An Ecological Basis for Managing Giant Sequoia Ecosystems
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 110-128
ISSN: 1432-1009
52 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 30, Heft 1, S. 110-128
ISSN: 1432-1009
This paper provides a history of the development of the scientific research program at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI) during the period 1968–1994 from the perspective of one of the scientists involved. The years following the 1968 hiring of Bruce Kilgore as the first park-based research scientist at SEKI saw the growth of a research program that included three permanent research-grade scientists and their support staff. This nucleus was successful in attracting both outside funding and leading university and government scientists to work on issues of importance to the parks and to society at large, topics that included fire ecology and management, black bears, wilderness impacts, acid deposition, and climate change. During this time the SEKI scientists' role expanded from one focused primarily on the personal research on issues of immediate importance to the park, to increasing responsibilities for marketing and coordinating a growing program of collaborative research that also addressed regional and national priorities. This, in turn, required that the park scientists increasingly become generalists, able to converse in a number of scientific disciplines as well as communicate with non-scientists. Finally, keys to success and lessons learned are discussed.
BASE
This paper provides a history of the development of the scientific research program at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (SEKI) during the period 1968–1994 from the perspective of one of the scientists involved. The years following the 1968 hiring of Bruce Kilgore as the first park-based research scientist at SEKI saw the growth of a research program that included three permanent research-grade scientists and their support staff. This nucleus was successful in attracting both outside funding and leading university and government scientists to work on issues of importance to the parks and to society at large, topics that included fire ecology and management, black bears, wilderness impacts, acid deposition, and climate change. During this time the SEKI scientists' role expanded from one focused primarily on the personal research on issues of immediate importance to the park, to increasing responsibilities for marketing and coordinating a growing program of collaborative research that also addressed regional and national priorities. This, in turn, required that the park scientists increasingly become generalists, able to converse in a number of scientific disciplines as well as communicate with non-scientists. Finally, keys to success and lessons learned are discussed.
BASE
In: Netherlands international law review: NILR ; international law - conflict of laws, Band 21, Heft 2, S. 218
ISSN: 1741-6191
In: American anthropologist: AA, Band 121, Heft 1, S. 258-259
ISSN: 1548-1433
In: Canadian journal of family and youth: CJFY, Band 13, Heft 3, S. 170-174
ISSN: 1718-9748
In: Open cultural studies, Band 1, Heft 1, S. 678-689
ISSN: 2451-3474
Abstract
I have written this article in order to establish Patrick Kelly as a black forbearer of fashion. Kelly complicates our sense of fashion through his use of black memorabilia and camp to not only create something consumable but to comment on the black body as a consumable. Therefore, the role I play in acknowledging this black supernova, as Eric Darnell Pritchard calls him, is by critiquing Lewis and Fraley's critique of Patrick Kelly and questioning why overtly expressing one's queerness through camp has not been seen as a viable form of black expression in the mainstream narrative of black creativity. Lewis and Fraley's complete dismissal of Kelly's use of camp does not happen in a vacuum. Yet, I must remember that there is also the task of establishing a legacy of technique for Patrick Kelly. Who are his forbearers?
In: American journal of international law: AJIL, Band 69, Heft 1, S. 202-203
ISSN: 2161-7953
In: Society and natural resources, Band 33, Heft 6, S. 721-737
ISSN: 1521-0723
In: Environmental management: an international journal for decision makers, scientists, and environmental auditors, Band 52, Heft 6, S. 1400-1414
ISSN: 1432-1009
In: A Sequoia seminar
In: Clothing Cultures, Band 9, Heft 1, S. 45-74
ISSN: 2050-0742
Sew Me a Quilt. Tell You a Story. was a performative conversation between Sequoia Barnes and Carol Tulloch that took place at the Fruitmarket Gallery, Edinburgh (25 April 2019). It was in response to the exhibition Senga Nengudi (16 March–26 May 2019), notably her work Ceremony for Freeway Frets (1979) and the RSVP series. These feature costume and textiles associated with Black bodies which Barnes argues lean on the concept of fashioning – establishing design, making and aesthetic codes engineered by and superimposed onto marginalized people – a theme that Barnes explores in her research practice. For Tulloch these works reflect styling – the construction of self through the assemblage of garments, accessories, hairstyles and beauty regimes that may, or may not, be 'in fashion' at the time of use. To style one's body is part of everyday life, which is agency and a form of self-telling. 'Fashioning' and 'styling' are different, yet equally valid, approaches to thinking about making the self. In this article we will discuss how exploration of the concepts Black fashioning and Black styling informed the performance Sew Me a Quilt. Tell You a Story. through two women hand-stitching a quilt, a joint act that is a longstanding signifier of Black women's making traditions, storytelling and communal experience. As two Black women who are culturally and generationally different – Barnes is African American and Tulloch is Black British – our shared diasporic connections to quilt-making engendered our pursuit of authorship and agency through making in the otherwise privileged space of the 'white cube gallery'. Additionally, the article will discuss how this performative conversation blurred the lines between making and performance, materiality and lived experiences as well as how our performative exchange of knowledge – academic, cultural and political – created something that went beyond the usual experience of visiting a gallery to 'look at art' to seeing and listening. The original idea for the performance, instigated by Barnes, was for her and Tulloch to talk while hand-stitching an unfinished quilt, which Tulloch began in 2010, in front of an audience they were not to engage with. The intention was to hold space for the audience to enable listening. In practice, the performative conversation also held space for: different kinds of conversations and listening; emotional experiences and healing; and consideration of how Tulloch and Barnes fashion/style their own identities through memories as they stitched towards completing a quilt as a form of remembrance.
In: CELL-REPORTS-D-19-04673
SSRN
In: Ecology and society: E&S ; a journal of integrative science for resilience and sustainability, Band 28, Heft 1
ISSN: 1708-3087