Understanding the Intersection between International Human Rights and Mental Disability Law: The Role of Dignity
In: The Routledge Handbook of International Crime and Justice Studies, Bruce Arrigo and Heather Bersot, eds. 2013
73 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The Routledge Handbook of International Crime and Justice Studies, Bruce Arrigo and Heather Bersot, eds. 2013
SSRN
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11/12 #26
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
One of the most controversial policy questions in all of institutional mental disability law is the extent to which patients in psychiatric hospitals have a right to voluntary sexual interaction. The resolution of this matter involves difficult and sensitive questions of law, social policy, clinical judgment, politics, religion, and family structures. As difficult as these questions are in cases involving civil hospitals, the difficulties are exacerbated when the topic is the application of the right in forensic hospitals. Such facilities typically house individuals involved in the criminal-justice system: who may be incompetent to stand trial; who have been found incompetent to stand trial; who have been found not guilty by reason of insanity; or in some cases, who have been convicted of crimes. The legal statuses of these populations raise public concerns such as the extent to which they are entitled to exercise civil rights while institutionalized, and the potential additional danger that might be associated with the granting of sexual freedom to these populations. Additional difficulties are presented when we consider the application of this right in both civil and forensic hospitals in Asia, where the notion of "patients' rights" regrettably lags far behind the construction of such rights in Western nations. How different would my conclusions be if I were looking at these issues from an international perspective? And what impact, if any, would the new United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (U.N. Convention) have on my answer? It is impossible to meaningfully come to grips with the multiple issues presented in this Article without also dealing with the social attitude of sanism, an irrational prejudice of the same quality and character of other irrational prejudices that cause (and are reflected in) prevailing social attitudes of racism, sexism, homophobia, and ethnic bigotry. Sanism infects both our jurisprudence and our lawyering practices; it is largely invisible and largely ...
BASE
In: U.S.-China Law Review, Band 7, Heft 1
SSRN
In: Alabama Law Review, Band 52, S. 193
SSRN
In: The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, Band 1, Heft 2, S. 73-92
ISSN: 2305-9931
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 4209258
SSRN
In: American behavioral scientist: ABS, Band 64, Heft 12, S. 1683-1685
ISSN: 1552-3381
This article introduces the remaining articles in the issue.
In: Lewis & Clark Law Review, Band 25, Heft 2
SSRN
Working paper
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3729503
SSRN
Working paper
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3664705
SSRN
Working paper
In: New Criminal Law Review (2020), Forthcoming
SSRN
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 3203020
SSRN
Working paper
In: NYLS Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2912499
SSRN
Working paper