Suchergebnisse

Den Untersuchungsgegenstand des Aufsatzes bilden die Auswirkungen unterschiedlicher berufsbiographischer Erfahrungen auf die sozialen Beziehungen zu Freunden und Verwandten. Es wird auf Basis der Informationen des Familiensurvey 2000 untersucht, inwiefern diese beiden Beziehungssysteme aufgrund charakteristischer Unterschiede inhärenter Beziehungslogiken unterschiedlich auf bestimmte berufsbiographische Erfahrungen reagieren. Dabei konzentriert sich der Autor auf die Gruppe der männlichen Erwerbspersonen, da bei ihnen am ehesten eine primäre Ausrichtung auf das Erwerbsleben unterstellt werden kann. Der erste Abschnitt umfasst die Darstellung der informellen Beziehungssysteme von Freundschaft und Verwandtschaft, die als unterschiedliche Lösungsmöglichkeiten für konkrete Lebensaufgaben in Abhängigkeit von bestimmten sozialstrukturellen Konstellationen gelten können. Damit verbunden sind unterschiedliche Erwartungen an diese Beziehungssysteme, die aus berufsbiographischen Erfahrungen unterschiedlicher Art resultieren. Beide Konzepte werden im Zuge der Unterscheidung zwischen Familie und Verwandtschaft sowie bestimmter Familienbeziehungen und Generationszugehörigkeiten weiter ausdifferenziert. Auf dieser Basis folgt die Entwicklung konkreter Hypothesen zu Freundschaften, Familien- und Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen allgemein, speziell zur Beziehung zu den Eltern sowie zur Geschwisterbeziehung. Im dritten Abschnitt werden dann die Datenbasis und die Operationalisierung dargelegt. Darauf aufbauend werden im Anschluss die Ergebnisse präsentiert und erörtert. Der Beitrag schließt mit einer Zusammenfassung der Einzelergebnisse und einem Ausblick, indem auf Probleme der präsentierten Analysen und Interpretationen aufmerksam gemacht wird. (ICG2)

This afterword offers a commentary on the concept of relations
discussed in the introduction and the individual contributions to this special issue by critically reflecting on the key concepts that have emerged in it. It contributes to the discussion with a reflection on the use of the term parente in Amazonia, showing how its exclusive use in inter-ethnic contexts indicates a play of perspective in the way that relations between different groups of people are experienced.

barbara herrnstein smith is Braxton Craven Professor of Comparative Literature and English and Director of the Center for Interdisciplinary Studies in Science and Cultural Theory at Duke University,and Distinguished Professor of English at Brown University. Her recent publications include Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy (Harvard University Press, 1997) and"Cutting-Edge Equivocation: Conceptual Moves and Rhetorical Strategies in Contemporary Anti-Epistemology" (South Atlantic Quarterly101 [2002]). Her contribution to this issue is part of a work in progress titled Scandalous Knowledge: Science, Truth, and the Human.

The problem of absolute and relative gains divides neoliberal institutionalism and structural realism. The former assumes states focus primarily on their absolute gains and emphasizes the prospects for cooperation. The latter supposes states are largely concerned with relative gains and emphasizes the prospects for conflict. Existing work in international relations theory generally traces the differences between these two theories to different assumptions about states' preferences. Using a simple game-theoretic model, this essay offers a reformulation of the problem of absolute and relative gains that links changes in the states' behavior, the feasibility of cooperation, and especially the states' concern for relative versus absolute gains explicitly to changes in the constraints facing the states. Many of the differences between neoliberal institutionalism and structural realism appear as special cases of the model.

The study presents the structure and intensity of the relationships of the Hungarian population over 16 years of age through a descriptive analysis of four variables measuring the frequency of personal and distance contact with relatives and friends from the EU-SILC 2015 survey. According to the data, the relationship structure is on average balanced, half of the relationships are related to relatives or friends, and the relative proportions of personal and long-distance relationships are similar. According to our results, in addition to age, the financial situation of the household has a significant correlation with the characteristics of the relationship structure. One of the lessons of multivariate regression models is that the effect of other background variables on the relationship structure intensifies in parallel with aging, leading to a deepening of relationship inequalities among the elderly. Another lesson of the models is that the inclusion of household characteristics (financial situation, number of household members, material transfer relationship with other households) has a significant effect on the mechanism of individual background variables, thus confirming that a deeper study of relationship intensity and relationship structure within the household is essential. At the end of our analysis, we compiled clusters based on the intensity of relationships, the direction of relationships, and the channel of contacting, with a relative majority of more than one-third of the respondents with extremely weak relationship embeddedness.

The article analyzes the legal division of the absolute and relative. Consider the features of these relations, their common and distinctive features. The conclusions on the analysis of data relationships.