Suchergebnisse

The article defines that the service and combat activity of the National Guard of Ukraine is a set of coordinated and interrelated preventive, security, protective, isolation and restrictive measures (actions) of bodies, divisions, units and individual officials, carried out in order to ensure the fulfillment of tasks that face it in peacetime and in times of war, as well as crisis situations that threaten national security.It is concluded that over the years of independence of Ukraine, quite a lot of normative legal acts have been adopted in the field of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of the National Guard of Ukraine. A system of administrative legislation has been formed to regulate the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine.The structure of the system of administrative legislation regulating the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine is analyzed. Further studies of the system of administrative and legal regulation of the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine are proposed to be directed at substantiating the forms and methods of public administration of certain areas of activity and functions of the National Guard of Ukraine in the general course of reforming the security and defense sector of Ukraine. ; Визначено, що службово-бойова діяльність Національної гвардії України є сукупністю узгоджених і взаємопов'язаних профілактичних, охоронних, захисних, режимних, ізоляційно-обмежувальних заходів (дій) органів, підрозділів, частин та окремих посадових осіб, що здійснюються з метою забезпечення виконання завдань, які стоять перед нею у мирний час і в умовах воєнного часу, а також кризових ситуацій, що загрожують національній безпеці. Зроблено висновок, що за роки незалежності України було прийнято доволі багато нормативно-правових актів у сфері адміністративно-правового регулювання діяльності Національної гвардії України. Створено систему адміністративного законодавства, що регулює службово-бойову діяльність Національної гвардії України.Проаналізовано структуру системи адміністративного законодавства, що регулює службово-бойову діяльність Національної гвардії України.

The article defines that the service and combat activity of the National Guard of Ukraine is a set of coordinated and interrelated preventive, security, protective, isolation and restrictive measures (actions) of bodies, divisions, units and individual officials, carried out in order to ensure the fulfillment of tasks that face it in peacetime and in times of war, as well as crisis situations that threaten national security.It is concluded that over the years of independence of Ukraine, quite a lot of normative legal acts have been adopted in the field of administrative and legal regulation of the activities of the National Guard of Ukraine. A system of administrative legislation has been formed to regulate the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine.The structure of the system of administrative legislation regulating the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine is analyzed. Further studies of the system of administrative and legal regulation of the service and combat activities of the National Guard of Ukraine are proposed to be directed at substantiating the forms and methods of public administration of certain areas of activity and functions of the National Guard of Ukraine in the general course of reforming the security and defense sector of Ukraine. ; Визначено, що службово-бойова діяльність Національної гвардії України є сукупністю узгоджених і взаємопов'язаних профілактичних, охоронних, захисних, режимних, ізоляційно-обмежувальних заходів (дій) органів, підрозділів, частин та окремих посадових осіб, що здійснюються з метою забезпечення виконання завдань, які стоять перед нею у мирний час і в умовах воєнного часу, а також кризових ситуацій, що загрожують національній безпеці. Зроблено висновок, що за роки незалежності України було прийнято доволі багато нормативно-правових актів у сфері адміністративно-правового регулювання діяльності Національної гвардії України. Створено систему адміністративного законодавства, що регулює службово-бойову діяльність Національної гвардії України.Проаналізовано структуру системи адміністративного законодавства, що регулює службово-бойову діяльність Національної гвардії України.

