Tackling Housing Related Anti-Social Behaviour and the Right to Respect for Private Life and Home
In: M. Vols, Woonoverlast en het recht op privéleven. De aanpak van overlastveroorzakers in Nederland, Engeland, Wales en België, Den Haag: BJu 2013
1881595 Ergebnisse
Sortierung:
In: M. Vols, Woonoverlast en het recht op privéleven. De aanpak van overlastveroorzakers in Nederland, Engeland, Wales en België, Den Haag: BJu 2013
SSRN
In: Zbornik radova Pravnog Fakulteta u Nišu: Collection of papers, Faculty of Law, Niš, Band 57, Heft 80, S. 421-444
ISSN: 2560-3116
In: Srpska politička misao: Serbian political thought, Band 70, Heft 4/2020, S. 249-265
The paper analyzes the relationship between freedom of expression and the right to respect for honour and reputation. It was pointed out the importance that is given to freedom of expression nowadays, and it was especially considered the practice of the European Court of Human Rights. On that occasion, the difference that exists between public and private personalities was pointed out, as well as the doubts that may arise from the distinction between factual statements and value judgments. When it comes to the right to privacy, the author referred to the importance of honour and reputation, and on that occasion reminded of the "double" presence of these values. In one case it is Art. 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and in another the case law of the European Court of Human Rights regarding the meaning of the term of the right to privacy from Art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Solutions in domestic law and case law are analyzed, and special attention is paid to one case in which the relationship between freedom of expression and violation of honor and reputation was discussed. The specificity of this situation is reflected, inter alia, in the fact that we are talking about university professors.
The author used the normative, comparative and historical method when writing the paper.
The paper deals with the issue of protection of the right to respect for private and family life in European Court of Human Rights. This right is guaranteed at the level of major international law acts in the area of human rights protection: The Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966. The European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 may be also referred to such acts. It's suggested that ECtHR operating under the monitoring mechanism provided by the Convention pays conspicuous attention to issues of the right to respect for private and family life guaranteed under article 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. To support this claim corresponding statistics is brought forward. The content of private and family life concepts in ECtHR practice is studied. The Court's understanding of invasion of private and family life on the part of the state under Part 2 Art. 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 and legal views of ECtHR are considered. Protection of human rights in the area of environmental conservation pursuant to Art. 8 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and corresponding elaborated approaches are studied. ; peer-reviewed
BASE
In: European research studies, Band XIX, Heft 3B, S. 97-110
ISSN: 1108-2976
This text provides a comprehensive, detailed and up-to-date account of Strasbourg case-law on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. It focuses on the Court's most important cases on private and family life, home and correspondence, which have been selected following the Court's Jurisconsult's opinion of their jurisprudential interest.
In: (2008) European Human Rights Law Review 44
SSRN
This article is dedicated to a theoretical and legal study of the concept of "the right to respect for family life". It is based on legal analysis of Ukrainian legislation and the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. It has been argued that the legal bases for state interference in family life are: 1) interference committed under the law, 2) interference with the interests of the majority in a democratic society, 3) interference to prevent disorder, crime, health, morality , rights and freedoms of other citizens.
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
International audience ; Long confined to the fields of artistic creation and journalism, the right to be forgotten has now taken on a much broader and utterly unprecedented dimension. This situation is in direct correlation with three factors: the development of digitization techniques which allow significant amounts of data to be stored; the internet, which has democratized access a large part of the data stored; and lastly, the use of search engines, which gives real access for all to such data.While the right to be forgotten has traditionally be considered as one of the counterparts of private life, this argument is increasingly irrelevant in the age of the digital environment and social media. In order to be protected by the right to respect for private life, a given act or data must fall within the scope of private life. An examination of case law shows that the right to be forgotten is not confined to the private life of individuals. Furthermore, the time criterion, which is an essential element of the right to be forgotten, is alien to the right to respect for private life. The argument is thus supplanted by measures for the protection of personal data, the full potential of which was demonstrated by the European Court of Justice with regard to the problem of search engines and the right to be forgotten, in particular. ; Longtemps cantonné au domaine de la création artistique et de l'activité journalistique, le droit à l'oubli prend aujourd'hui une dimension beaucoup plus large et totalement inédite. Cette situation est en corrélation directe avec trois facteurs : le développement des techniques de numérisation qui permettent de stocker un nombre considérable de données, Internet qui a démocratisé l'accès à une grande partie des données stockées et enfin, l'activité des moteurs de recherche qui permet à tous une accessibilité réelle à ces données.Si traditionnellement, le droit à l'oubli est perçu comme l'un des pendants du droit au respect de la vie privée, ce fondement est de moins en moins pertinent à ...
BASE
In: Human rights law review, Band 8, Heft 1, S. 185-196
ISSN: 1744-1021