Securities Trading
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 920-922
ISSN: 1471-6895
1245 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: The international & comparative law quarterly: ICLQ, Band 25, Heft 4, S. 920-922
ISSN: 1471-6895
In: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation, April 2020
SSRN
SSRN
Working paper
SSRN
Working paper
In: The journal of trading: JOT, Band 4, Heft 3, S. 47-55
ISSN: 1559-3967
In: The quarterly review of economics and finance, Band 43, Heft 2, S. 321-344
ISSN: 1062-9769
In 1993, Malaysia established a Securities Commission to make the securities markets more secure and efficient, and to better control insider trading. This Article first presents an overview of the structure of the Securities Commission and the responsibilities of the various divisions and officers. Second, it reviews the common law and statutory law on which the Commission and other government agencies must rely to regulate the securities markets.
BASE
In: Bundesbank Discussion Paper No. 08/2015
SSRN
In: European company and financial law review: ECFR, Band 3, Heft 4, S. 383-407
ISSN: 1613-2556
Abstract
Major developments like globalisation, technological progress and institutionalisation have influenced and changed today's world. In capital markets they have stirred the emergence of new securities trading systems called ATS which offer investors platforms to trade securities. These new systems provided considerable challenges for regulators. The major concerns raised in connection with ATS were that their existence led to market fragmentation, that transparency was impaired, that access to the systems could either be unfairly denied or be granted too easily, that they could facilitate market abuses, and that their stability could be an issue.
In the European Union provisions for ATS were developed step by step until in 2004 the EU enacted the new Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments (MiFID) which contains a complex and detailed regulation of multilateral and bilateral ATS. By introducing the operation of a multilateral trading facility (MTF) as an investment service the EU acknowledged the existence and benefits of multilateral ATS. The rules for MTF resemble those for regulated markets – the category for traditional stock exchanges. However, they are more flexible and less detailed leaving more room for self-regulation. By introducing rules for so called systematic internalisers the EU also allowed the establishment of bilateral ATS. However, the provisions for systematic internalisers are much stricter than those for MTF and will likely stifle their development.