The article analyzes the category of "legal consciousness" and studies the influence of the system of administrative legislation on the formation of a developed legal consciousness in Russia. Describing the content of legal consciousness, the authors note that a developed legal consciousness is embodied not only in the outwardly legitimate behavior of members of society, but in the behavior based on awareness of the importance and necessity of law, belief in its justice and value.The authors point out the division of legal consciousness into types based on semantic ideas, and speak about the existence of four main types of legal consciousness: constitutional, administrative, criminal and civil. At the same time, administrative legal consciousness embodies the basic ideas, beliefs, values, goals, concepts related to public administration, the activities of the executive branch and the relevant state bodies (their officials), the sphere of law enforcement, as well as the implementation of administrative proceedings.The authors emphasize that for the formation of a developed positive administrative legal consciousness, such characteristics of administrative legislation as systemic, stability, efficiency, consistency and consistency of legal norms, as well as the subsequent uniformity of enforcement, are important.A number of system-forming problems that hinder the formation of a developed positive legal consciousness are highlighted. First, it is the situational and instability of administrative legislation in general and the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation in particular. Secondly, the personal responsibility of subjects of administrative and legal relations for the state of law and order in the state. Thirdly, the abundance of administrative regulations that shift the emphasis on technical and not the substantive component of the process of application of the law. Fourth, the imbalance of interests of the individual and the state.In this regard, the article suggests some directions for the development and systematization of administrative legislation ; В статье проведен анализ категории «правосознание» и исследовано влияние системы административного законодательства на формирование развитого правосознания в России. Характеризуя содержание правосознания, авторы отмечают, что развитое правосознание находит свое воплощение не просто во внешне правомерном поведении членов общества, а в поведении, основанном на осознании важности и необходимости права, убеждения в его справедливости и ценности.Авторы указывают на деление правосознания на типы, в основе которого лежат смыслообразующие идеи, и говорят о существовании четырех основных типов правосознания: конституционного, административного, уголовного и гражданского. При этом административное правосознание воплощает в себе базовые идеи, убеждения, ценности, цели, понятия, относящиеся к сфере государственного управления, деятельности исполнительной власти и соответствующих государственных органов (их должностных лиц), сфере охраны правопорядка, а также сфере осуществления административного судопроизводства.Авторы подчеркивают, что для формирования развитого позитивного административного правосознания важны такие характеристики административного законодательства, как системность, стабильность, эффективность, логичность и непротиворечивость правовых норм, а также последующее единообразие правоприменения.Выделен ряд системообразующих проблем, затрудняющих формирование развитого позитивного правосознания. Во-первых, это ситуационность и нестабильность административного законодательства в целом и Кодекса РФ об административных правонарущениях в частности. Во-вторых, личная ответственность субъектов административно-правовых отношений за состояние законности и правопорядка в государстве. В-третьих, обилие административных регламентов, смещающих акцент на техническую, а не содержательную составляющую процесса применения права. В-четвертых, дисбаланс интересов личности и государства. В связи с этим в статье предложены некоторые направления развития и систематизации административного законодательства.

In the absence of special circumstances, legislation is not a factor determining Administrative Reform. Administrative Reform depends on the social climate of a country and it can come about as all other changes in the country can come about; legislation is only one such method. If the social climate of the country accepts peculiar standards, be they of bribery, corruption, inefficiency, economic wastage or what not, the legislation will naturally reflect those peculiar standards but the root of the evil will not be the legislation itself so much as the peculiar views on which it is based. Take away those views and the legislation will be swept away; maintain those views and the legislation may get entrenched and become stagnant. The remedy, however, is not to look askance at the law, but at the social climate which has provided for the existence of that legislation. ; peer-reviewed

The following articles, the work of the faculty of the School of Law, constitute the first academic comment on the laws of 1957. For obvious reasons, these articles are not represented to the reader as a complete survey of the legislative session. Rather, they are merely a compilation of comments on Acts which the writers have found to be important, timely, or merely interesting. The Administrative Law section deals with amendments cause veto of Model State Administrative Procedure Act legislation.

The following articles, the work of the faculty of the School of Law and a member of the Washington Bar, constitute the first academic comment on the laws of 1959. For obvious reasons, these articles are not represented to the reader as a complete survey of the legislative session. Rather, they are merely a compilation of comments on acts which the writers have found to be important, timely, or merely interesting. The Administrative Law section covers the Administrative Procedure Act (Trautman and Peck) and counties—coordination of administrative procedures (Trautman).

