuming that the needs and experiences of elite women apply to all women. It presents ethical, political, social, and emotional dilemmas while negotiating difficult conversations, particularly in terms of sexuality, class, 'race', ethnicity, and cross-identification between the researcher and researched. Topics covered include challenging cultural relativism; queer marginalisation; research and affect; and feminism and the digital realm. This book is aimed primarily at students, lecturers and researchers interested in epistemology, research methodology, gender, identity, and social theory. The interdisciplinary nature of the book is aimed at reaching the broadest possible audience, including those engaged with feminist theory, anthropology, social policy, sociology, psychology, and geography"--

The COVID-19 pandemic upended home life for couples across the globe. Many couples faced increased relational uncertainty and interference from a partner as a result of stay at home and lockdown orders. This study uses relational turbulence theory to examine how (a) relational uncertainty and (b) partner interdependence are associated with cognitions and emotions about needing space conversations with a partner. We examine links between perceptions of needing space conversations and relational turbulence. In the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, 609 adults in a romantic relationship from 29 countries completed an online survey. Relationship uncertainty was negatively associated with relational cognitions (i.e., solidarity and intimacy), and interference from a partner was associated with more intense hopeful feelings about needing space conversations. Relational cognitions were associated with reduced relational turbulence, and hope was associated with higher relational turbulence. Theoretical implications for relational turbulence theory and practical implications for couples are discussed.