Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Alternativ können Sie versuchen, selbst über Ihren lokalen Bibliothekskatalog auf das gewünschte Dokument zuzugreifen.
Bei Zugriffsproblemen kontaktieren Sie uns gern.
13 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
World Affairs Online
In: Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine, Band 6, Heft 2, S. 81-120
Cover -- Book Title -- Copyright -- Table of Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Foreword -- Introduction -- Chapter 1 Peter -- Chapter 2 A Build Up To Murder -- Chapter 3 Wilma McCann -- Chapter 4 Emily Jackson -- Chapter 5 Marcella Claxton -- Chapter 6 Irene Richardson -- Chapter 7 Patricia Atkinson -- Chapter 8 Jayne MacDonald -- Chapter 9 Maureen Long -- Chapter 10 Jean Jordan -- Chapter 11 Marilyn Moore -- Plate section -- Chapter 12 Yvonne Pearson -- Chapter 13 Elena Rytka -- Chapter 14 Vera Millward -- Chapter 15 Josephine Whitaker -- Chapter 16 I'm Jack -- Chapter 17 Barbara Leach -- Chapter 18 Marguerite Walls -- Chapter 19 Upadhya Bandara -- Chapter 20 Theresa Sykes -- Chapter 21 Jacqueline Hill -- Chapter 22 The Ripper Unmasked -- Chapter 23 Mad Or Bad? -- Epilogue -- Bibliography -- Index -- Back Cover.
In: Foreign affairs: an American quarterly review, Band 61, Heft 5, S. 1203
ISSN: 2327-7793
In: Population: revue bimestrielle de l'Institut National d'Etudes Démographiques. French edition, Band 35, Heft 1, S. 239
ISSN: 0718-6568, 1957-7966
Richard Cobb is one of the most active and influential English historians of France. During a long career of research and writing, his interest has ranged from the Revolution to Vichy. He is especially renowned for his seminal work on the popular movement and on popular attitudes and preoccupations during the Revolution, as well as on its provincial history. This collection of essays is written by his friends, and is dedicated to him. The essays reflect some of the issues that have preoccupied Richard Cobb. Focused on some less familiar corners of the history of the Directory and the Consulate, it is concerned with regional and social rather than metropolitan and political history
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 11, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087
In: Journal of defense analytics and logistics, Band 5, Heft 1, S. 77-94
ISSN: 2399-6439
Purpose
The US Government is challenged to maintain pace as the world's de facto provider of space object cataloging data. Augmenting capabilities with nontraditional sensors present an expeditious and low-cost improvement. However, the large tradespace and unexplored system of systems performance requirements pose a challenge to successful capitalization. This paper aims to better define and assess the utility of augmentation via a multi-disiplinary study.
Design/methodology/approach
Hypothetical telescope architectures are modeled and simulated on two separate days, then evaluated against performance measures and constraints using multi-objective optimization in a heuristic algorithm. Decision analysis and Pareto optimality identifies a set of high-performing architectures while preserving decision-maker design flexibility.
Findings
Capacity, coverage and maximum time unobserved are recommended as key performance measures. A total of 187 out of 1017 architectures were identified as top performers. A total of 29% of the sensors considered are found in over 80% of the top architectures. Additional considerations further reduce the tradespace to 19 best choices which collect an average of 49–51 observations per space object with a 595–630 min average maximum time unobserved, providing redundant coverage of the Geosynchronous Orbit belt. This represents a three-fold increase in capacity and coverage and a 2 h (16%) decrease in the maximum time unobserved compared to the baseline government-only architecture as-modeled.
Originality/value
This study validates the utility of an augmented network concept using a physics-based model and modern analytical techniques. It objectively responds to policy mandating cataloging improvements without relying solely on expert-derived point solutions.
This report, Conflict Prevention and Security Cooperation in the Arctic Region: Frameworks for the Future, captures consensus of the Newport Arctic Scholars Initiative 2020 scholars. Building upon the 2018-2019 NASI work on the limitations of the current cooperative security fora in the Arctic region, this cohort explored existing international frameworks and assessed their abilities to ensure freedom and security in the Arctic through political-military means. NASI 2020 also examined existing frameworks to determine whether they enabled increased dialogue and maritime security cooperation in the region. The frameworks were further evaluated for their abilities to prevent and manage conflict and enhance cooperation on areas of common security and defense interests in the region. Scholars were tasked to identify new frameworks that could be useful in establishing – and maintaining – open channels of communication, preventing conflict, and enhancing cooperation on areas of common security and defense interests among nations and navies in the Arctic region. Finally, the group sought to identify practical arrangements for a future meeting or summit that could bring together states to enhance dialogue on security and cooperation in the Arctic region.
BASE