Abstract: Freedom of information legislation is now an item on the political agenda. In the debate about the scope of such legislation, however, some important administrative questions have been ignored. Relevant overseas experience, particularly that of North America, has not been given the attention it deserves. By 1972 the Labor Party had made "open government" an electoral issue, although four distinct notions were involved in this concept, namely administrative review; public comment by public servants; more helpful institutions; and autonomous access to information in institutions. However the efforts of the Labor government during 1972‐75 to implement freedom of information proposals foundered partly because issues of procedures, cost and personnel were not perceived as being salient; and the situation has not changed much since. Questions about the administration of freedom of information legislation are discussed in relation to the recommendations of the Coombs Report, and it is argued that the matter needs to be approached in new ways, one of which is through action research.

The main directions of reforming the system of administrative management in Ukraine are investigated in the article. Modern systems of administrative management are analyzed and it is suggested to concentrate on five main directions of improvement of the system of administrative management: 1. Privatization and decentralization of public administration; 2. Reduction of excessive state regulation; 3. Improving the quality of public services; 4. Improving the efficiency and effectiveness of government; 5. Increasing the information openness of the authorities.

This paper is a continuation of publication of the «Jurisprudence» textbook by Svetlana Vladimirovna Boshno. Law system is a key element of general theory of law. The major fundamentals of its construction are subject matter and method of legal regulation. Of great importance is the division of legal regulation methods into mandative and dispositive ones. The paper articulates the concepts of institute and branch of law demonstrated through various examples. An important classification of branches of law is separation of procedural and substantive, public and private branches of law. Law system and legislation system are considered as interrelated categories that correlate as content and form. A necessary tool for using voluminous legislation is systematization in the following forms: codification, consolidation, incorporation. Codification is considered as a type not only of systematization, but of law-making, too. The reason for this is that in the process of codification, a law-making body makes changes of legislation, as a result of which a new document a statute, is adopted.

Constitutional objections to many of the provisions of the civil service laws have been raised in several of the jurisdictions in which such legislation has been enacted. In addition to the national government there are today ten states which have provided for the application of the merit system to the appointment of all or a portion of the administrative officers and employees. These ten states with the dates of the adoption of the law are as follows: New York, 1883; Massachusetts, 1884; Wisconsin, 1905; New Jersey, 1908; Illinois, 1911; Colorado, 1912; Ohio, California and Connecticut, 1913; and Kansas, 1915. In Illinois and Colorado the employees in the state institutions had been under the merit system for several years prior to the adoption of the general civil service laws.In four of these jurisdictions—California, Colorado, Connecticut and Kansas—there have been no cases involving the constitutionality of civil service legislation. In Colorado there have been at least two bitter controversies in the courts as to the interpretation of the law but in neither case did the parties who fought the law contend that it was unconstitutional. The question of the legality of the adoption of the Colorado law has also been before the courts; but the constitutionality of the provisions of the law has not been attacked. In New Jersey the only case of importance touching the matter of constitutionality is that of the Attorney-General v. McGuinness, but here the decision dealt entirely with the constitutionality of one of the methods prescribed for extending the operation of the law to municipalities.

The article is dedicated to research of the impact of the court decisions on the process of applying the norms of administrative legislation. The author emphasised the importance of determining the newest system of administrative law sources with the aim to formulate the role of court decisions for the dynamics of administrative-legal relations. It is analysed the correlation of such concepts as ''law enforcement'', ''court decision'' and ''judicial legislation''. It is established that complexity of the interconnection between judicial legislation and administrative-legal relations consists in the special impact of the acts of judicial bodies on the public administration functioning. The legal nature of public dispute touches upon the public order in the state, the necessity for proportional correlation of public and private interests, public administration functioning, etc. It is concluded that the efficiency of connection between judicial legislation and administrative legal relations depends on such a phenomenon as a judicial error since under such conditions the relevant impact can have a destructive nature regarding the field of public administration.