Suchergebnisse
Filter
Format
Medientyp
Sprache
Weitere Sprachen
Jahre
18489 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
Soldiers' bonus
In: American political science review, Band 18, S. 559-565
ISSN: 0003-0554
Traces briefly the developments during the past two years.
Killing Soldiers
In: Ethics & international affairs, Band 20, Heft 4, S. 455-475
ISSN: 1747-7093
A riddle in the ethics of war concerns whether lethal defensive force may be justifiably used against aggressing soldiers who are morally innocent. In this essay I argue that although there might be reasons for excusing soldiers as individuals, one may be justified in using defensive force against them provided that they have initiated threatening behavior and that our interpretation of that behavior as threatening is reasonable. I go on to investigate various implications of being in conflict with aggressing soldiers who are morally innocent, arguing that different restrictions apply to the use of defensive force when the aggressors cannot be held morally responsible for being aggressors.My argument has important practical implications both for deciding whether to go to war and for deciding how to fight a just defensive war. Concerning the ongoing Iraq war, for example, it suggests that if it were only a matter of killing culpable members of the Republican Guard, invasion could perhaps have been justified. Since any attack would involve killing innocent conscripted soldiers as well as innocent civilians, however, there were good reasons to wait to see whether options other than intervening militarily would become available. If we are engaged in a just defensive war, my argument implies that we must accept a higher level of risk and more harm if we can assume that the aggressors are innocent rather than morally responsible for their harmful or threatening behavior.
Killing Soldiers
In: Ethics & international affairs, Band 20, Heft 4, S. [np]
ISSN: 0892-6794
A riddle in the ethics of war concerns whether lethal defensive force may be justifiably used against aggressing soldiers who are morally innocent. In this essay I argue that although there might be reasons for excusing soldiers as individuals, one may be justified in using defensive force against them provided that they have initiated threatening behavior and that our interpretation of that behavior as threatening is reasonable. I go on to investigate various implications of being in conflict with aggressing soldiers who are morally innocent, arguing that different restrictions apply to the use of defensive force when the aggressors cannot be held morally responsible for being aggressors. My argument has important practical implications both for deciding whether to go to war and for deciding how to fight a just defensive war. Concerning the ongoing Iraq war, for example, it suggests that if it were only a matter of killing culpable members of the Republican Guard, invasion could perhaps have been justified. Since any attack would involve killing innocent conscripted soldiers as well as innocent civilians, however, there were good reasons to wait to see whether options other than intervening militarily would become available. If we are engaged in a just defensive war, my argument implies that we must accept a higher level of risk and more harm if we can assume that the aggressors are innocent rather than morally responsible for their harmful or threatening behavior. Adapted from the source document.
Child soldiers
In: The bulletin of the atomic scientists: a magazine of science and public affairs, Band 53, S. 32-39
ISSN: 0096-3402, 0096-5243, 0742-3829
Dogface Soldiers
Dogface Soldiers ist eine interdisziplinäre und bildbasierte Kulturgeschichte US-amerikanischer Infanterieschützen des europäischen Zweiten Weltkriegs. Methodisch werden konventionelle Grenzen der Histriogarpahie überschritten und Anleihen bei Clifford Geertz und seiner anthropologischen "Thick Description", sowie bei comprehensive analysis-Modellen militärisch-operativer Provenienz genommen. ; Dogface Soldiers is an interdisciplinary and image centered cultural history of the Army of the United States' infantry riflemen in the Mediterranean- and European Theaters of Operations of World War II. Its methods transcend the boundaries of conventional historiography and make use of Clifford Geertz's anthropological method of thick description as well as military used comprehensive analysis methods.
BASE
Dogface Soldiers
Dogface Soldiers ist eine interdisziplinäre und bildbasierte Kulturgeschichte US-amerikanischer Infanterieschützen des europäischen Zweiten Weltkriegs. Methodisch werden konventionelle Grenzen der Histriogarpahie überschritten und Anleihen bei Clifford Geertz und seiner anthropologischen "Thick Description", sowie bei comprehensive analysis-Modellen militärisch-operativer Provenienz genommen. ; Dogface Soldiers is an interdisciplinary and image centered cultural history of the Army of the United States' infantry riflemen in the Mediterranean- and European Theaters of Operations of World War II. Its methods transcend the boundaries of conventional historiography and make use of Clifford Geertz's anthropological method of thick description as well as military used comprehensive analysis methods.
BASE
Fucking Soldiers
In: Index on censorship, Band 31, Heft 4, S. 87-92
ISSN: 1746-6067
THE BLAME FOR AFRICA'S AIDS EPIDEMIC FALLS ON WARS, SOLDIERS AND CULTURES OF MILITARISATION. FIGHTING IT DEMANDS BETTER RESOURCES AND LEADERSHIP THAN AVAILABLE AT PRESENT
Citizen Soldiers
In: Armed forces & society: official journal of the Inter-University Seminar on Armed Forces and Society : an interdisciplinary journal, Band 25, Heft 3, S. 527-529
ISSN: 0095-327X
Franck reviews 'Citizen Soldiers' by Stephen E. Ambrose.
Soldiers' tales
In: Index on censorship, Band 28, Heft 5, S. 156-168
ISSN: 1746-6067
Mehmedin Kitab (Mehmed's Book) by Nadire Mater is the Story of life in the Turkish army on the southeastern front as told by 42 of the 220,000 conscripts who have fought for their country in its civil war against the Kurds. On 23 June this year Mehmedin Kitab: soldiers who have fought in the Southeast speak out, to give it its full title, was banned by an Istanbul court on charges of 'insulting and belittling the military'. The court also ordered the seizure of all existing copies. The military took its time: the book had been around since April and was already in its fourth reprint when it made its views known. Maybe it was the prospect of an English-language translation, already delivered to an editor with a view to UK or US publication, that alarmed the sclerotic generals who still rule Turkey. This is undoubtedly one of the most important and explosive books to come out of Turkey in the last decade. The soldiers' testimony exposes the army, the politicians and makes it clear that this is an 'unnecessary' and 'unjust' war that is driving the country to bankcrupcy and political suicide. 'I fear we are storing up the wrath to come,' says one of the 'Mehmets' - a generic term for the conscript squaddies