Suchergebnisse
Filter
32 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Gefährliche Stille: Deutschland weiß nicht, was es will : Berlin muss seine Interessen und Werte aktiver vertreten : ein Plädoyer für das Ende der Anbiederung
In: Internationale Politik: das Magazin für globales Denken, Band 74, Heft 3, S. 46-53
ISSN: 1430-175X
World Affairs Online
Texas Death Row and the Cummins Prison Farm in Arkansas
In: Southern cultures, Band 13, Heft 2, S. 112-129
ISSN: 1534-1488
The "Soft War" for Europe's East: Russia and the West Square Off
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 137, S. [np]
ISSN: 0146-5945
Argues that the US faces a "soft war" with Russia over influence, alignment, & values manifest in three distinct campaign objectives in the political competition for Europe eastern borderlands. In this light, the case is made that a European strategy for the Black Sea region is a revisionist strategy & will necessarily be competitive with Russia's perceived interests. Aspects of competition with Russia in the political, economic, & security dimensions are identified. Necessary elements of a Black Sea strategy capable of contending with the problem of Russia are outlined. Adapted from the source document.
Seeing Wide
In: Contexts / American Sociological Association: understanding people in their social worlds, Band 4, Heft 1, S. 48-55
ISSN: 1537-6052
In the Arctic with Malaurie
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 100, Heft 2, S. 275-282
ISSN: 1548-1433
In October 1997, the author accompanied French anthropogeographer Jean Malaurie on a two‐week trip in and around Nome, Alaska, in preparation for a circumpolar conference to be held in St. Petersburg in 1999. This essay describes encounters and conversations with area residents that took place during that trip, as well as observations of and on the courts, shamans, language, the tundra, and the aurora borealis.
Killing time: Life in the Arkansas penitentiary
In: Qualitative sociology, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 21-32
ISSN: 1573-7837
The Post-Soviet Twilight
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 177
ISSN: 0146-5945
In November 2012, Russian President Vladimir Putin and German Chancellor Angela Merkel met reluctantly in Moscow for the annual German-Russian summit. It was widely reported that the summit, which had already been abbreviated to a few hours, did not go well. In reality, the summit succeeded in contradicting itself. Merkel infuriated Putin by suggesting that the imprisonment of the members of punk rock band Pussy Riot might be a human rights violation. This caused Putin to cite Pussy Riot as a case of illegal anti-Semitism which, he suggested, would be something Germany should understand. Despite the apparent political antagonism, the Summit concluded with German industrial giant Siemens signing a 2.5 billion euro deal with the Russian state railway for 675 railroad engines. What is so remarkable about the outcome -- Merkel playing to idealism, Putin pandering to nationalism, and both agreeing on trade -- is that the November summit was the product of a hard-fought strategic review in Berlin pitting human rights romantics against economic pragmatists. Neither side won nor altered the uncomfortable status quo in any recognizable way. Adapted from the source document.
The European Union Goes East
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 166
ISSN: 0146-5945
November 22, 2010, was an inauspicious day to hold a summit in Brussels between the European Union and Ukraine. Officials were still straggling back from Lisbon after the previous weekend's NATO and EU summits, and they were dreading the looming financial crisis in Ireland and the possibility of conflict in Korea. By June 2010, otherwise sensible think tanks in Washington and Brussels were seriously debating whether Ukraine might have departed the Euro-Atlantic world entirely and returned to some trade association of Slavic tribes on the Russian steppe. And this is what makes the November 22nd meeting so remarkable: A roomful of unelected officials unexpectedly launched a policy aimed at the comprehensive engagement of Europe's east. With a single communique, a handful of European bureaucrats in Brussels brought Kiev into a closer association with European institutions than it has had in hundreds of years, if ever. Adapted from the source document.
The European Union goes east: a patient policy of long-term partnership
In: Policy review, Heft 166, S. ca. 5 S
World Affairs Online
A Turning Point for Europe's East: The Next Decade Will Determine Its Direction
In: Policy review: the journal of American citizenship, Heft 160
ISSN: 0146-5945
Argues that post-Soviet Eastern Europe has entered a new historical period based on an unprecedented realignment in trade & multilateral institutions in European Union-Eastern European relations. At issue is how the region arrived at this point & when did things move away from integration & NATO expansion. It is contended that the new period began in 2009 & is marked by four key geopolitical developments: global recession; ideological reversal precipitated by the Russian-Georgian war; reconsideration of US national interests in the eastern Euro-Atlantic; & a reformulation of US's Russia policy. Characteristics of the new period are described. Attention is given to issues of identity with respect to Ukraine, likening EU relations with the country to those with Turkey, as well as to political-economic assertions. Some EU & Ukraine policy considerations are touched on in closing, highlighting the advent of soft power integration of the East. Adapted from the source document.
A turning point for Europe's East: the next decade will determine its direction
In: Policy review, Heft 160, S. ca. 7 S
World Affairs Online