Real Time Monitoring with Indigenous Peoples: Technical, Social and Political Challenges, and Lessons from Brazil
In: IDS bulletin, Band 44, Heft 2
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872
40 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: IDS bulletin, Band 44, Heft 2
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872
In: Novos Estudos - CEBRAP, Band 38, Heft 2, S. 271-289
Inequality is a key political issue of our times. It has political consequences, fuelling conflict and raising legitimacy challenges for regimes around the world, in democratic and non‑demo‑ cratic settings alike. At the centre of these challenges is the question of accountability: who can be held accountable, on what basis, how and by whom for tackling or failing to tackle which inequalities. In the field of global health, inequality has long been a key issue. A significant body of work — in global health and health systems research — has approached the issue of health inequalities and in‑ equities by highlighting the role of social determinants. A more recent and less developed stream of work frames them in terms of political determinants: in other words, seeing them as issues that may be addressed through politics as well as policy. As a contribution to this literature, and building on the decade-old consensus around the importance of political will in the expansion of access to health services, this Novos Estudos dossier focuses on the politics of ensuring accountability for health equity - or for reducing health inequalities.
BASE
In: The BRICS in International Development, S. 169-206
In: Anuario de Derechos Humanos, Band 0, Heft 8
ISSN: 0718-2058
In: Anuario de Derechos Humanos, Band 0, Heft 8
ISSN: 0718-2279
In this symposium, the following issues are analyzed:1. Theoretical grounds for participation2. Participation mechanisms3. Deficits in participation and social demonstrations4. Participation at the local, national and international level. ; En este simposio se busca responder a las siguientes preguntas:1. Fundamentos de la participación. Partiendo de la base de que debe haber participación de la ciudadanía en los asuntos públicos ¿cuáles serían, a su juicio, los fundamentos de esta participación, ya sea desde la teoría democrática o desde los derechos humanos? ¿En qué debiera consistir entonces la participación?2. Mecanismos de participación. Entre los mecanismos de participación ciudadana normalmente utilizados ¿hay alguno que usted considere particularmente valioso o, por el contrario, que haya demostrado su falta de efectividad o sus efectos perversos a la luz de los derechos humanos?3. Déficits en la participación y protestas sociales. ¿Qué diagnóstico haría usted respecto de las fortalezas y déficits de los mecanismos de participación en América Latina? ¿Son las protestas sociales un signo de que los mecanismos de participación tradicionales no están funcionando como debieran, de que no existen suficientes canales para participar, o pueden considerarse estas protestas como una vía más de participación?4. Participación a nivel local, nacional e internacional. La participación puede darse en distintos niveles: local, regional, nacional o incluso a nivel internacional. ¿Qué desafíos se le plantean a las estrategias de participación en una sociedad globalizada, donde las instancias de poder parecen cada vez más alejadas no solo de la ciudadanía, sino también de las instancias nacionalesde decisión?
BASE
In: Global policy: gp, Band 15, Heft S4, S. 48-59
ISSN: 1758-5899
AbstractDrawing upon 'governance diaries,' a method which used repeated interviews with a set of households and intermediaries in three countries—Mozambique, Myanmar and Pakistan—to understand how marginalised groups meet their daily governance needs, we argue that local governance networks constitute a form of public authority. The networks we examine encompass a range of local actors (state and non‐state), who help develop and enforce rules and ensure social coordination. We highlight the role of intermediaries who constitute the first point of contact for people seeking to resolve various issues. We show how these intermediaries and their networks are specific to each context, not just at a national level, but down to a granular local level. Decision‐making and the exercise of power moves around within the networks, blurring formal/informal boundaries. We conclude that in these contexts of fragility, public authority is embedded in and exercised through local governance networks.
In: IDS bulletin: transforming development knowledge, Band 44, Heft 4, S. 101-115
ISSN: 1759-5436
In: IDS bulletin, Band 44, Heft 4
ISSN: 0265-5012, 0308-5872