Suchergebnisse
Filter
15 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
SSRN
All-in Fighting
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2021-16
SSRN
Fair Representation in Primaries: Heterogeneity and the New Hampshire Effect
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2020-07
SSRN
Overzealous Rule Makers
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2020-11
SSRN
Winner's Effort Maximization in Large Contests
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2020-13
SSRN
Winners' Efforts in Multi-Battle Team Contests
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2019-03
SSRN
Biasing Dynamic Contests Between Ex-Ante Symmetric Players
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2018-06
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
Profit-Maximizing Sale of a Discrete Public Good via the Subscription Game in Private-Information Environments
In: The B.E. journal of theoretical economics, Band 10, Heft 1
ISSN: 1935-1704
We analyze a symmetric Bayesian game in which two players individually contribute to fund a discrete public good; contributions are refunded if they do not reach a threshold set by the seller of the good. We characterize the distributions of players' private values that can support a symmetric equilibrium in continuous piecewise-linear strategies, and we calculate these strategies. Allowing the seller to charge an entry fee before players make their private contributions, we show these piecewise-linear equilibrium strategies maximize the seller's expected profit over all incentive compatible selling mechanisms.
SSRN
Working paper
Correlated Play in Weakest-Link and Best-Shot Group Contests
In: JME-D-23-00280
SSRN
Preemption contests between groups
In: The Rand journal of economics, Band 51, Heft 3, S. 934-961
ISSN: 1756-2171
AbstractWe consider a preemption game between competing groups; firms lobbying individually for their groups' interests provide an empirical example. Among symmetric groups, the first firm to take action bears an (unobserved) cost and wins the prize on behalf of its group. In equilibrium, the firm with the lowest cost takes action, but with delay. More competition and a smaller ratio of costs to benefits reduce delay. Firms in larger groups wait longer, but group action can occur earlier, as the probability of a low‐cost firm is higher. Asymmetries in group size or strength of externalities also matter.
Preemption Contests Between Groups
In: Working Paper of the Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance No. 2019-09
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper