The Ukrainian translation of Paul Grice's article "Meaning". Translated by Yaroslav Petik and Dmytro Sepetyi: Grice, H., P. (Jul., 1957). Meaning. The Philosophical Review, Vol.66, 3, 377-388.
1 Grices Sprachtheorie -- 1.1 Eine Art Konversationsethik -- 1.2 Notiz zu Person und Werk von Paul Grice -- 1.3 BedeutungNN und Implikatur: Die Architektur der Griceschen Sprachtheorie -- 2 Das Konzept der nicht-natürlichen Bedeutung -- 2.1 Kriterien für natürliche und nicht-natürliche Bedeutung -- 2.2 Zur intentionalen Erklärung der nicht-natürlichen Bedeutung -- 2.3 Zum Handlungscharakter des Griceschen Bedeutungskonzepts -- 2.4 Über Problematisierungen des Griceschen Analysans -- 2.5 Das 'Gricesche Programm' -- 3 Die Theorie der Implikaturen -- 3.1 Hintergrund und Kern der Theorie -- 3.2 Sagen und Meinen -- 3.3 Merkmale konversationaler Implikaturen -- 3.4 Arten von Implikaturen -- 3.5 Der Hintergrund des Hintergrunds der Implikaturen -- 3.6 Risiken und Gefahren der Kommunikation -- 3.7 Konversationsmaximen und Geltungsansprüche -- 4 Eine Verallgemeinerung der Griceschen Theorie der Implikaturen -- 4.1 Zum Erklärungspotential der Griceschen Theorie -- 4.2 Vandervekens Verallgemeinerungsvorschlag -- 4.3 Weitere Maximen für sprachliches Handeln -- 4.4 Weitere Beispiele für Implikaturen -- 4.5 Zur Frage der Reduktion der Konversationsmaximen -- Namenverzeichnis.
Zugriffsoptionen:
Die folgenden Links führen aus den jeweiligen lokalen Bibliotheken zum Volltext:
Malcolm Le Grice, a filmmaker and intermedia artist active in the Arts Lab and the London Film Makers' Cooperative, revisits the emergence of the British independent and expanded cinema scene, reinscribing it in a highly politicised context. Opposing the logic of medium specificity, he reinscribes his experimentations with expanded cinema in a strategy of discursive construction that challenges the flatly representational logic of narrative cinema.
Abstract This paper assesses Grice's work on conversational implicature in the light of one of its early targets: Austin's claim that we cannot isolate the meaning of an expression from the context in which it is used. Grice argues that we can separate the literal meaning of many utterances from their pragmatic implicatures through the mechanism of explicit cancellation. However, Grice's conception of cancellation does not account for the fact that an explicit cancellation must be uttered, and that its utterance involves further implicatures that undermine the attempted cancellation. What Grice calls explicit cancellations are better understood as utterances that resolve ambiguities, and hence apply only in cases where there exists an ambiguity that needs resolving. If Grice's work does not undermine Austin, we are in a position to reassess an Austinian form of philosophical criticism that emphasizes the ordinary usage of expressions deployed in philosophical arguments.
Abstract. Marjorie Grice‐Hutchinson is well‐known for her contributions to economic science. However, very few people outside Malaga (the city in the south of Spain where she lived most of her life) are aware of the philanthropic activities that she and her father undertook in the years that preceded and followed the Spanish Civil War (1936–1939).Thanks to the efforts of Marjorie and her father, many survived political murder during the Spanish Civil War, tuberculosis, or starvation. Besides, thanks to the charity school that Marjorie and her father opened, many girls of the area received some education, overcoming the secular analphabetism and misery lasting generations.These lines are meant to honor the memory of a prestigious economist from a different perspective and with the purpose that future generations know the way she helped other human beings (including my own family) in a totally unselfish way.
In: Political science quarterly: a nonpartisan journal devoted to the study and analysis of government, politics and international affairs ; PSQ, Band 26, Heft 3, S. 543-545
The paper considers new logical semantics for the classic propositional logic which states that a propositional formula refers to a special structure – "the tree of messages". This tree of message determines the truth values for the elements of the propositional formula. The source of inspiration for creating a concept of such semantics is a philosophical-linguistic program advanced by H.P. Grice. Grice made a hypothesis according to which the meaning of the speech act is defined more by speaker's intention than by the "conventional" meaning of utterances. A speaker may have hidden intentions towards his speech act – he is manipulating his audience for political or economic aims, for example. Thus, the true meaning of the utterance the speaker uses may even contradict the "conventional" meanings of those expressions. As a consequence, to understand the true meaning of those utterances you should take the speaker's true intentions into consideration. A message is a textual expression of such intentions. In general, messages can express different meta-rules which specify the context for the propositional formula which refers to the "tree". Messages can cooperate between each other as well as with the messages from different trees creating specific kinds of "algebras". By specifying these "algebras" the variety of different alternative propositional logics based on this semantics can be created. By interpreting messages and accordingly modifying the truth values of propositional formulas the situation described by Grice can be emulated. However, it should be admitted that the idea of such logical semantics is wider than just an emulation of the particular linguistic theory.